Cargando…

Releasable Suture versus Autologous Blood for Pterygium Surgery using Conjunctival Autografts

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of releasable single suture (RS) for conjunctival autograft (CAG) and to compare it with sutureless gluefree (SG) technique in pterygium surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective comparative study on patients with primary pterygium who underwent CAG. In 150 pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parmar, Gautam Singh, Ghodke, Bhushan, Meena, Ashok Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095206
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v15i1.5938
_version_ 1783494157752336384
author Parmar, Gautam Singh
Ghodke, Bhushan
Meena, Ashok Kumar
author_facet Parmar, Gautam Singh
Ghodke, Bhushan
Meena, Ashok Kumar
author_sort Parmar, Gautam Singh
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of releasable single suture (RS) for conjunctival autograft (CAG) and to compare it with sutureless gluefree (SG) technique in pterygium surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective comparative study on patients with primary pterygium who underwent CAG. In 150 patients, CAG was additionally secured by a single 10-0 nylon releasable suture (RS) which was released on the first postoperative day. In 47 patients, no suture was applied, and CAG was allowed to stick to the scleral bed by autologous fibrin only (SG group). The duration of surgery and size of CAG (in mm [Formula: see text]) was noted in both groups. All patients completed one year of follow-up. Factors that were studied included graft stability, patient comfort, complications, and recurrence. RESULTS: The mean age of patients in RS and SG groups was 39.6 [Formula: see text] 11.8 and 47.3 [Formula: see text] 13.8 years, respectively. The mean duration of surgery was 4.84 [Formula: see text] 1.34 min in RS group and 4.90 [Formula: see text] 1.42 min in SG group (P = 0.001). The size of CAG used in both groups was comparable with more stability in RS group postoperatively. Graft retraction rate in RS group was 5.3% (1 mm retraction in CAG more than 36 mm [Formula: see text]) with no event of graft loss. The graft loss occurred in 6.3% of eyes in SG group. The recurrence rate in RS group was 4%, while in SG group it was 6.3% (P = 0.4). CONCLUSION: RS, by augmenting the autologous blood mechanism, may offer an easy to learn option for pterygium surgery with good stability even in large sized CAGs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7001028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70010282020-02-24 Releasable Suture versus Autologous Blood for Pterygium Surgery using Conjunctival Autografts Parmar, Gautam Singh Ghodke, Bhushan Meena, Ashok Kumar J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of releasable single suture (RS) for conjunctival autograft (CAG) and to compare it with sutureless gluefree (SG) technique in pterygium surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective comparative study on patients with primary pterygium who underwent CAG. In 150 patients, CAG was additionally secured by a single 10-0 nylon releasable suture (RS) which was released on the first postoperative day. In 47 patients, no suture was applied, and CAG was allowed to stick to the scleral bed by autologous fibrin only (SG group). The duration of surgery and size of CAG (in mm [Formula: see text]) was noted in both groups. All patients completed one year of follow-up. Factors that were studied included graft stability, patient comfort, complications, and recurrence. RESULTS: The mean age of patients in RS and SG groups was 39.6 [Formula: see text] 11.8 and 47.3 [Formula: see text] 13.8 years, respectively. The mean duration of surgery was 4.84 [Formula: see text] 1.34 min in RS group and 4.90 [Formula: see text] 1.42 min in SG group (P = 0.001). The size of CAG used in both groups was comparable with more stability in RS group postoperatively. Graft retraction rate in RS group was 5.3% (1 mm retraction in CAG more than 36 mm [Formula: see text]) with no event of graft loss. The graft loss occurred in 6.3% of eyes in SG group. The recurrence rate in RS group was 4%, while in SG group it was 6.3% (P = 0.4). CONCLUSION: RS, by augmenting the autologous blood mechanism, may offer an easy to learn option for pterygium surgery with good stability even in large sized CAGs. PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E 2020-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7001028/ /pubmed/32095206 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v15i1.5938 Text en Copyright © 2020 Parmar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Parmar, Gautam Singh
Ghodke, Bhushan
Meena, Ashok Kumar
Releasable Suture versus Autologous Blood for Pterygium Surgery using Conjunctival Autografts
title Releasable Suture versus Autologous Blood for Pterygium Surgery using Conjunctival Autografts
title_full Releasable Suture versus Autologous Blood for Pterygium Surgery using Conjunctival Autografts
title_fullStr Releasable Suture versus Autologous Blood for Pterygium Surgery using Conjunctival Autografts
title_full_unstemmed Releasable Suture versus Autologous Blood for Pterygium Surgery using Conjunctival Autografts
title_short Releasable Suture versus Autologous Blood for Pterygium Surgery using Conjunctival Autografts
title_sort releasable suture versus autologous blood for pterygium surgery using conjunctival autografts
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095206
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v15i1.5938
work_keys_str_mv AT parmargautamsingh releasablesutureversusautologousbloodforpterygiumsurgeryusingconjunctivalautografts
AT ghodkebhushan releasablesutureversusautologousbloodforpterygiumsurgeryusingconjunctivalautografts
AT meenaashokkumar releasablesutureversusautologousbloodforpterygiumsurgeryusingconjunctivalautografts