Cargando…

Friendship paradox biases perceptions in directed networks

Social networks shape perceptions by exposing people to the actions and opinions of their peers. However, the perceived popularity of a trait or an opinion may be very different from its actual popularity. We attribute this perception bias to friendship paradox and identify conditions under which it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alipourfard, Nazanin, Nettasinghe, Buddhika, Abeliuk, Andrés, Krishnamurthy, Vikram, Lerman, Kristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7002371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32024843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14394-x
_version_ 1783494364330196992
author Alipourfard, Nazanin
Nettasinghe, Buddhika
Abeliuk, Andrés
Krishnamurthy, Vikram
Lerman, Kristina
author_facet Alipourfard, Nazanin
Nettasinghe, Buddhika
Abeliuk, Andrés
Krishnamurthy, Vikram
Lerman, Kristina
author_sort Alipourfard, Nazanin
collection PubMed
description Social networks shape perceptions by exposing people to the actions and opinions of their peers. However, the perceived popularity of a trait or an opinion may be very different from its actual popularity. We attribute this perception bias to friendship paradox and identify conditions under which it appears. We validate the findings empirically using Twitter data. Within posts made by users in our sample, we identify topics that appear more often within users’ social feeds than they do globally among all posts. We also present a polling algorithm that leverages the friendship paradox to obtain a statistically efficient estimate of a topic’s global prevalence from biased individual perceptions. We characterize the polling estimate and validate it through synthetic polling experiments on Twitter data. Our paper elucidates the non-intuitive ways in which the structure of directed networks can distort perceptions and presents approaches to mitigate this bias.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7002371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70023712020-02-07 Friendship paradox biases perceptions in directed networks Alipourfard, Nazanin Nettasinghe, Buddhika Abeliuk, Andrés Krishnamurthy, Vikram Lerman, Kristina Nat Commun Article Social networks shape perceptions by exposing people to the actions and opinions of their peers. However, the perceived popularity of a trait or an opinion may be very different from its actual popularity. We attribute this perception bias to friendship paradox and identify conditions under which it appears. We validate the findings empirically using Twitter data. Within posts made by users in our sample, we identify topics that appear more often within users’ social feeds than they do globally among all posts. We also present a polling algorithm that leverages the friendship paradox to obtain a statistically efficient estimate of a topic’s global prevalence from biased individual perceptions. We characterize the polling estimate and validate it through synthetic polling experiments on Twitter data. Our paper elucidates the non-intuitive ways in which the structure of directed networks can distort perceptions and presents approaches to mitigate this bias. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7002371/ /pubmed/32024843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14394-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Alipourfard, Nazanin
Nettasinghe, Buddhika
Abeliuk, Andrés
Krishnamurthy, Vikram
Lerman, Kristina
Friendship paradox biases perceptions in directed networks
title Friendship paradox biases perceptions in directed networks
title_full Friendship paradox biases perceptions in directed networks
title_fullStr Friendship paradox biases perceptions in directed networks
title_full_unstemmed Friendship paradox biases perceptions in directed networks
title_short Friendship paradox biases perceptions in directed networks
title_sort friendship paradox biases perceptions in directed networks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7002371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32024843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14394-x
work_keys_str_mv AT alipourfardnazanin friendshipparadoxbiasesperceptionsindirectednetworks
AT nettasinghebuddhika friendshipparadoxbiasesperceptionsindirectednetworks
AT abeliukandres friendshipparadoxbiasesperceptionsindirectednetworks
AT krishnamurthyvikram friendshipparadoxbiasesperceptionsindirectednetworks
AT lermankristina friendshipparadoxbiasesperceptionsindirectednetworks