Cargando…

Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania

INTRODUCTION: Measuring quality of care in low-income and middle-income countries is complicated by the lack of a standard, universally accepted definition for ‘quality’ for any particular service, as well as limited guidance on which indicators to include in measures of quality of care, and how to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheffel, Ashley, Zeger, Scott, Heidkamp, Rebecca, Munos, Melinda Kay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31796487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032558
_version_ 1783494522314948608
author Sheffel, Ashley
Zeger, Scott
Heidkamp, Rebecca
Munos, Melinda Kay
author_facet Sheffel, Ashley
Zeger, Scott
Heidkamp, Rebecca
Munos, Melinda Kay
author_sort Sheffel, Ashley
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Measuring quality of care in low-income and middle-income countries is complicated by the lack of a standard, universally accepted definition for ‘quality’ for any particular service, as well as limited guidance on which indicators to include in measures of quality of care, and how to incorporate those indicators into summary indices. The aim of this paper is to develop, characterise and compare a set of antenatal care (ANC) indices for facility readiness and provision of care. METHODS: We created nine indices for facility readiness using three methods for selecting items and three methods for combining items. In addition, we created three indices for provision of care using one method for selecting items and three methods for combining items. For each index, we calculated descriptive statistics, categorised the continuous index scores using tercile cut points to assess comparability of facility classification, and examined the variability and distribution of scores. RESULTS: Our results showed that, within a country, the indices were quite similar in terms of mean index score, facility classification, coefficient of variation, floor and ceiling effects, and the inclusion of items in an index with a range of variability. Notably, the indices created using principal components analysis to combine the items were the most different from the other indices. In addition, the index created by taking a weighted average of a core set of items had lower agreement with the other indices when looking at facility classification. CONCLUSIONS: As improving quality of care becomes integral to global efforts to produce better health outcomes, demand for guidance on creating standardised measures of service quality will grow. This study provides health systems researchers with a comparison of methodologies commonly used to create summary indices of ANC service quality and it highlights the similarities and differences between methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7003378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70033782020-02-25 Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania Sheffel, Ashley Zeger, Scott Heidkamp, Rebecca Munos, Melinda Kay BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Measuring quality of care in low-income and middle-income countries is complicated by the lack of a standard, universally accepted definition for ‘quality’ for any particular service, as well as limited guidance on which indicators to include in measures of quality of care, and how to incorporate those indicators into summary indices. The aim of this paper is to develop, characterise and compare a set of antenatal care (ANC) indices for facility readiness and provision of care. METHODS: We created nine indices for facility readiness using three methods for selecting items and three methods for combining items. In addition, we created three indices for provision of care using one method for selecting items and three methods for combining items. For each index, we calculated descriptive statistics, categorised the continuous index scores using tercile cut points to assess comparability of facility classification, and examined the variability and distribution of scores. RESULTS: Our results showed that, within a country, the indices were quite similar in terms of mean index score, facility classification, coefficient of variation, floor and ceiling effects, and the inclusion of items in an index with a range of variability. Notably, the indices created using principal components analysis to combine the items were the most different from the other indices. In addition, the index created by taking a weighted average of a core set of items had lower agreement with the other indices when looking at facility classification. CONCLUSIONS: As improving quality of care becomes integral to global efforts to produce better health outcomes, demand for guidance on creating standardised measures of service quality will grow. This study provides health systems researchers with a comparison of methodologies commonly used to create summary indices of ANC service quality and it highlights the similarities and differences between methods. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7003378/ /pubmed/31796487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032558 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Sheffel, Ashley
Zeger, Scott
Heidkamp, Rebecca
Munos, Melinda Kay
Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania
title Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania
title_full Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania
title_fullStr Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania
title_short Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania
title_sort development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in haiti, malawi and tanzania
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31796487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032558
work_keys_str_mv AT sheffelashley developmentofsummaryindicesofantenatalcareservicequalityinhaitimalawiandtanzania
AT zegerscott developmentofsummaryindicesofantenatalcareservicequalityinhaitimalawiandtanzania
AT heidkamprebecca developmentofsummaryindicesofantenatalcareservicequalityinhaitimalawiandtanzania
AT munosmelindakay developmentofsummaryindicesofantenatalcareservicequalityinhaitimalawiandtanzania