Cargando…
Comparison of the current international guidelines on the management of HCC
The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become ever more demanding. To evaluate the available evidence and to give clinicians the best guidance, all major hepatology societies have developed guidelines for HCC. Recently, updated versions have been published by the American, the Asian Pa...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32039359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2019.04.005 |
_version_ | 1783494261950382080 |
---|---|
author | Foerster, Friedrich Galle, Peter Robert |
author_facet | Foerster, Friedrich Galle, Peter Robert |
author_sort | Foerster, Friedrich |
collection | PubMed |
description | The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become ever more demanding. To evaluate the available evidence and to give clinicians the best guidance, all major hepatology societies have developed guidelines for HCC. Recently, updated versions have been published by the American, the Asian Pacific, and the European societies. This article presents a comparison of these three guidelines summarising both common ground and differences. Moreover, it highlights areas of ongoing research which will make yet another round of updates of the guidelines necessary in the near future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7001540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70015402020-02-07 Comparison of the current international guidelines on the management of HCC Foerster, Friedrich Galle, Peter Robert JHEP Rep Review The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become ever more demanding. To evaluate the available evidence and to give clinicians the best guidance, all major hepatology societies have developed guidelines for HCC. Recently, updated versions have been published by the American, the Asian Pacific, and the European societies. This article presents a comparison of these three guidelines summarising both common ground and differences. Moreover, it highlights areas of ongoing research which will make yet another round of updates of the guidelines necessary in the near future. Elsevier 2019-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7001540/ /pubmed/32039359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2019.04.005 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Foerster, Friedrich Galle, Peter Robert Comparison of the current international guidelines on the management of HCC |
title | Comparison of the current international guidelines on the management of HCC |
title_full | Comparison of the current international guidelines on the management of HCC |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the current international guidelines on the management of HCC |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the current international guidelines on the management of HCC |
title_short | Comparison of the current international guidelines on the management of HCC |
title_sort | comparison of the current international guidelines on the management of hcc |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32039359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2019.04.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foersterfriedrich comparisonofthecurrentinternationalguidelinesonthemanagementofhcc AT gallepeterrobert comparisonofthecurrentinternationalguidelinesonthemanagementofhcc |