Cargando…
The Societal Value of Broader Access to Antiobesity Medications
OBJECTIVE: Obesity and its complications place an enormous burden on society. Yet antiobesity medications (AOM) are prescribed to only 2% of the eligible population, even though few individuals can sustain weight loss using other strategies alone. This study estimated the societal value of greater a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31869002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.22696 |
_version_ | 1783494583766745088 |
---|---|
author | Kabiri, Mina Sexton Ward, Alison Ramasamy, Abhilasha van Eijndhoven, Emma Ganguly, Rahul Smolarz, B. Gabriel Zvenyach, Tracy Goldman, Dana P. Baumgardner, James R. |
author_facet | Kabiri, Mina Sexton Ward, Alison Ramasamy, Abhilasha van Eijndhoven, Emma Ganguly, Rahul Smolarz, B. Gabriel Zvenyach, Tracy Goldman, Dana P. Baumgardner, James R. |
author_sort | Kabiri, Mina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Obesity and its complications place an enormous burden on society. Yet antiobesity medications (AOM) are prescribed to only 2% of the eligible population, even though few individuals can sustain weight loss using other strategies alone. This study estimated the societal value of greater access to AOM. METHODS: By using a well‐established simulation model (The Health Economics Medical Innovation Simulation), the societal value of AOM for the cohort of Americans aged ≥ 25 years in 2019 was quantified. Four scenarios with differential uptake among the eligible population (15% and 30%) were modeled, with efficacy from current and next‐generation AOM. Societal value was measured as monetized quality of life, productivity gains, and savings in medical spending, subtracting the costs of AOM. RESULTS: For the 217 million Americans aged ≥ 25 years, AOM generated $1.2 trillion in lifetime societal value under a conservative scenario (15% annual uptake using currently available AOM). The introduction of next‐generation AOM increased societal value to $1.9 to $2.5 trillion, depending on uptake. Finally, societal value was higher for younger individuals and Black and Hispanic individuals compared with White individuals. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that AOM provide substantial gains to patients and society. Policies promoting broader clinical access to and use of AOM warrant consideration to reach national goals to reduce obesity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7003734 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70037342020-02-10 The Societal Value of Broader Access to Antiobesity Medications Kabiri, Mina Sexton Ward, Alison Ramasamy, Abhilasha van Eijndhoven, Emma Ganguly, Rahul Smolarz, B. Gabriel Zvenyach, Tracy Goldman, Dana P. Baumgardner, James R. Obesity (Silver Spring) Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Obesity and its complications place an enormous burden on society. Yet antiobesity medications (AOM) are prescribed to only 2% of the eligible population, even though few individuals can sustain weight loss using other strategies alone. This study estimated the societal value of greater access to AOM. METHODS: By using a well‐established simulation model (The Health Economics Medical Innovation Simulation), the societal value of AOM for the cohort of Americans aged ≥ 25 years in 2019 was quantified. Four scenarios with differential uptake among the eligible population (15% and 30%) were modeled, with efficacy from current and next‐generation AOM. Societal value was measured as monetized quality of life, productivity gains, and savings in medical spending, subtracting the costs of AOM. RESULTS: For the 217 million Americans aged ≥ 25 years, AOM generated $1.2 trillion in lifetime societal value under a conservative scenario (15% annual uptake using currently available AOM). The introduction of next‐generation AOM increased societal value to $1.9 to $2.5 trillion, depending on uptake. Finally, societal value was higher for younger individuals and Black and Hispanic individuals compared with White individuals. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that AOM provide substantial gains to patients and society. Policies promoting broader clinical access to and use of AOM warrant consideration to reach national goals to reduce obesity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-23 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7003734/ /pubmed/31869002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.22696 Text en © 2019 Novo Nordisk Inc. Obesity published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Obesity Society (TOS) This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kabiri, Mina Sexton Ward, Alison Ramasamy, Abhilasha van Eijndhoven, Emma Ganguly, Rahul Smolarz, B. Gabriel Zvenyach, Tracy Goldman, Dana P. Baumgardner, James R. The Societal Value of Broader Access to Antiobesity Medications |
title | The Societal Value of Broader Access to Antiobesity Medications |
title_full | The Societal Value of Broader Access to Antiobesity Medications |
title_fullStr | The Societal Value of Broader Access to Antiobesity Medications |
title_full_unstemmed | The Societal Value of Broader Access to Antiobesity Medications |
title_short | The Societal Value of Broader Access to Antiobesity Medications |
title_sort | societal value of broader access to antiobesity medications |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31869002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.22696 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kabirimina thesocietalvalueofbroaderaccesstoantiobesitymedications AT sextonwardalison thesocietalvalueofbroaderaccesstoantiobesitymedications AT ramasamyabhilasha thesocietalvalueofbroaderaccesstoantiobesitymedications AT vaneijndhovenemma thesocietalvalueofbroaderaccesstoantiobesitymedications AT gangulyrahul thesocietalvalueofbroaderaccesstoantiobesitymedications AT smolarzbgabriel thesocietalvalueofbroaderaccesstoantiobesitymedications AT zvenyachtracy thesocietalvalueofbroaderaccesstoantiobesitymedications AT goldmandanap thesocietalvalueofbroaderaccesstoantiobesitymedications AT baumgardnerjamesr thesocietalvalueofbroaderaccesstoantiobesitymedications AT kabirimina societalvalueofbroaderaccesstoantiobesitymedications AT sextonwardalison societalvalueofbroaderaccesstoantiobesitymedications AT ramasamyabhilasha societalvalueofbroaderaccesstoantiobesitymedications AT vaneijndhovenemma societalvalueofbroaderaccesstoantiobesitymedications AT gangulyrahul societalvalueofbroaderaccesstoantiobesitymedications AT smolarzbgabriel societalvalueofbroaderaccesstoantiobesitymedications AT zvenyachtracy societalvalueofbroaderaccesstoantiobesitymedications AT goldmandanap societalvalueofbroaderaccesstoantiobesitymedications AT baumgardnerjamesr societalvalueofbroaderaccesstoantiobesitymedications |