Cargando…

Mapping the preclinical to clinical evidence and development trajectory of the oncolytic virus talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC): a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence to chart the successful trajectory of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) from the bench to the clinic. DESIGN: This study was a systematic review. The primary outcome of interest was the efficacy of treatme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lalu, Manoj, Leung, Garvin J, Dong, Yuan Yi, Montroy, Joshua, Butler, Claire, Auer, Rebecca C, Fergusson, Dean A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31796474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029475
_version_ 1783494543301148672
author Lalu, Manoj
Leung, Garvin J
Dong, Yuan Yi
Montroy, Joshua
Butler, Claire
Auer, Rebecca C
Fergusson, Dean A
author_facet Lalu, Manoj
Leung, Garvin J
Dong, Yuan Yi
Montroy, Joshua
Butler, Claire
Auer, Rebecca C
Fergusson, Dean A
author_sort Lalu, Manoj
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence to chart the successful trajectory of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) from the bench to the clinic. DESIGN: This study was a systematic review. The primary outcome of interest was the efficacy of treatment, determined by complete response. Abstract and full-text selection as well as data extraction were done by two independent reviewers. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias in studies. SETTING: Embase, Embase Classic and OvidMedline were searched from inception until May 2016 to assess its development trajectory to approval in 2015. PARTICIPANTS: Preclinical and clinical controlled comparison studies, as well as observational studies. INTERVENTIONS: T-VEC for the treatment of any malignancy. RESULTS: 8852 records were screened and five preclinical (n=150 animals) and seven clinical studies (n=589 patients) were included. We saw large decreases in T-VEC’s efficacy as studies moved from the laboratory to patients, and as studies became more methodologically rigorous. Preclinical studies reported complete regression rates up to 100% for injected tumours and 80% for contralateral tumours, while the highest degree of efficacy seen in the clinical setting was a 24% complete response rate, with one study experiencing a complete response rate of 0%. We were unable to reliably assess safety due to the lack of reporting, as well as the heterogeneity seen in adverse event definitions. All preclinical studies had high or unclear risk of bias, and all clinical studies were at a high risk of bias in at least one domain. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings illustrate that even successful biotherapeutics may not demonstrate a clear translational road map. This emphasises the need to consider increasing rigour and transparency along the translational pathway. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016043541.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7003485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70034852020-02-25 Mapping the preclinical to clinical evidence and development trajectory of the oncolytic virus talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC): a systematic review Lalu, Manoj Leung, Garvin J Dong, Yuan Yi Montroy, Joshua Butler, Claire Auer, Rebecca C Fergusson, Dean A BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence to chart the successful trajectory of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) from the bench to the clinic. DESIGN: This study was a systematic review. The primary outcome of interest was the efficacy of treatment, determined by complete response. Abstract and full-text selection as well as data extraction were done by two independent reviewers. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias in studies. SETTING: Embase, Embase Classic and OvidMedline were searched from inception until May 2016 to assess its development trajectory to approval in 2015. PARTICIPANTS: Preclinical and clinical controlled comparison studies, as well as observational studies. INTERVENTIONS: T-VEC for the treatment of any malignancy. RESULTS: 8852 records were screened and five preclinical (n=150 animals) and seven clinical studies (n=589 patients) were included. We saw large decreases in T-VEC’s efficacy as studies moved from the laboratory to patients, and as studies became more methodologically rigorous. Preclinical studies reported complete regression rates up to 100% for injected tumours and 80% for contralateral tumours, while the highest degree of efficacy seen in the clinical setting was a 24% complete response rate, with one study experiencing a complete response rate of 0%. We were unable to reliably assess safety due to the lack of reporting, as well as the heterogeneity seen in adverse event definitions. All preclinical studies had high or unclear risk of bias, and all clinical studies were at a high risk of bias in at least one domain. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings illustrate that even successful biotherapeutics may not demonstrate a clear translational road map. This emphasises the need to consider increasing rigour and transparency along the translational pathway. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016043541. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7003485/ /pubmed/31796474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029475 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Lalu, Manoj
Leung, Garvin J
Dong, Yuan Yi
Montroy, Joshua
Butler, Claire
Auer, Rebecca C
Fergusson, Dean A
Mapping the preclinical to clinical evidence and development trajectory of the oncolytic virus talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC): a systematic review
title Mapping the preclinical to clinical evidence and development trajectory of the oncolytic virus talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC): a systematic review
title_full Mapping the preclinical to clinical evidence and development trajectory of the oncolytic virus talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC): a systematic review
title_fullStr Mapping the preclinical to clinical evidence and development trajectory of the oncolytic virus talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC): a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Mapping the preclinical to clinical evidence and development trajectory of the oncolytic virus talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC): a systematic review
title_short Mapping the preclinical to clinical evidence and development trajectory of the oncolytic virus talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC): a systematic review
title_sort mapping the preclinical to clinical evidence and development trajectory of the oncolytic virus talimogene laherparepvec (t-vec): a systematic review
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31796474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029475
work_keys_str_mv AT lalumanoj mappingthepreclinicaltoclinicalevidenceanddevelopmenttrajectoryoftheoncolyticvirustalimogenelaherparepvectvecasystematicreview
AT leunggarvinj mappingthepreclinicaltoclinicalevidenceanddevelopmenttrajectoryoftheoncolyticvirustalimogenelaherparepvectvecasystematicreview
AT dongyuanyi mappingthepreclinicaltoclinicalevidenceanddevelopmenttrajectoryoftheoncolyticvirustalimogenelaherparepvectvecasystematicreview
AT montroyjoshua mappingthepreclinicaltoclinicalevidenceanddevelopmenttrajectoryoftheoncolyticvirustalimogenelaherparepvectvecasystematicreview
AT butlerclaire mappingthepreclinicaltoclinicalevidenceanddevelopmenttrajectoryoftheoncolyticvirustalimogenelaherparepvectvecasystematicreview
AT auerrebeccac mappingthepreclinicaltoclinicalevidenceanddevelopmenttrajectoryoftheoncolyticvirustalimogenelaherparepvectvecasystematicreview
AT fergussondeana mappingthepreclinicaltoclinicalevidenceanddevelopmenttrajectoryoftheoncolyticvirustalimogenelaherparepvectvecasystematicreview