Cargando…
Releasable Suture versus Autologous Blood for Pterygium Surgery using Conjunctival Autografts
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of releasable single suture (RS) for conjunctival autograft (CAG) and to compare it with sutureless gluefree (SG) technique in pterygium surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective comparative study on patients with primary pterygium who underwent CAG. In 150 pat...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095206 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v15i1.5938 |
_version_ | 1783494157752336384 |
---|---|
author | Parmar, Gautam Singh Ghodke, Bhushan Meena, Ashok Kumar |
author_facet | Parmar, Gautam Singh Ghodke, Bhushan Meena, Ashok Kumar |
author_sort | Parmar, Gautam Singh |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of releasable single suture (RS) for conjunctival autograft (CAG) and to compare it with sutureless gluefree (SG) technique in pterygium surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective comparative study on patients with primary pterygium who underwent CAG. In 150 patients, CAG was additionally secured by a single 10-0 nylon releasable suture (RS) which was released on the first postoperative day. In 47 patients, no suture was applied, and CAG was allowed to stick to the scleral bed by autologous fibrin only (SG group). The duration of surgery and size of CAG (in mm [Formula: see text]) was noted in both groups. All patients completed one year of follow-up. Factors that were studied included graft stability, patient comfort, complications, and recurrence. RESULTS: The mean age of patients in RS and SG groups was 39.6 [Formula: see text] 11.8 and 47.3 [Formula: see text] 13.8 years, respectively. The mean duration of surgery was 4.84 [Formula: see text] 1.34 min in RS group and 4.90 [Formula: see text] 1.42 min in SG group (P = 0.001). The size of CAG used in both groups was comparable with more stability in RS group postoperatively. Graft retraction rate in RS group was 5.3% (1 mm retraction in CAG more than 36 mm [Formula: see text]) with no event of graft loss. The graft loss occurred in 6.3% of eyes in SG group. The recurrence rate in RS group was 4%, while in SG group it was 6.3% (P = 0.4). CONCLUSION: RS, by augmenting the autologous blood mechanism, may offer an easy to learn option for pterygium surgery with good stability even in large sized CAGs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7001028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70010282020-02-24 Releasable Suture versus Autologous Blood for Pterygium Surgery using Conjunctival Autografts Parmar, Gautam Singh Ghodke, Bhushan Meena, Ashok Kumar J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of releasable single suture (RS) for conjunctival autograft (CAG) and to compare it with sutureless gluefree (SG) technique in pterygium surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective comparative study on patients with primary pterygium who underwent CAG. In 150 patients, CAG was additionally secured by a single 10-0 nylon releasable suture (RS) which was released on the first postoperative day. In 47 patients, no suture was applied, and CAG was allowed to stick to the scleral bed by autologous fibrin only (SG group). The duration of surgery and size of CAG (in mm [Formula: see text]) was noted in both groups. All patients completed one year of follow-up. Factors that were studied included graft stability, patient comfort, complications, and recurrence. RESULTS: The mean age of patients in RS and SG groups was 39.6 [Formula: see text] 11.8 and 47.3 [Formula: see text] 13.8 years, respectively. The mean duration of surgery was 4.84 [Formula: see text] 1.34 min in RS group and 4.90 [Formula: see text] 1.42 min in SG group (P = 0.001). The size of CAG used in both groups was comparable with more stability in RS group postoperatively. Graft retraction rate in RS group was 5.3% (1 mm retraction in CAG more than 36 mm [Formula: see text]) with no event of graft loss. The graft loss occurred in 6.3% of eyes in SG group. The recurrence rate in RS group was 4%, while in SG group it was 6.3% (P = 0.4). CONCLUSION: RS, by augmenting the autologous blood mechanism, may offer an easy to learn option for pterygium surgery with good stability even in large sized CAGs. PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E 2020-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7001028/ /pubmed/32095206 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v15i1.5938 Text en Copyright © 2020 Parmar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Parmar, Gautam Singh Ghodke, Bhushan Meena, Ashok Kumar Releasable Suture versus Autologous Blood for Pterygium Surgery using Conjunctival Autografts |
title | Releasable Suture versus Autologous Blood for Pterygium Surgery using Conjunctival Autografts |
title_full | Releasable Suture versus Autologous Blood for Pterygium Surgery using Conjunctival Autografts |
title_fullStr | Releasable Suture versus Autologous Blood for Pterygium Surgery using Conjunctival Autografts |
title_full_unstemmed | Releasable Suture versus Autologous Blood for Pterygium Surgery using Conjunctival Autografts |
title_short | Releasable Suture versus Autologous Blood for Pterygium Surgery using Conjunctival Autografts |
title_sort | releasable suture versus autologous blood for pterygium surgery using conjunctival autografts |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095206 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v15i1.5938 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parmargautamsingh releasablesutureversusautologousbloodforpterygiumsurgeryusingconjunctivalautografts AT ghodkebhushan releasablesutureversusautologousbloodforpterygiumsurgeryusingconjunctivalautografts AT meenaashokkumar releasablesutureversusautologousbloodforpterygiumsurgeryusingconjunctivalautografts |