Cargando…

Impact, challenges and limits of inpatient palliative care consultations – perspectives of requesting and conducting physicians

BACKGROUND: Inpatient palliative care consultation (IPCC) teams have been established to improve care for patients with specialist palliative care (PC) needs throughout all hospital departments. The objective is to explore physicians’ perceptions on the impact of IPCC, its triggers, challenges and l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coym, Anja, Oechsle, Karin, Kanitz, Alena, Puls, Nora, Blum, David, Bokemeyer, Carsten, Ullrich, Anneke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32019562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4936-x
_version_ 1783494201535627264
author Coym, Anja
Oechsle, Karin
Kanitz, Alena
Puls, Nora
Blum, David
Bokemeyer, Carsten
Ullrich, Anneke
author_facet Coym, Anja
Oechsle, Karin
Kanitz, Alena
Puls, Nora
Blum, David
Bokemeyer, Carsten
Ullrich, Anneke
author_sort Coym, Anja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inpatient palliative care consultation (IPCC) teams have been established to improve care for patients with specialist palliative care (PC) needs throughout all hospital departments. The objective is to explore physicians’ perceptions on the impact of IPCC, its triggers, challenges and limits, and their suggestions for future service improvements. METHODS: A Qualitative study drawing on semi-structured interviews with 10 PC specialists of an IPCC team and nine IPCC requesting physicians from oncology and non-oncological departments of a university hospital. Analysis was performed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: PC specialists and IPCC requesting physicians likewise considered organization of further care and symptom-burden as main reasons for IPCC requests. The main impact however was identified from both as improvement of patients’ (and their caregivers’) coping strategies and relief of the treating team. Mostly, PC specialists emphasized a reduction of symptom burden, and improvement of further care. Challenges in implementing IPCC were lack of time for both. PC specialists addressed requesting physicians’ skepticism towards PC. Barriers for realization of IPCC included structural aspects for both: limited time, staff capacities and setting. PC specialists saw problems in implementing recommendations like disagreement towards their suggestions. All interviewees considered education in PC a sensible approach for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: IPCC show various positive effects in supporting physicians and patients, but are also limited due to structural problems, lack of knowledge, insecurity, and skepticism by the requesting physicians. To overcome some of these challenges implementation of PC education programs for all physicians would be beneficial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7001248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70012482020-02-10 Impact, challenges and limits of inpatient palliative care consultations – perspectives of requesting and conducting physicians Coym, Anja Oechsle, Karin Kanitz, Alena Puls, Nora Blum, David Bokemeyer, Carsten Ullrich, Anneke BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Inpatient palliative care consultation (IPCC) teams have been established to improve care for patients with specialist palliative care (PC) needs throughout all hospital departments. The objective is to explore physicians’ perceptions on the impact of IPCC, its triggers, challenges and limits, and their suggestions for future service improvements. METHODS: A Qualitative study drawing on semi-structured interviews with 10 PC specialists of an IPCC team and nine IPCC requesting physicians from oncology and non-oncological departments of a university hospital. Analysis was performed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: PC specialists and IPCC requesting physicians likewise considered organization of further care and symptom-burden as main reasons for IPCC requests. The main impact however was identified from both as improvement of patients’ (and their caregivers’) coping strategies and relief of the treating team. Mostly, PC specialists emphasized a reduction of symptom burden, and improvement of further care. Challenges in implementing IPCC were lack of time for both. PC specialists addressed requesting physicians’ skepticism towards PC. Barriers for realization of IPCC included structural aspects for both: limited time, staff capacities and setting. PC specialists saw problems in implementing recommendations like disagreement towards their suggestions. All interviewees considered education in PC a sensible approach for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: IPCC show various positive effects in supporting physicians and patients, but are also limited due to structural problems, lack of knowledge, insecurity, and skepticism by the requesting physicians. To overcome some of these challenges implementation of PC education programs for all physicians would be beneficial. BioMed Central 2020-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7001248/ /pubmed/32019562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4936-x Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Coym, Anja
Oechsle, Karin
Kanitz, Alena
Puls, Nora
Blum, David
Bokemeyer, Carsten
Ullrich, Anneke
Impact, challenges and limits of inpatient palliative care consultations – perspectives of requesting and conducting physicians
title Impact, challenges and limits of inpatient palliative care consultations – perspectives of requesting and conducting physicians
title_full Impact, challenges and limits of inpatient palliative care consultations – perspectives of requesting and conducting physicians
title_fullStr Impact, challenges and limits of inpatient palliative care consultations – perspectives of requesting and conducting physicians
title_full_unstemmed Impact, challenges and limits of inpatient palliative care consultations – perspectives of requesting and conducting physicians
title_short Impact, challenges and limits of inpatient palliative care consultations – perspectives of requesting and conducting physicians
title_sort impact, challenges and limits of inpatient palliative care consultations – perspectives of requesting and conducting physicians
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32019562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4936-x
work_keys_str_mv AT coymanja impactchallengesandlimitsofinpatientpalliativecareconsultationsperspectivesofrequestingandconductingphysicians
AT oechslekarin impactchallengesandlimitsofinpatientpalliativecareconsultationsperspectivesofrequestingandconductingphysicians
AT kanitzalena impactchallengesandlimitsofinpatientpalliativecareconsultationsperspectivesofrequestingandconductingphysicians
AT pulsnora impactchallengesandlimitsofinpatientpalliativecareconsultationsperspectivesofrequestingandconductingphysicians
AT blumdavid impactchallengesandlimitsofinpatientpalliativecareconsultationsperspectivesofrequestingandconductingphysicians
AT bokemeyercarsten impactchallengesandlimitsofinpatientpalliativecareconsultationsperspectivesofrequestingandconductingphysicians
AT ullrichanneke impactchallengesandlimitsofinpatientpalliativecareconsultationsperspectivesofrequestingandconductingphysicians