Cargando…

Ultrasound-guided Platelet-rich Plasma Application Versus Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Comparative Clinical Study

Purpose The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of ultrasound (US)-guided platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections versus US-guided corticosteroid injections (CSI) in the treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS). Methods Between January 2015 and De...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Begkas, Dimitrios, Chatzopoulos, Stamatios-Theodoros, Touzopoulos, Panagiotis, Balanika, Alexia, Pastroudis, Alexandros
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32051796
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6583
_version_ 1783494176921354240
author Begkas, Dimitrios
Chatzopoulos, Stamatios-Theodoros
Touzopoulos, Panagiotis
Balanika, Alexia
Pastroudis, Alexandros
author_facet Begkas, Dimitrios
Chatzopoulos, Stamatios-Theodoros
Touzopoulos, Panagiotis
Balanika, Alexia
Pastroudis, Alexandros
author_sort Begkas, Dimitrios
collection PubMed
description Purpose The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of ultrasound (US)-guided platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections versus US-guided corticosteroid injections (CSI) in the treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS). Methods Between January 2015 and December 2016, 24 patients with GTPS were enrolled and randomized in two groups (A and B). Group A (study group) patients received US-guided PRP injection treatment, while group B (control group) patients received US-guided CSI treatment. Clinical outcomes in both groups were evaluated and compared using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of pain, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the presence or absence of complications at 4, 12, and 24 weeks post-injection. The level of significance was set at p<0.05. Results Both groups showed improved scores (VAS and HHS) compared to the pre-injection period, but patients in group A had a statistically significant (p <0.05) decrease in VAS score and a significantly increased HHS at the last follow-up (24 weeks post-injection). No complications were reported. Conclusions In conclusion, patients with GTPS present better and longer-lasting clinical results when treated with US-guided PRP injections compared to those with CSI. Further studies are needed to optimize the technical preparation of PRP, the sample concentration, the number of injections and the time intervals between them, in order to achieve the maximum desired results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7001131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70011312020-02-12 Ultrasound-guided Platelet-rich Plasma Application Versus Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Comparative Clinical Study Begkas, Dimitrios Chatzopoulos, Stamatios-Theodoros Touzopoulos, Panagiotis Balanika, Alexia Pastroudis, Alexandros Cureus Orthopedics Purpose The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of ultrasound (US)-guided platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections versus US-guided corticosteroid injections (CSI) in the treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS). Methods Between January 2015 and December 2016, 24 patients with GTPS were enrolled and randomized in two groups (A and B). Group A (study group) patients received US-guided PRP injection treatment, while group B (control group) patients received US-guided CSI treatment. Clinical outcomes in both groups were evaluated and compared using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of pain, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the presence or absence of complications at 4, 12, and 24 weeks post-injection. The level of significance was set at p<0.05. Results Both groups showed improved scores (VAS and HHS) compared to the pre-injection period, but patients in group A had a statistically significant (p <0.05) decrease in VAS score and a significantly increased HHS at the last follow-up (24 weeks post-injection). No complications were reported. Conclusions In conclusion, patients with GTPS present better and longer-lasting clinical results when treated with US-guided PRP injections compared to those with CSI. Further studies are needed to optimize the technical preparation of PRP, the sample concentration, the number of injections and the time intervals between them, in order to achieve the maximum desired results. Cureus 2020-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7001131/ /pubmed/32051796 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6583 Text en Copyright © 2020, Begkas et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Begkas, Dimitrios
Chatzopoulos, Stamatios-Theodoros
Touzopoulos, Panagiotis
Balanika, Alexia
Pastroudis, Alexandros
Ultrasound-guided Platelet-rich Plasma Application Versus Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Comparative Clinical Study
title Ultrasound-guided Platelet-rich Plasma Application Versus Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Comparative Clinical Study
title_full Ultrasound-guided Platelet-rich Plasma Application Versus Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Comparative Clinical Study
title_fullStr Ultrasound-guided Platelet-rich Plasma Application Versus Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Comparative Clinical Study
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-guided Platelet-rich Plasma Application Versus Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Comparative Clinical Study
title_short Ultrasound-guided Platelet-rich Plasma Application Versus Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Comparative Clinical Study
title_sort ultrasound-guided platelet-rich plasma application versus corticosteroid injections for the treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a prospective controlled randomized comparative clinical study
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32051796
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6583
work_keys_str_mv AT begkasdimitrios ultrasoundguidedplateletrichplasmaapplicationversuscorticosteroidinjectionsforthetreatmentofgreatertrochantericpainsyndromeaprospectivecontrolledrandomizedcomparativeclinicalstudy
AT chatzopoulosstamatiostheodoros ultrasoundguidedplateletrichplasmaapplicationversuscorticosteroidinjectionsforthetreatmentofgreatertrochantericpainsyndromeaprospectivecontrolledrandomizedcomparativeclinicalstudy
AT touzopoulospanagiotis ultrasoundguidedplateletrichplasmaapplicationversuscorticosteroidinjectionsforthetreatmentofgreatertrochantericpainsyndromeaprospectivecontrolledrandomizedcomparativeclinicalstudy
AT balanikaalexia ultrasoundguidedplateletrichplasmaapplicationversuscorticosteroidinjectionsforthetreatmentofgreatertrochantericpainsyndromeaprospectivecontrolledrandomizedcomparativeclinicalstudy
AT pastroudisalexandros ultrasoundguidedplateletrichplasmaapplicationversuscorticosteroidinjectionsforthetreatmentofgreatertrochantericpainsyndromeaprospectivecontrolledrandomizedcomparativeclinicalstudy