Cargando…

Recurrence of idiopathic acute pancreatitis after cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Occult biliary disease has been suggested as a frequent underlying cause of idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP). Cholecystectomy has been proposed as a strategy to prevent recurrent IAP. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy of cholecystectomy in reducing the ri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Umans, D. S., Hallensleben, N. D., Verdonk, R. C., Bouwense, S. A. W., Fockens, P., van Santvoort, H. C., Voermans, R. P., Besselink, M. G., Bruno, M. J., van Hooft, J. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31875953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11429
_version_ 1783494589157474304
author Umans, D. S.
Hallensleben, N. D.
Verdonk, R. C.
Bouwense, S. A. W.
Fockens, P.
van Santvoort, H. C.
Voermans, R. P.
Besselink, M. G.
Bruno, M. J.
van Hooft, J. E.
author_facet Umans, D. S.
Hallensleben, N. D.
Verdonk, R. C.
Bouwense, S. A. W.
Fockens, P.
van Santvoort, H. C.
Voermans, R. P.
Besselink, M. G.
Bruno, M. J.
van Hooft, J. E.
author_sort Umans, D. S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Occult biliary disease has been suggested as a frequent underlying cause of idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP). Cholecystectomy has been proposed as a strategy to prevent recurrent IAP. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy of cholecystectomy in reducing the risk of recurrent IAP. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically for studies including patients with IAP treated by cholecystectomy, with data on recurrence of pancreatitis. Studies published before 1980 or including chronic pancreatitis and case reports were excluded. The primary outcome was recurrence rate. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Meta‐analyses were undertaken to calculate risk ratios using a random‐effects model with the inverse‐variance method. RESULTS: Overall, ten studies were included, of which nine were used in pooled analyses. The study population consisted of 524 patients with 126 cholecystectomies. Of these 524 patients, 154 (29·4 (95 per cent c.i. 25·5 to 33·3) per cent) had recurrent disease. The recurrence rate was significantly lower after cholecystectomy than after conservative management (14 of 126 (11·1 per cent) versus 140 of 398 (35·2 per cent); risk ratio 0·44, 95 per cent c.i. 0·27 to 0·71). Even in patients in whom IAP was diagnosed after more extensive diagnostic testing, including endoscopic ultrasonography or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, the recurrence rate appeared to be lower after cholecystectomy (4 of 36 (11 per cent) versus 42 of 108 (38·9 per cent); risk ratio 0·41, 0·16 to 1·07). CONCLUSION: Cholecystectomy after an episode of IAP reduces the risk of recurrent pancreatitis. This implies that current diagnostics are insufficient to exclude a biliary cause.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7003758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70037582020-02-10 Recurrence of idiopathic acute pancreatitis after cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta‐analysis Umans, D. S. Hallensleben, N. D. Verdonk, R. C. Bouwense, S. A. W. Fockens, P. van Santvoort, H. C. Voermans, R. P. Besselink, M. G. Bruno, M. J. van Hooft, J. E. Br J Surg Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Occult biliary disease has been suggested as a frequent underlying cause of idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP). Cholecystectomy has been proposed as a strategy to prevent recurrent IAP. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy of cholecystectomy in reducing the risk of recurrent IAP. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically for studies including patients with IAP treated by cholecystectomy, with data on recurrence of pancreatitis. Studies published before 1980 or including chronic pancreatitis and case reports were excluded. The primary outcome was recurrence rate. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Meta‐analyses were undertaken to calculate risk ratios using a random‐effects model with the inverse‐variance method. RESULTS: Overall, ten studies were included, of which nine were used in pooled analyses. The study population consisted of 524 patients with 126 cholecystectomies. Of these 524 patients, 154 (29·4 (95 per cent c.i. 25·5 to 33·3) per cent) had recurrent disease. The recurrence rate was significantly lower after cholecystectomy than after conservative management (14 of 126 (11·1 per cent) versus 140 of 398 (35·2 per cent); risk ratio 0·44, 95 per cent c.i. 0·27 to 0·71). Even in patients in whom IAP was diagnosed after more extensive diagnostic testing, including endoscopic ultrasonography or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, the recurrence rate appeared to be lower after cholecystectomy (4 of 36 (11 per cent) versus 42 of 108 (38·9 per cent); risk ratio 0·41, 0·16 to 1·07). CONCLUSION: Cholecystectomy after an episode of IAP reduces the risk of recurrent pancreatitis. This implies that current diagnostics are insufficient to exclude a biliary cause. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2019-12-25 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7003758/ /pubmed/31875953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11429 Text en © 2019 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Umans, D. S.
Hallensleben, N. D.
Verdonk, R. C.
Bouwense, S. A. W.
Fockens, P.
van Santvoort, H. C.
Voermans, R. P.
Besselink, M. G.
Bruno, M. J.
van Hooft, J. E.
Recurrence of idiopathic acute pancreatitis after cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Recurrence of idiopathic acute pancreatitis after cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Recurrence of idiopathic acute pancreatitis after cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Recurrence of idiopathic acute pancreatitis after cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Recurrence of idiopathic acute pancreatitis after cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Recurrence of idiopathic acute pancreatitis after cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort recurrence of idiopathic acute pancreatitis after cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31875953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11429
work_keys_str_mv AT umansds recurrenceofidiopathicacutepancreatitisaftercholecystectomysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hallenslebennd recurrenceofidiopathicacutepancreatitisaftercholecystectomysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT verdonkrc recurrenceofidiopathicacutepancreatitisaftercholecystectomysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bouwensesaw recurrenceofidiopathicacutepancreatitisaftercholecystectomysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fockensp recurrenceofidiopathicacutepancreatitisaftercholecystectomysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vansantvoorthc recurrenceofidiopathicacutepancreatitisaftercholecystectomysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT voermansrp recurrenceofidiopathicacutepancreatitisaftercholecystectomysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT besselinkmg recurrenceofidiopathicacutepancreatitisaftercholecystectomysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT brunomj recurrenceofidiopathicacutepancreatitisaftercholecystectomysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vanhooftje recurrenceofidiopathicacutepancreatitisaftercholecystectomysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT recurrenceofidiopathicacutepancreatitisaftercholecystectomysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis