Cargando…

Home-based telemonitoring versus hospital admission in high risk pregnancies: a qualitative study on women’s experiences

BACKGROUND: Hospital admission during pregnancy complications is considered to be an event of significant impact. Besides conventional in-clinic maternal and fetal monitoring, recent technologies enable home-based telemonitoring with self-measurements in high risk pregnancy. This study is part of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Heuvel, J. F. M., Teunis, C. J., Franx, A., Crombag, N. M. T. H., Bekker, M. N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32019499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2779-4
_version_ 1783494199015899136
author van den Heuvel, J. F. M.
Teunis, C. J.
Franx, A.
Crombag, N. M. T. H.
Bekker, M. N.
author_facet van den Heuvel, J. F. M.
Teunis, C. J.
Franx, A.
Crombag, N. M. T. H.
Bekker, M. N.
author_sort van den Heuvel, J. F. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospital admission during pregnancy complications is considered to be an event of significant impact. Besides conventional in-clinic maternal and fetal monitoring, recent technologies enable home-based telemonitoring with self-measurements in high risk pregnancy. This study is part of a feasibility pilot to explore the usability and acceptability of telemonitoring and aims to gain insight in the experiences and preferences of high risk pregnant women concerning the novel strategy of telemonitoring, opposed to women who were hospitalized in pregnancy. METHODS: Using secured Facebook Groups, we conducted four online focus groups: two focus groups with women who were admitted during pregnancy (n = 11) and two with women who received home telemonitoring in the pilot phase (n = 11). The qualitative data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Four major themes emerged from both participant groups: [1] care experience, [2] emotions regarding pregnancy, [3] privacy and [4] impact on daily life. Different views were reported on all four themes, resulting in a direct comparison of experiences during hospitalization and telemonitoring. Most admitted patients reported a growing sense of boredom and anxiety during their clinical admission. Lack of privacy on ward was a great concern, as it affected their contact with hospital staff and family. This issue was not reported amongst telemonitored women. These participants still felt like a patient at times but responded that the comfort of their own home and bed was pleasant. Only a minority of telemonitored participants reported being anxious at times at home, while not having a physician or nurse nearby. Being at home resulted in less travel time for partners or family for hospital visits, which had its positive effects on family life. CONCLUSIONS: Telemonitoring of a high-risk pregnancy provides an innovative manner to monitor fetal and maternal condition from home. Compared to the experiences of hospital admission in high risk pregnancy, it allows women to be in a comforting and private environment during an anxious time in their lives. As future studies should further investigate the safety and cost effectiveness of this novel strategy, women’s views on the preference of telemonitoring need to be taken into consideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7001237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70012372020-02-10 Home-based telemonitoring versus hospital admission in high risk pregnancies: a qualitative study on women’s experiences van den Heuvel, J. F. M. Teunis, C. J. Franx, A. Crombag, N. M. T. H. Bekker, M. N. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Hospital admission during pregnancy complications is considered to be an event of significant impact. Besides conventional in-clinic maternal and fetal monitoring, recent technologies enable home-based telemonitoring with self-measurements in high risk pregnancy. This study is part of a feasibility pilot to explore the usability and acceptability of telemonitoring and aims to gain insight in the experiences and preferences of high risk pregnant women concerning the novel strategy of telemonitoring, opposed to women who were hospitalized in pregnancy. METHODS: Using secured Facebook Groups, we conducted four online focus groups: two focus groups with women who were admitted during pregnancy (n = 11) and two with women who received home telemonitoring in the pilot phase (n = 11). The qualitative data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Four major themes emerged from both participant groups: [1] care experience, [2] emotions regarding pregnancy, [3] privacy and [4] impact on daily life. Different views were reported on all four themes, resulting in a direct comparison of experiences during hospitalization and telemonitoring. Most admitted patients reported a growing sense of boredom and anxiety during their clinical admission. Lack of privacy on ward was a great concern, as it affected their contact with hospital staff and family. This issue was not reported amongst telemonitored women. These participants still felt like a patient at times but responded that the comfort of their own home and bed was pleasant. Only a minority of telemonitored participants reported being anxious at times at home, while not having a physician or nurse nearby. Being at home resulted in less travel time for partners or family for hospital visits, which had its positive effects on family life. CONCLUSIONS: Telemonitoring of a high-risk pregnancy provides an innovative manner to monitor fetal and maternal condition from home. Compared to the experiences of hospital admission in high risk pregnancy, it allows women to be in a comforting and private environment during an anxious time in their lives. As future studies should further investigate the safety and cost effectiveness of this novel strategy, women’s views on the preference of telemonitoring need to be taken into consideration. BioMed Central 2020-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7001237/ /pubmed/32019499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2779-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
van den Heuvel, J. F. M.
Teunis, C. J.
Franx, A.
Crombag, N. M. T. H.
Bekker, M. N.
Home-based telemonitoring versus hospital admission in high risk pregnancies: a qualitative study on women’s experiences
title Home-based telemonitoring versus hospital admission in high risk pregnancies: a qualitative study on women’s experiences
title_full Home-based telemonitoring versus hospital admission in high risk pregnancies: a qualitative study on women’s experiences
title_fullStr Home-based telemonitoring versus hospital admission in high risk pregnancies: a qualitative study on women’s experiences
title_full_unstemmed Home-based telemonitoring versus hospital admission in high risk pregnancies: a qualitative study on women’s experiences
title_short Home-based telemonitoring versus hospital admission in high risk pregnancies: a qualitative study on women’s experiences
title_sort home-based telemonitoring versus hospital admission in high risk pregnancies: a qualitative study on women’s experiences
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32019499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2779-4
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenheuveljfm homebasedtelemonitoringversushospitaladmissioninhighriskpregnanciesaqualitativestudyonwomensexperiences
AT teuniscj homebasedtelemonitoringversushospitaladmissioninhighriskpregnanciesaqualitativestudyonwomensexperiences
AT franxa homebasedtelemonitoringversushospitaladmissioninhighriskpregnanciesaqualitativestudyonwomensexperiences
AT crombagnmth homebasedtelemonitoringversushospitaladmissioninhighriskpregnanciesaqualitativestudyonwomensexperiences
AT bekkermn homebasedtelemonitoringversushospitaladmissioninhighriskpregnanciesaqualitativestudyonwomensexperiences