Cargando…

Why HALO 301 Failed and Implications for Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer

Survival rates for pancreatic cancer (PC) remain dismal. Current standard of care treatment regimens provide transient clinical benefit but eventually chemoresistance develops leading to poor outcomes. PC is a relatively chemoresistant tumor and one of the explanations for this is attributed to desm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hakim, Nausheen, Patel, Rajvi, Devoe, Craig, Saif, Muhammad W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32030361
http://dx.doi.org/10.17140/POJ-3-e010
_version_ 1783494566428540928
author Hakim, Nausheen
Patel, Rajvi
Devoe, Craig
Saif, Muhammad W.
author_facet Hakim, Nausheen
Patel, Rajvi
Devoe, Craig
Saif, Muhammad W.
author_sort Hakim, Nausheen
collection PubMed
description Survival rates for pancreatic cancer (PC) remain dismal. Current standard of care treatment regimens provide transient clinical benefit but eventually chemoresistance develops leading to poor outcomes. PC is a relatively chemoresistant tumor and one of the explanations for this is attributed to desmoplasia that impedes drug delivery. Based on this, stromal modifying agent such as Pegvorhyaluronidase alfa (PEGPH20) was developed and investigated in phase I-III studies. Although phase I-II studies showed promising results in patients with high hyaluronic acid (HA) expressing tumors, the phase III HALO 301 study failed to miss it’s primary endpoint and further development of PEHPH20 is halted. This failure implies that targeting desmoplasia alone is not sufficient and other intrinsic factors such as lack of significant neoantigens, low tumor mutational burden, and epithelial to mesenchymal transition may be at play. It is also important to consider that although the tumor stroma may be a physical barrier hampering drug delivery, it may also have protective effects in restraining tumor growth and progression. Further studies in molecular biology to better characterize the complex interaction between the microenvironment and cancer cells are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7003617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70036172020-02-06 Why HALO 301 Failed and Implications for Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer Hakim, Nausheen Patel, Rajvi Devoe, Craig Saif, Muhammad W. Pancreas (Fairfax) Article Survival rates for pancreatic cancer (PC) remain dismal. Current standard of care treatment regimens provide transient clinical benefit but eventually chemoresistance develops leading to poor outcomes. PC is a relatively chemoresistant tumor and one of the explanations for this is attributed to desmoplasia that impedes drug delivery. Based on this, stromal modifying agent such as Pegvorhyaluronidase alfa (PEGPH20) was developed and investigated in phase I-III studies. Although phase I-II studies showed promising results in patients with high hyaluronic acid (HA) expressing tumors, the phase III HALO 301 study failed to miss it’s primary endpoint and further development of PEHPH20 is halted. This failure implies that targeting desmoplasia alone is not sufficient and other intrinsic factors such as lack of significant neoantigens, low tumor mutational burden, and epithelial to mesenchymal transition may be at play. It is also important to consider that although the tumor stroma may be a physical barrier hampering drug delivery, it may also have protective effects in restraining tumor growth and progression. Further studies in molecular biology to better characterize the complex interaction between the microenvironment and cancer cells are warranted. 2019-12-20 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC7003617/ /pubmed/32030361 http://dx.doi.org/10.17140/POJ-3-e010 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows to copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and reproduce in any medium or format, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Hakim, Nausheen
Patel, Rajvi
Devoe, Craig
Saif, Muhammad W.
Why HALO 301 Failed and Implications for Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer
title Why HALO 301 Failed and Implications for Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer
title_full Why HALO 301 Failed and Implications for Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer
title_fullStr Why HALO 301 Failed and Implications for Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Why HALO 301 Failed and Implications for Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer
title_short Why HALO 301 Failed and Implications for Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer
title_sort why halo 301 failed and implications for treatment of pancreatic cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32030361
http://dx.doi.org/10.17140/POJ-3-e010
work_keys_str_mv AT hakimnausheen whyhalo301failedandimplicationsfortreatmentofpancreaticcancer
AT patelrajvi whyhalo301failedandimplicationsfortreatmentofpancreaticcancer
AT devoecraig whyhalo301failedandimplicationsfortreatmentofpancreaticcancer
AT saifmuhammadw whyhalo301failedandimplicationsfortreatmentofpancreaticcancer