Cargando…

Utilization of ACP CPT codes among high-need Medicare beneficiaries in 2017: A brief report

IMPORTANCE: Medicare beneficiaries with high medical needs can benefit from Advance Care Planning (ACP). Medicare reimburses clinical providers for ACP discussions, but it is unknown whether high-need beneficiaries are receiving this service. OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of billed ACP discussions amo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reich, Amanda J., Jin, Ginger, Gupta, Avni, Kim, Dae, Lipstiz, Stuart, Prigerson, Holly G., Tjia, Jennifer, Ladin, Keren, Halpern, Scott D., Cooper, Zara, Weissman, Joel S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32023311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228553
_version_ 1783494313540321280
author Reich, Amanda J.
Jin, Ginger
Gupta, Avni
Kim, Dae
Lipstiz, Stuart
Prigerson, Holly G.
Tjia, Jennifer
Ladin, Keren
Halpern, Scott D.
Cooper, Zara
Weissman, Joel S.
author_facet Reich, Amanda J.
Jin, Ginger
Gupta, Avni
Kim, Dae
Lipstiz, Stuart
Prigerson, Holly G.
Tjia, Jennifer
Ladin, Keren
Halpern, Scott D.
Cooper, Zara
Weissman, Joel S.
author_sort Reich, Amanda J.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Medicare beneficiaries with high medical needs can benefit from Advance Care Planning (ACP). Medicare reimburses clinical providers for ACP discussions, but it is unknown whether high-need beneficiaries are receiving this service. OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of billed ACP discussions among a cohort of high-need Medicare beneficiaries with the non-high-needs Medicare population. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) claims in 2017 comparing high-need beneficiaries (seriously ill, frail, ESRD, and disabled) with non-high need beneficiaries. SETTING: Nationally representative FFS Medicare 20% sample PARTICIPANTS: Medicare beneficiaries were assigned to one of the following classifications: seriously ill (65+), frail (65+), seriously ill & frail (65+); non-high need (65+); end stage renal disease (ESRD) or disabled (<65). All participants had data available for years 2016–2017. EXPOSURE: Receipt of a billed ACP discussion, CPT codes 99497 or 99498. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: Rates of billed ACP visits were compared between high-need patients and non-high-need patients. Rates were adjusted for the 65+ population for sex, age, race/ethnicity, Charlson comorbidity index, Medicare/Medicaid dual eligibility status, and Hospital Referral Region. RESULTS: Among the 65+ groups, those most likely to have a billed ACP discussion included seriously ill & frail (5.2%), seriously ill (4.2%), and frail (3.3%). Rates remained consistent after adjusting (4.5%, 4.0%, 3.1%, respectively). Each subgroup differed significantly (p < .05) from non-high need beneficiaries (2.3%) in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Among the <65 high need groups, the rates were 2.7% for ESRD and 1.3% for the disabled (the latter p < .05 compared with non-high needs). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: While rates of billed ACP discussions varied among patient groups with high medical needs, overall they were relatively low, even among a cohort of patients for whom ACP may be especially relevant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7001931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70019312020-02-18 Utilization of ACP CPT codes among high-need Medicare beneficiaries in 2017: A brief report Reich, Amanda J. Jin, Ginger Gupta, Avni Kim, Dae Lipstiz, Stuart Prigerson, Holly G. Tjia, Jennifer Ladin, Keren Halpern, Scott D. Cooper, Zara Weissman, Joel S. PLoS One Research Article IMPORTANCE: Medicare beneficiaries with high medical needs can benefit from Advance Care Planning (ACP). Medicare reimburses clinical providers for ACP discussions, but it is unknown whether high-need beneficiaries are receiving this service. OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of billed ACP discussions among a cohort of high-need Medicare beneficiaries with the non-high-needs Medicare population. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) claims in 2017 comparing high-need beneficiaries (seriously ill, frail, ESRD, and disabled) with non-high need beneficiaries. SETTING: Nationally representative FFS Medicare 20% sample PARTICIPANTS: Medicare beneficiaries were assigned to one of the following classifications: seriously ill (65+), frail (65+), seriously ill & frail (65+); non-high need (65+); end stage renal disease (ESRD) or disabled (<65). All participants had data available for years 2016–2017. EXPOSURE: Receipt of a billed ACP discussion, CPT codes 99497 or 99498. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: Rates of billed ACP visits were compared between high-need patients and non-high-need patients. Rates were adjusted for the 65+ population for sex, age, race/ethnicity, Charlson comorbidity index, Medicare/Medicaid dual eligibility status, and Hospital Referral Region. RESULTS: Among the 65+ groups, those most likely to have a billed ACP discussion included seriously ill & frail (5.2%), seriously ill (4.2%), and frail (3.3%). Rates remained consistent after adjusting (4.5%, 4.0%, 3.1%, respectively). Each subgroup differed significantly (p < .05) from non-high need beneficiaries (2.3%) in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Among the <65 high need groups, the rates were 2.7% for ESRD and 1.3% for the disabled (the latter p < .05 compared with non-high needs). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: While rates of billed ACP discussions varied among patient groups with high medical needs, overall they were relatively low, even among a cohort of patients for whom ACP may be especially relevant. Public Library of Science 2020-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7001931/ /pubmed/32023311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228553 Text en © 2020 Reich et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reich, Amanda J.
Jin, Ginger
Gupta, Avni
Kim, Dae
Lipstiz, Stuart
Prigerson, Holly G.
Tjia, Jennifer
Ladin, Keren
Halpern, Scott D.
Cooper, Zara
Weissman, Joel S.
Utilization of ACP CPT codes among high-need Medicare beneficiaries in 2017: A brief report
title Utilization of ACP CPT codes among high-need Medicare beneficiaries in 2017: A brief report
title_full Utilization of ACP CPT codes among high-need Medicare beneficiaries in 2017: A brief report
title_fullStr Utilization of ACP CPT codes among high-need Medicare beneficiaries in 2017: A brief report
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of ACP CPT codes among high-need Medicare beneficiaries in 2017: A brief report
title_short Utilization of ACP CPT codes among high-need Medicare beneficiaries in 2017: A brief report
title_sort utilization of acp cpt codes among high-need medicare beneficiaries in 2017: a brief report
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32023311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228553
work_keys_str_mv AT reichamandaj utilizationofacpcptcodesamonghighneedmedicarebeneficiariesin2017abriefreport
AT jinginger utilizationofacpcptcodesamonghighneedmedicarebeneficiariesin2017abriefreport
AT guptaavni utilizationofacpcptcodesamonghighneedmedicarebeneficiariesin2017abriefreport
AT kimdae utilizationofacpcptcodesamonghighneedmedicarebeneficiariesin2017abriefreport
AT lipstizstuart utilizationofacpcptcodesamonghighneedmedicarebeneficiariesin2017abriefreport
AT prigersonhollyg utilizationofacpcptcodesamonghighneedmedicarebeneficiariesin2017abriefreport
AT tjiajennifer utilizationofacpcptcodesamonghighneedmedicarebeneficiariesin2017abriefreport
AT ladinkeren utilizationofacpcptcodesamonghighneedmedicarebeneficiariesin2017abriefreport
AT halpernscottd utilizationofacpcptcodesamonghighneedmedicarebeneficiariesin2017abriefreport
AT cooperzara utilizationofacpcptcodesamonghighneedmedicarebeneficiariesin2017abriefreport
AT weissmanjoels utilizationofacpcptcodesamonghighneedmedicarebeneficiariesin2017abriefreport