Cargando…

Shared decision making with oncologists and palliative care specialists effectively increases the documentation of the preferences for do not resuscitate and artificial nutrition and hydration in patients with advanced cancer: a model testing study

BACKGROUND: Communication in do not resuscitate (DNR) and artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) at the end of life is a key component of advance care planning (ACP) which is essential for patients with advanced cancer to have cares concordant with their wishes. The SOP model (Shared decision maki...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Hsien-Liang, Tsai, Jaw-Shiun, Yao, Chien-An, Cheng, Shao-Yi, Hu, Wen-Yu, Chiu, Tai-Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32019540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-0521-7
_version_ 1783494232276729856
author Huang, Hsien-Liang
Tsai, Jaw-Shiun
Yao, Chien-An
Cheng, Shao-Yi
Hu, Wen-Yu
Chiu, Tai-Yuan
author_facet Huang, Hsien-Liang
Tsai, Jaw-Shiun
Yao, Chien-An
Cheng, Shao-Yi
Hu, Wen-Yu
Chiu, Tai-Yuan
author_sort Huang, Hsien-Liang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Communication in do not resuscitate (DNR) and artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) at the end of life is a key component of advance care planning (ACP) which is essential for patients with advanced cancer to have cares concordant with their wishes. The SOP model (Shared decision making with Oncologists and Palliative care specialists) aimed to increase the rate of documentation on the preferences for DNR and ANH in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: The SOP model was implemented in a national cancer treatment center in Taiwan from September 2016 to August 2018 for patients with advanced cancer visiting the oncology outpatient clinic. The framework was based on the model of shared decision making as “choice talk” initiated by oncologists with “option talk” and “decision talk” conducted by palliative care specialists. RESULTS: Among 375 eligible patients, 255 patients (68%) participated in the model testing with the mean age of 68.5 ± 14.7 years (mean ± SD). Comparing to 52.3% of DNR documentation among patients with advanced cancer who died in our hospital, the rate increased to 80.9% (206/255) after the decision talk in our model. Only 6.67% (n = 17) of the participants documented their preferences on ANH after the model. A worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status was the only statistically significant associating factor with a higher rate of DNR documentation in the multiple logistic regression model. CONCLUSIONS: The SOP model significantly increased the rate of DNR documentation in patients with advanced cancer in this pilot study. Dissemination of the model could help the patients to receive care that is concordant with their wishes and be useful for the countries having laws on ACP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7001377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70013772020-02-10 Shared decision making with oncologists and palliative care specialists effectively increases the documentation of the preferences for do not resuscitate and artificial nutrition and hydration in patients with advanced cancer: a model testing study Huang, Hsien-Liang Tsai, Jaw-Shiun Yao, Chien-An Cheng, Shao-Yi Hu, Wen-Yu Chiu, Tai-Yuan BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Communication in do not resuscitate (DNR) and artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) at the end of life is a key component of advance care planning (ACP) which is essential for patients with advanced cancer to have cares concordant with their wishes. The SOP model (Shared decision making with Oncologists and Palliative care specialists) aimed to increase the rate of documentation on the preferences for DNR and ANH in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: The SOP model was implemented in a national cancer treatment center in Taiwan from September 2016 to August 2018 for patients with advanced cancer visiting the oncology outpatient clinic. The framework was based on the model of shared decision making as “choice talk” initiated by oncologists with “option talk” and “decision talk” conducted by palliative care specialists. RESULTS: Among 375 eligible patients, 255 patients (68%) participated in the model testing with the mean age of 68.5 ± 14.7 years (mean ± SD). Comparing to 52.3% of DNR documentation among patients with advanced cancer who died in our hospital, the rate increased to 80.9% (206/255) after the decision talk in our model. Only 6.67% (n = 17) of the participants documented their preferences on ANH after the model. A worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status was the only statistically significant associating factor with a higher rate of DNR documentation in the multiple logistic regression model. CONCLUSIONS: The SOP model significantly increased the rate of DNR documentation in patients with advanced cancer in this pilot study. Dissemination of the model could help the patients to receive care that is concordant with their wishes and be useful for the countries having laws on ACP. BioMed Central 2020-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7001377/ /pubmed/32019540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-0521-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huang, Hsien-Liang
Tsai, Jaw-Shiun
Yao, Chien-An
Cheng, Shao-Yi
Hu, Wen-Yu
Chiu, Tai-Yuan
Shared decision making with oncologists and palliative care specialists effectively increases the documentation of the preferences for do not resuscitate and artificial nutrition and hydration in patients with advanced cancer: a model testing study
title Shared decision making with oncologists and palliative care specialists effectively increases the documentation of the preferences for do not resuscitate and artificial nutrition and hydration in patients with advanced cancer: a model testing study
title_full Shared decision making with oncologists and palliative care specialists effectively increases the documentation of the preferences for do not resuscitate and artificial nutrition and hydration in patients with advanced cancer: a model testing study
title_fullStr Shared decision making with oncologists and palliative care specialists effectively increases the documentation of the preferences for do not resuscitate and artificial nutrition and hydration in patients with advanced cancer: a model testing study
title_full_unstemmed Shared decision making with oncologists and palliative care specialists effectively increases the documentation of the preferences for do not resuscitate and artificial nutrition and hydration in patients with advanced cancer: a model testing study
title_short Shared decision making with oncologists and palliative care specialists effectively increases the documentation of the preferences for do not resuscitate and artificial nutrition and hydration in patients with advanced cancer: a model testing study
title_sort shared decision making with oncologists and palliative care specialists effectively increases the documentation of the preferences for do not resuscitate and artificial nutrition and hydration in patients with advanced cancer: a model testing study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32019540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-0521-7
work_keys_str_mv AT huanghsienliang shareddecisionmakingwithoncologistsandpalliativecarespecialistseffectivelyincreasesthedocumentationofthepreferencesfordonotresuscitateandartificialnutritionandhydrationinpatientswithadvancedcanceramodeltestingstudy
AT tsaijawshiun shareddecisionmakingwithoncologistsandpalliativecarespecialistseffectivelyincreasesthedocumentationofthepreferencesfordonotresuscitateandartificialnutritionandhydrationinpatientswithadvancedcanceramodeltestingstudy
AT yaochienan shareddecisionmakingwithoncologistsandpalliativecarespecialistseffectivelyincreasesthedocumentationofthepreferencesfordonotresuscitateandartificialnutritionandhydrationinpatientswithadvancedcanceramodeltestingstudy
AT chengshaoyi shareddecisionmakingwithoncologistsandpalliativecarespecialistseffectivelyincreasesthedocumentationofthepreferencesfordonotresuscitateandartificialnutritionandhydrationinpatientswithadvancedcanceramodeltestingstudy
AT huwenyu shareddecisionmakingwithoncologistsandpalliativecarespecialistseffectivelyincreasesthedocumentationofthepreferencesfordonotresuscitateandartificialnutritionandhydrationinpatientswithadvancedcanceramodeltestingstudy
AT chiutaiyuan shareddecisionmakingwithoncologistsandpalliativecarespecialistseffectivelyincreasesthedocumentationofthepreferencesfordonotresuscitateandartificialnutritionandhydrationinpatientswithadvancedcanceramodeltestingstudy