Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness of an economic empowerment program on adolescent economic assets, education and health in a humanitarian setting

BACKGROUND: Adolescence is a critical period of human development, however, limited research on programs to improve health and well-being among younger adolescents living in conflict-affected and humanitarian settings exists. The purpose of this study was to assess the comparative effectiveness of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glass, Nancy, Remy, Mitima Mpanano, Mayo-Wilson, Larissa Jennings, Kohli, Anjalee, Sommer, Marni, Turner, Rachael, Perrin, Nancy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32019539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8219-6
_version_ 1783494189025067008
author Glass, Nancy
Remy, Mitima Mpanano
Mayo-Wilson, Larissa Jennings
Kohli, Anjalee
Sommer, Marni
Turner, Rachael
Perrin, Nancy
author_facet Glass, Nancy
Remy, Mitima Mpanano
Mayo-Wilson, Larissa Jennings
Kohli, Anjalee
Sommer, Marni
Turner, Rachael
Perrin, Nancy
author_sort Glass, Nancy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adolescence is a critical period of human development, however, limited research on programs to improve health and well-being among younger adolescents living in conflict-affected and humanitarian settings exists. The purpose of this study was to assess the comparative effectiveness of an economic empowerment program on young adolescent outcomes in a complex humanitarian setting. METHODS: This longitudinal, mixed methods study examined the relative effectiveness of an integrated parent (Pigs for Peace, PFP) and young adolescent (Rabbits for Resilience, RFR) animal microfinance/asset transfer program (RFR + PFP) on adolescent outcomes of asset building, school attendance, mental health, experienced stigma, and food security compared to RFR only and PFP only over 24 months. A sub-sample of young adolescents completed in-depth qualitative interviews on the benefits and challenges of participating in RFR. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-two young adolescents (10–15 years) participated in three groups: RFR + PFP (N = 178), RFR only (N = 187), PFP only (N = 177). 501 (92.4%) completed baseline surveys, with 81.7% (n = 442) retention at endline. The group by time interaction (24 months) was significant for adolescent asset building (X(2) = 16.54, p = .002), school attendance (X(2) = 12.33, p = .015), and prosocial behavior (X(2) = 10.56, p = .032). RFR + PFP (ES = 0.31, ES = 0.38) and RFR only (ES-0.39, ES = 0.14) adolescents had greater improvement in asset building and prosocial behavior compared to PFP only, respectively. The odds of missing two or more days of school in the past month were 78.4% lower in RFR only and 45.1% lower in RFR + PFP compared to PFP only. No differences between groups in change over time were found for internalizing behaviors, experienced stigma, or food security. Differences by age and gender were observed in asset building, prosocial behavior, school attendance, experienced stigma, and food security. The voices of young adolescents identified the benefits of the RFR program through their ability to pay for school fees, help their families meet basic needs, and the respect they gained from family and community. Challenges included death of rabbits and potential conflict within the household on how to use the rabbit asset. CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the potential for integrating economic empowerment programs with both parents and young adolescents to improve economic, educational, and health outcomes for young adolescents growing up in rural and complex humanitarian settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02008695. Retrospectively registered 11 December 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7001195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70011952020-02-10 Comparative effectiveness of an economic empowerment program on adolescent economic assets, education and health in a humanitarian setting Glass, Nancy Remy, Mitima Mpanano Mayo-Wilson, Larissa Jennings Kohli, Anjalee Sommer, Marni Turner, Rachael Perrin, Nancy BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Adolescence is a critical period of human development, however, limited research on programs to improve health and well-being among younger adolescents living in conflict-affected and humanitarian settings exists. The purpose of this study was to assess the comparative effectiveness of an economic empowerment program on young adolescent outcomes in a complex humanitarian setting. METHODS: This longitudinal, mixed methods study examined the relative effectiveness of an integrated parent (Pigs for Peace, PFP) and young adolescent (Rabbits for Resilience, RFR) animal microfinance/asset transfer program (RFR + PFP) on adolescent outcomes of asset building, school attendance, mental health, experienced stigma, and food security compared to RFR only and PFP only over 24 months. A sub-sample of young adolescents completed in-depth qualitative interviews on the benefits and challenges of participating in RFR. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-two young adolescents (10–15 years) participated in three groups: RFR + PFP (N = 178), RFR only (N = 187), PFP only (N = 177). 501 (92.4%) completed baseline surveys, with 81.7% (n = 442) retention at endline. The group by time interaction (24 months) was significant for adolescent asset building (X(2) = 16.54, p = .002), school attendance (X(2) = 12.33, p = .015), and prosocial behavior (X(2) = 10.56, p = .032). RFR + PFP (ES = 0.31, ES = 0.38) and RFR only (ES-0.39, ES = 0.14) adolescents had greater improvement in asset building and prosocial behavior compared to PFP only, respectively. The odds of missing two or more days of school in the past month were 78.4% lower in RFR only and 45.1% lower in RFR + PFP compared to PFP only. No differences between groups in change over time were found for internalizing behaviors, experienced stigma, or food security. Differences by age and gender were observed in asset building, prosocial behavior, school attendance, experienced stigma, and food security. The voices of young adolescents identified the benefits of the RFR program through their ability to pay for school fees, help their families meet basic needs, and the respect they gained from family and community. Challenges included death of rabbits and potential conflict within the household on how to use the rabbit asset. CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the potential for integrating economic empowerment programs with both parents and young adolescents to improve economic, educational, and health outcomes for young adolescents growing up in rural and complex humanitarian settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02008695. Retrospectively registered 11 December 2013. BioMed Central 2020-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7001195/ /pubmed/32019539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8219-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Glass, Nancy
Remy, Mitima Mpanano
Mayo-Wilson, Larissa Jennings
Kohli, Anjalee
Sommer, Marni
Turner, Rachael
Perrin, Nancy
Comparative effectiveness of an economic empowerment program on adolescent economic assets, education and health in a humanitarian setting
title Comparative effectiveness of an economic empowerment program on adolescent economic assets, education and health in a humanitarian setting
title_full Comparative effectiveness of an economic empowerment program on adolescent economic assets, education and health in a humanitarian setting
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of an economic empowerment program on adolescent economic assets, education and health in a humanitarian setting
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of an economic empowerment program on adolescent economic assets, education and health in a humanitarian setting
title_short Comparative effectiveness of an economic empowerment program on adolescent economic assets, education and health in a humanitarian setting
title_sort comparative effectiveness of an economic empowerment program on adolescent economic assets, education and health in a humanitarian setting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32019539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8219-6
work_keys_str_mv AT glassnancy comparativeeffectivenessofaneconomicempowermentprogramonadolescenteconomicassetseducationandhealthinahumanitariansetting
AT remymitimampanano comparativeeffectivenessofaneconomicempowermentprogramonadolescenteconomicassetseducationandhealthinahumanitariansetting
AT mayowilsonlarissajennings comparativeeffectivenessofaneconomicempowermentprogramonadolescenteconomicassetseducationandhealthinahumanitariansetting
AT kohlianjalee comparativeeffectivenessofaneconomicempowermentprogramonadolescenteconomicassetseducationandhealthinahumanitariansetting
AT sommermarni comparativeeffectivenessofaneconomicempowermentprogramonadolescenteconomicassetseducationandhealthinahumanitariansetting
AT turnerrachael comparativeeffectivenessofaneconomicempowermentprogramonadolescenteconomicassetseducationandhealthinahumanitariansetting
AT perrinnancy comparativeeffectivenessofaneconomicempowermentprogramonadolescenteconomicassetseducationandhealthinahumanitariansetting