Cargando…
Imaging Functional Recovery Following Ischemic Stroke: Clinical and Preclinical fMRI Studies
Disability and effectiveness of physical therapy are highly variable following ischemic stroke due to different brain regions being affected. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of patients in the months and years following stroke have given some insight into how the brain recovers...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31608550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jon.12668 |
_version_ | 1783494582839803904 |
---|---|
author | Crofts, Andrew Kelly, Michael E. Gibson, Claire L. |
author_facet | Crofts, Andrew Kelly, Michael E. Gibson, Claire L. |
author_sort | Crofts, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Disability and effectiveness of physical therapy are highly variable following ischemic stroke due to different brain regions being affected. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of patients in the months and years following stroke have given some insight into how the brain recovers lost functions. Initially, new pathways are recruited to compensate for the lost region, showing as a brighter blood oxygen‐level‐dependent (BOLD) signal over a larger area during a task than in healthy controls. Subsequently, activity is reduced to baseline levels as pathways become more efficient, mimicking the process of learning typically seen during development. Preclinical models of ischemic stroke aim to enhance understanding of the biology underlying recovery following stroke. However, the pattern of recruitment and focusing seen in humans has not been observed in preclinical fMRI studies that are highly variable methodologically. Resting‐state fMRI studies show more consistency; however, there are still confounding factors to address. Anesthesia and method of stroke induction are the two main sources of variability in preclinical studies; improvements here can reduce variability and increase the intensity and reproducibility of the BOLD response detected by fMRI. Differences in task or stimulus and differences in analysis method also present a source of variability. This review compares clinical and preclinical fMRI studies of recovery following stroke and focuses on how refinement of preclinical models and MRI methods may obtain more representative fMRI data in relation to human studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7003729 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70037292020-02-10 Imaging Functional Recovery Following Ischemic Stroke: Clinical and Preclinical fMRI Studies Crofts, Andrew Kelly, Michael E. Gibson, Claire L. J Neuroimaging Review Articles Disability and effectiveness of physical therapy are highly variable following ischemic stroke due to different brain regions being affected. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of patients in the months and years following stroke have given some insight into how the brain recovers lost functions. Initially, new pathways are recruited to compensate for the lost region, showing as a brighter blood oxygen‐level‐dependent (BOLD) signal over a larger area during a task than in healthy controls. Subsequently, activity is reduced to baseline levels as pathways become more efficient, mimicking the process of learning typically seen during development. Preclinical models of ischemic stroke aim to enhance understanding of the biology underlying recovery following stroke. However, the pattern of recruitment and focusing seen in humans has not been observed in preclinical fMRI studies that are highly variable methodologically. Resting‐state fMRI studies show more consistency; however, there are still confounding factors to address. Anesthesia and method of stroke induction are the two main sources of variability in preclinical studies; improvements here can reduce variability and increase the intensity and reproducibility of the BOLD response detected by fMRI. Differences in task or stimulus and differences in analysis method also present a source of variability. This review compares clinical and preclinical fMRI studies of recovery following stroke and focuses on how refinement of preclinical models and MRI methods may obtain more representative fMRI data in relation to human studies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-13 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7003729/ /pubmed/31608550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jon.12668 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Neuroimaging published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society of Neuroimaging This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Crofts, Andrew Kelly, Michael E. Gibson, Claire L. Imaging Functional Recovery Following Ischemic Stroke: Clinical and Preclinical fMRI Studies |
title | Imaging Functional Recovery Following Ischemic Stroke: Clinical and Preclinical fMRI Studies |
title_full | Imaging Functional Recovery Following Ischemic Stroke: Clinical and Preclinical fMRI Studies |
title_fullStr | Imaging Functional Recovery Following Ischemic Stroke: Clinical and Preclinical fMRI Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Imaging Functional Recovery Following Ischemic Stroke: Clinical and Preclinical fMRI Studies |
title_short | Imaging Functional Recovery Following Ischemic Stroke: Clinical and Preclinical fMRI Studies |
title_sort | imaging functional recovery following ischemic stroke: clinical and preclinical fmri studies |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31608550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jon.12668 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT croftsandrew imagingfunctionalrecoveryfollowingischemicstrokeclinicalandpreclinicalfmristudies AT kellymichaele imagingfunctionalrecoveryfollowingischemicstrokeclinicalandpreclinicalfmristudies AT gibsonclairel imagingfunctionalrecoveryfollowingischemicstrokeclinicalandpreclinicalfmristudies |