Cargando…

Reliability and validity of the self-reported frailty screening questionnaire in older adults

BACKGROUND: Frailty is one of the most important risk factors for adverse outcomes in older adults. Despite a high prevalence, there is still a lack of frailty screening instruments specific to Chinese older adults. We developed a simple frailty screening questionnaire (FSQ) that could predict long-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yanhong, Zhang, Yaxin, Li, Yun, Chan, Piu, Ma, Lina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040622320904278
_version_ 1783494487977230336
author Zhang, Yanhong
Zhang, Yaxin
Li, Yun
Chan, Piu
Ma, Lina
author_facet Zhang, Yanhong
Zhang, Yaxin
Li, Yun
Chan, Piu
Ma, Lina
author_sort Zhang, Yanhong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Frailty is one of the most important risk factors for adverse outcomes in older adults. Despite a high prevalence, there is still a lack of frailty screening instruments specific to Chinese older adults. We developed a simple frailty screening questionnaire (FSQ) that could predict long-term mortality. We aimed to explore the reliability and construct validity of this new measurement tool. METHODS: A total of 205 individuals aged 65 years or older were recruited in this study. The FSQ and frailty phenotype were assessed. The FSQ included self-reported slowness, weakness, weight loss, inactivity, and exhaustion. A subgroup of 109 participants completed the FSQ a second time 2 weeks later for test–retest reliability. Frailty phenotype included slowness, exhaustion, weight loss, weakness, and inactivity. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient for the FSQ, slowness, weakness, weight loss, inactivity and exhaustion were 0.937, 0.938, 0.934, 0.921, 0.826, and 0.832, respectively. Using a cut-off of 3, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic were 52.6%, 93.5%, and 0.883 (p < 0.001), respectively. The kappa coefficient between the FSQ and frailty phenotype was 0.431 (p < 0.001). FSQ score was negatively correlated with walking speed and grip strength, and positively correlated with age. Frailty defined by the FSQ was associated with older age, chronic diseases, and worse physical function. CONCLUSIONS: The FSQ is a potentially useful, reliable, and valid instrument in screening frailty in older adults, and can be recommended to identify frailty in clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7003165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70031652020-02-19 Reliability and validity of the self-reported frailty screening questionnaire in older adults Zhang, Yanhong Zhang, Yaxin Li, Yun Chan, Piu Ma, Lina Ther Adv Chronic Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Frailty is one of the most important risk factors for adverse outcomes in older adults. Despite a high prevalence, there is still a lack of frailty screening instruments specific to Chinese older adults. We developed a simple frailty screening questionnaire (FSQ) that could predict long-term mortality. We aimed to explore the reliability and construct validity of this new measurement tool. METHODS: A total of 205 individuals aged 65 years or older were recruited in this study. The FSQ and frailty phenotype were assessed. The FSQ included self-reported slowness, weakness, weight loss, inactivity, and exhaustion. A subgroup of 109 participants completed the FSQ a second time 2 weeks later for test–retest reliability. Frailty phenotype included slowness, exhaustion, weight loss, weakness, and inactivity. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient for the FSQ, slowness, weakness, weight loss, inactivity and exhaustion were 0.937, 0.938, 0.934, 0.921, 0.826, and 0.832, respectively. Using a cut-off of 3, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic were 52.6%, 93.5%, and 0.883 (p < 0.001), respectively. The kappa coefficient between the FSQ and frailty phenotype was 0.431 (p < 0.001). FSQ score was negatively correlated with walking speed and grip strength, and positively correlated with age. Frailty defined by the FSQ was associated with older age, chronic diseases, and worse physical function. CONCLUSIONS: The FSQ is a potentially useful, reliable, and valid instrument in screening frailty in older adults, and can be recommended to identify frailty in clinical settings. SAGE Publications 2020-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7003165/ /pubmed/32076498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040622320904278 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Zhang, Yanhong
Zhang, Yaxin
Li, Yun
Chan, Piu
Ma, Lina
Reliability and validity of the self-reported frailty screening questionnaire in older adults
title Reliability and validity of the self-reported frailty screening questionnaire in older adults
title_full Reliability and validity of the self-reported frailty screening questionnaire in older adults
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of the self-reported frailty screening questionnaire in older adults
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of the self-reported frailty screening questionnaire in older adults
title_short Reliability and validity of the self-reported frailty screening questionnaire in older adults
title_sort reliability and validity of the self-reported frailty screening questionnaire in older adults
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040622320904278
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyanhong reliabilityandvalidityoftheselfreportedfrailtyscreeningquestionnaireinolderadults
AT zhangyaxin reliabilityandvalidityoftheselfreportedfrailtyscreeningquestionnaireinolderadults
AT liyun reliabilityandvalidityoftheselfreportedfrailtyscreeningquestionnaireinolderadults
AT chanpiu reliabilityandvalidityoftheselfreportedfrailtyscreeningquestionnaireinolderadults
AT malina reliabilityandvalidityoftheselfreportedfrailtyscreeningquestionnaireinolderadults