Cargando…
Blinatumomab compared with standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome–positive B‐precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia
BACKGROUND: A single‐arm, phase 2 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab, a bispecific T‐cell–engaging antibody construct, in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a rare hematologic malignancy with limi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31626339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32558 |
_version_ | 1783494589619896320 |
---|---|
author | Rambaldi, Alessandro Ribera, Josep‐Maria Kantarjian, Hagop M. Dombret, Hervé Ottmann, Oliver G. Stein, Anthony S. Tuglus, Catherine A. Zhao, Xiaoyue Kim, Christopher Martinelli, Giovanni |
author_facet | Rambaldi, Alessandro Ribera, Josep‐Maria Kantarjian, Hagop M. Dombret, Hervé Ottmann, Oliver G. Stein, Anthony S. Tuglus, Catherine A. Zhao, Xiaoyue Kim, Christopher Martinelli, Giovanni |
author_sort | Rambaldi, Alessandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A single‐arm, phase 2 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab, a bispecific T‐cell–engaging antibody construct, in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a rare hematologic malignancy with limited treatment options. This study compared outcomes with blinatumomab with those of a historical control treated with the standard of care (SOC). METHODS: The blinatumomab trial enrolled adult patients with Ph+ ALL who were r/r to at least 1 second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (n = 45). Propensity score analysis (PSA) was used to compare outcomes with blinatumomab with those of an external cohort of similar patients receiving SOC chemotherapy (n = 55). The PSA mitigated confounding variables between studies by adjusting for imbalances in the age at diagnosis and start of treatment, sex, duration from diagnosis to most recent treatment, prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, prior salvage therapy, and number of salvage therapies. Bayesian data augmentation was applied to improve power to 80% with data from a phase 3 blinatumomab study in r/r Philadelphia chromosome–negative ALL. RESULTS: In the PSA, the rate of complete remission or complete remission with partial hematologic recovery was 36% for blinatumomab and 25% for SOC, and this resulted in an odds ratio of 1.54 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61‐3.89) or 1.70 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.94‐2.94) with Bayesian data augmentation. Overall survival favored blinatumomab over SOC, with a hazard ratio of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.57‐1.14) or 0.77 (95% CrI, 0.61‐0.96) with Bayesian data augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: These results further support blinatumomab as a treatment option for patients with r/r Ph+ ALL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7003760 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70037602020-02-10 Blinatumomab compared with standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome–positive B‐precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia Rambaldi, Alessandro Ribera, Josep‐Maria Kantarjian, Hagop M. Dombret, Hervé Ottmann, Oliver G. Stein, Anthony S. Tuglus, Catherine A. Zhao, Xiaoyue Kim, Christopher Martinelli, Giovanni Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: A single‐arm, phase 2 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab, a bispecific T‐cell–engaging antibody construct, in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a rare hematologic malignancy with limited treatment options. This study compared outcomes with blinatumomab with those of a historical control treated with the standard of care (SOC). METHODS: The blinatumomab trial enrolled adult patients with Ph+ ALL who were r/r to at least 1 second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (n = 45). Propensity score analysis (PSA) was used to compare outcomes with blinatumomab with those of an external cohort of similar patients receiving SOC chemotherapy (n = 55). The PSA mitigated confounding variables between studies by adjusting for imbalances in the age at diagnosis and start of treatment, sex, duration from diagnosis to most recent treatment, prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, prior salvage therapy, and number of salvage therapies. Bayesian data augmentation was applied to improve power to 80% with data from a phase 3 blinatumomab study in r/r Philadelphia chromosome–negative ALL. RESULTS: In the PSA, the rate of complete remission or complete remission with partial hematologic recovery was 36% for blinatumomab and 25% for SOC, and this resulted in an odds ratio of 1.54 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61‐3.89) or 1.70 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.94‐2.94) with Bayesian data augmentation. Overall survival favored blinatumomab over SOC, with a hazard ratio of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.57‐1.14) or 0.77 (95% CrI, 0.61‐0.96) with Bayesian data augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: These results further support blinatumomab as a treatment option for patients with r/r Ph+ ALL. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-18 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7003760/ /pubmed/31626339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32558 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Rambaldi, Alessandro Ribera, Josep‐Maria Kantarjian, Hagop M. Dombret, Hervé Ottmann, Oliver G. Stein, Anthony S. Tuglus, Catherine A. Zhao, Xiaoyue Kim, Christopher Martinelli, Giovanni Blinatumomab compared with standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome–positive B‐precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia |
title | Blinatumomab compared with standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome–positive B‐precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia |
title_full | Blinatumomab compared with standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome–positive B‐precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia |
title_fullStr | Blinatumomab compared with standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome–positive B‐precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia |
title_full_unstemmed | Blinatumomab compared with standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome–positive B‐precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia |
title_short | Blinatumomab compared with standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome–positive B‐precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia |
title_sort | blinatumomab compared with standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory philadelphia chromosome–positive b‐precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31626339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32558 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rambaldialessandro blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia AT riberajosepmaria blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia AT kantarjianhagopm blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia AT dombretherve blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia AT ottmannoliverg blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia AT steinanthonys blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia AT tugluscatherinea blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia AT zhaoxiaoyue blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia AT kimchristopher blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia AT martinelligiovanni blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia |