Cargando…
Host density drives viral, but not trypanosome, transmission in a key pollinator
Supplemental feeding of wildlife populations can locally increase the density of individuals, which may in turn impact disease dynamics. Flower strips are a widely used intervention in intensive agricultural systems to nutritionally support pollinators such as bees. Using a controlled experimental s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1969 |
_version_ | 1783494539574509568 |
---|---|
author | Bailes, Emily J. Bagi, Judit Coltman, Jake Fountain, Michelle T. Wilfert, Lena Brown, Mark J. F. |
author_facet | Bailes, Emily J. Bagi, Judit Coltman, Jake Fountain, Michelle T. Wilfert, Lena Brown, Mark J. F. |
author_sort | Bailes, Emily J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Supplemental feeding of wildlife populations can locally increase the density of individuals, which may in turn impact disease dynamics. Flower strips are a widely used intervention in intensive agricultural systems to nutritionally support pollinators such as bees. Using a controlled experimental semi-field design, we asked how density impacts transmission of a virus and a trypanosome parasite in bumblebees. We manipulated bumblebee density by using different numbers of colonies within the same area of floral resource. In high-density compartments, slow bee paralysis virus was transmitted more quickly, resulting in higher prevalence and level of infection in bumblebee hosts. By contrast, there was no impact of density on the transmission of the trypanosome Crithidia bombi, which may reflect the ease with which this parasite is transmitted. These results suggest that agri-environment schemes such as flower strips, which are known to enhance the nutrition and survival of bumblebees, may also have negative impacts on pollinators through enhanced disease transmission. Future studies should assess how changing the design of these schemes could minimize disease transmission and thus maximise their health benefits to wild pollinators. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7003466 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70034662020-02-09 Host density drives viral, but not trypanosome, transmission in a key pollinator Bailes, Emily J. Bagi, Judit Coltman, Jake Fountain, Michelle T. Wilfert, Lena Brown, Mark J. F. Proc Biol Sci Global Change and Conservation Supplemental feeding of wildlife populations can locally increase the density of individuals, which may in turn impact disease dynamics. Flower strips are a widely used intervention in intensive agricultural systems to nutritionally support pollinators such as bees. Using a controlled experimental semi-field design, we asked how density impacts transmission of a virus and a trypanosome parasite in bumblebees. We manipulated bumblebee density by using different numbers of colonies within the same area of floral resource. In high-density compartments, slow bee paralysis virus was transmitted more quickly, resulting in higher prevalence and level of infection in bumblebee hosts. By contrast, there was no impact of density on the transmission of the trypanosome Crithidia bombi, which may reflect the ease with which this parasite is transmitted. These results suggest that agri-environment schemes such as flower strips, which are known to enhance the nutrition and survival of bumblebees, may also have negative impacts on pollinators through enhanced disease transmission. Future studies should assess how changing the design of these schemes could minimize disease transmission and thus maximise their health benefits to wild pollinators. The Royal Society 2020-01-15 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7003466/ /pubmed/31910787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1969 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Global Change and Conservation Bailes, Emily J. Bagi, Judit Coltman, Jake Fountain, Michelle T. Wilfert, Lena Brown, Mark J. F. Host density drives viral, but not trypanosome, transmission in a key pollinator |
title | Host density drives viral, but not trypanosome, transmission in a key pollinator |
title_full | Host density drives viral, but not trypanosome, transmission in a key pollinator |
title_fullStr | Host density drives viral, but not trypanosome, transmission in a key pollinator |
title_full_unstemmed | Host density drives viral, but not trypanosome, transmission in a key pollinator |
title_short | Host density drives viral, but not trypanosome, transmission in a key pollinator |
title_sort | host density drives viral, but not trypanosome, transmission in a key pollinator |
topic | Global Change and Conservation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1969 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bailesemilyj hostdensitydrivesviralbutnottrypanosometransmissioninakeypollinator AT bagijudit hostdensitydrivesviralbutnottrypanosometransmissioninakeypollinator AT coltmanjake hostdensitydrivesviralbutnottrypanosometransmissioninakeypollinator AT fountainmichellet hostdensitydrivesviralbutnottrypanosometransmissioninakeypollinator AT wilfertlena hostdensitydrivesviralbutnottrypanosometransmissioninakeypollinator AT brownmarkjf hostdensitydrivesviralbutnottrypanosometransmissioninakeypollinator |