Cargando…

Patient preferences regarding bariatric/metabolic procedures: a survey of Korean obese candidates for surgery

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to survey potential candidates for bariatric/metabolic surgery for procedure preferences. METHODS: Questions asked were divided into 5 categories: (1) demographic and anthropometric data, comorbidities, and favored surgery; (2) awareness of safety, effectiven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roh, Su Yeon, Park, Yeon Ho, Lee, Woon Ki, Kim, Seong Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Surgical Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7002879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32051816
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2020.98.2.82
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to survey potential candidates for bariatric/metabolic surgery for procedure preferences. METHODS: Questions asked were divided into 5 categories: (1) demographic and anthropometric data, comorbidities, and favored surgery; (2) awareness of safety, effectiveness, and complications of each type of surgery; (3) discordances in opinion between self-selected and medically recommended procedures; and (4, 5) reasons for/against particular surgery. RESULTS: From 1 October to 15 November 2018, 104 respondents adequately responded and were included in the analysis. The number (%) of female respondents was 79 (76.0%). The number (%) of respondents by decade was 17 (16.3%) in their 20s, 65 (62.5%) in their 30s, 19 (18.3%) in their 40s, and 3 (2.9%) in their 60s, respectively. Mean body mass index was 37.1 ± 6.3 kg/m(2). Comorbidities were type 2 diabetes in 34 (32.7%) and hypertension in 35 (33.7%). The most favored procedure was sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in 78 (75.0%), adjustable gastric band (AGB) surgery in 12 (11.5%), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in 6 (5.8%), and gastric plication (GP) in 8 (7.7%). Major reasons for choosing procedures were; “adjustable” for AGB, “stomach sparing” for GP, “excellent weight loss” for SG, and “comorbidity resolution” in RYGB. CONCLUSION: Candidates for bariatric/metabolic surgery favored SG followed by AGB, GP, and RYGB, and their choices were compatible with current evidence-based clinical practice.