Cargando…
Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania
INTRODUCTION: Measuring quality of care in low-income and middle-income countries is complicated by the lack of a standard, universally accepted definition for ‘quality’ for any particular service, as well as limited guidance on which indicators to include in measures of quality of care, and how to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31796487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032558 |
_version_ | 1783494522314948608 |
---|---|
author | Sheffel, Ashley Zeger, Scott Heidkamp, Rebecca Munos, Melinda Kay |
author_facet | Sheffel, Ashley Zeger, Scott Heidkamp, Rebecca Munos, Melinda Kay |
author_sort | Sheffel, Ashley |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Measuring quality of care in low-income and middle-income countries is complicated by the lack of a standard, universally accepted definition for ‘quality’ for any particular service, as well as limited guidance on which indicators to include in measures of quality of care, and how to incorporate those indicators into summary indices. The aim of this paper is to develop, characterise and compare a set of antenatal care (ANC) indices for facility readiness and provision of care. METHODS: We created nine indices for facility readiness using three methods for selecting items and three methods for combining items. In addition, we created three indices for provision of care using one method for selecting items and three methods for combining items. For each index, we calculated descriptive statistics, categorised the continuous index scores using tercile cut points to assess comparability of facility classification, and examined the variability and distribution of scores. RESULTS: Our results showed that, within a country, the indices were quite similar in terms of mean index score, facility classification, coefficient of variation, floor and ceiling effects, and the inclusion of items in an index with a range of variability. Notably, the indices created using principal components analysis to combine the items were the most different from the other indices. In addition, the index created by taking a weighted average of a core set of items had lower agreement with the other indices when looking at facility classification. CONCLUSIONS: As improving quality of care becomes integral to global efforts to produce better health outcomes, demand for guidance on creating standardised measures of service quality will grow. This study provides health systems researchers with a comparison of methodologies commonly used to create summary indices of ANC service quality and it highlights the similarities and differences between methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7003378 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70033782020-02-25 Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania Sheffel, Ashley Zeger, Scott Heidkamp, Rebecca Munos, Melinda Kay BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Measuring quality of care in low-income and middle-income countries is complicated by the lack of a standard, universally accepted definition for ‘quality’ for any particular service, as well as limited guidance on which indicators to include in measures of quality of care, and how to incorporate those indicators into summary indices. The aim of this paper is to develop, characterise and compare a set of antenatal care (ANC) indices for facility readiness and provision of care. METHODS: We created nine indices for facility readiness using three methods for selecting items and three methods for combining items. In addition, we created three indices for provision of care using one method for selecting items and three methods for combining items. For each index, we calculated descriptive statistics, categorised the continuous index scores using tercile cut points to assess comparability of facility classification, and examined the variability and distribution of scores. RESULTS: Our results showed that, within a country, the indices were quite similar in terms of mean index score, facility classification, coefficient of variation, floor and ceiling effects, and the inclusion of items in an index with a range of variability. Notably, the indices created using principal components analysis to combine the items were the most different from the other indices. In addition, the index created by taking a weighted average of a core set of items had lower agreement with the other indices when looking at facility classification. CONCLUSIONS: As improving quality of care becomes integral to global efforts to produce better health outcomes, demand for guidance on creating standardised measures of service quality will grow. This study provides health systems researchers with a comparison of methodologies commonly used to create summary indices of ANC service quality and it highlights the similarities and differences between methods. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7003378/ /pubmed/31796487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032558 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Sheffel, Ashley Zeger, Scott Heidkamp, Rebecca Munos, Melinda Kay Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania |
title | Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania |
title_full | Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania |
title_fullStr | Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania |
title_short | Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania |
title_sort | development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in haiti, malawi and tanzania |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31796487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032558 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sheffelashley developmentofsummaryindicesofantenatalcareservicequalityinhaitimalawiandtanzania AT zegerscott developmentofsummaryindicesofantenatalcareservicequalityinhaitimalawiandtanzania AT heidkamprebecca developmentofsummaryindicesofantenatalcareservicequalityinhaitimalawiandtanzania AT munosmelindakay developmentofsummaryindicesofantenatalcareservicequalityinhaitimalawiandtanzania |