Cargando…

Host density drives viral, but not trypanosome, transmission in a key pollinator

Supplemental feeding of wildlife populations can locally increase the density of individuals, which may in turn impact disease dynamics. Flower strips are a widely used intervention in intensive agricultural systems to nutritionally support pollinators such as bees. Using a controlled experimental s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bailes, Emily J., Bagi, Judit, Coltman, Jake, Fountain, Michelle T., Wilfert, Lena, Brown, Mark J. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1969
_version_ 1783494539574509568
author Bailes, Emily J.
Bagi, Judit
Coltman, Jake
Fountain, Michelle T.
Wilfert, Lena
Brown, Mark J. F.
author_facet Bailes, Emily J.
Bagi, Judit
Coltman, Jake
Fountain, Michelle T.
Wilfert, Lena
Brown, Mark J. F.
author_sort Bailes, Emily J.
collection PubMed
description Supplemental feeding of wildlife populations can locally increase the density of individuals, which may in turn impact disease dynamics. Flower strips are a widely used intervention in intensive agricultural systems to nutritionally support pollinators such as bees. Using a controlled experimental semi-field design, we asked how density impacts transmission of a virus and a trypanosome parasite in bumblebees. We manipulated bumblebee density by using different numbers of colonies within the same area of floral resource. In high-density compartments, slow bee paralysis virus was transmitted more quickly, resulting in higher prevalence and level of infection in bumblebee hosts. By contrast, there was no impact of density on the transmission of the trypanosome Crithidia bombi, which may reflect the ease with which this parasite is transmitted. These results suggest that agri-environment schemes such as flower strips, which are known to enhance the nutrition and survival of bumblebees, may also have negative impacts on pollinators through enhanced disease transmission. Future studies should assess how changing the design of these schemes could minimize disease transmission and thus maximise their health benefits to wild pollinators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7003466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70034662020-02-09 Host density drives viral, but not trypanosome, transmission in a key pollinator Bailes, Emily J. Bagi, Judit Coltman, Jake Fountain, Michelle T. Wilfert, Lena Brown, Mark J. F. Proc Biol Sci Global Change and Conservation Supplemental feeding of wildlife populations can locally increase the density of individuals, which may in turn impact disease dynamics. Flower strips are a widely used intervention in intensive agricultural systems to nutritionally support pollinators such as bees. Using a controlled experimental semi-field design, we asked how density impacts transmission of a virus and a trypanosome parasite in bumblebees. We manipulated bumblebee density by using different numbers of colonies within the same area of floral resource. In high-density compartments, slow bee paralysis virus was transmitted more quickly, resulting in higher prevalence and level of infection in bumblebee hosts. By contrast, there was no impact of density on the transmission of the trypanosome Crithidia bombi, which may reflect the ease with which this parasite is transmitted. These results suggest that agri-environment schemes such as flower strips, which are known to enhance the nutrition and survival of bumblebees, may also have negative impacts on pollinators through enhanced disease transmission. Future studies should assess how changing the design of these schemes could minimize disease transmission and thus maximise their health benefits to wild pollinators. The Royal Society 2020-01-15 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7003466/ /pubmed/31910787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1969 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Global Change and Conservation
Bailes, Emily J.
Bagi, Judit
Coltman, Jake
Fountain, Michelle T.
Wilfert, Lena
Brown, Mark J. F.
Host density drives viral, but not trypanosome, transmission in a key pollinator
title Host density drives viral, but not trypanosome, transmission in a key pollinator
title_full Host density drives viral, but not trypanosome, transmission in a key pollinator
title_fullStr Host density drives viral, but not trypanosome, transmission in a key pollinator
title_full_unstemmed Host density drives viral, but not trypanosome, transmission in a key pollinator
title_short Host density drives viral, but not trypanosome, transmission in a key pollinator
title_sort host density drives viral, but not trypanosome, transmission in a key pollinator
topic Global Change and Conservation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1969
work_keys_str_mv AT bailesemilyj hostdensitydrivesviralbutnottrypanosometransmissioninakeypollinator
AT bagijudit hostdensitydrivesviralbutnottrypanosometransmissioninakeypollinator
AT coltmanjake hostdensitydrivesviralbutnottrypanosometransmissioninakeypollinator
AT fountainmichellet hostdensitydrivesviralbutnottrypanosometransmissioninakeypollinator
AT wilfertlena hostdensitydrivesviralbutnottrypanosometransmissioninakeypollinator
AT brownmarkjf hostdensitydrivesviralbutnottrypanosometransmissioninakeypollinator