Cargando…

Blinatumomab compared with standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome–positive B‐precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND: A single‐arm, phase 2 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab, a bispecific T‐cell–engaging antibody construct, in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a rare hematologic malignancy with limi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rambaldi, Alessandro, Ribera, Josep‐Maria, Kantarjian, Hagop M., Dombret, Hervé, Ottmann, Oliver G., Stein, Anthony S., Tuglus, Catherine A., Zhao, Xiaoyue, Kim, Christopher, Martinelli, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31626339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32558
_version_ 1783494589619896320
author Rambaldi, Alessandro
Ribera, Josep‐Maria
Kantarjian, Hagop M.
Dombret, Hervé
Ottmann, Oliver G.
Stein, Anthony S.
Tuglus, Catherine A.
Zhao, Xiaoyue
Kim, Christopher
Martinelli, Giovanni
author_facet Rambaldi, Alessandro
Ribera, Josep‐Maria
Kantarjian, Hagop M.
Dombret, Hervé
Ottmann, Oliver G.
Stein, Anthony S.
Tuglus, Catherine A.
Zhao, Xiaoyue
Kim, Christopher
Martinelli, Giovanni
author_sort Rambaldi, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A single‐arm, phase 2 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab, a bispecific T‐cell–engaging antibody construct, in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a rare hematologic malignancy with limited treatment options. This study compared outcomes with blinatumomab with those of a historical control treated with the standard of care (SOC). METHODS: The blinatumomab trial enrolled adult patients with Ph+ ALL who were r/r to at least 1 second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (n = 45). Propensity score analysis (PSA) was used to compare outcomes with blinatumomab with those of an external cohort of similar patients receiving SOC chemotherapy (n = 55). The PSA mitigated confounding variables between studies by adjusting for imbalances in the age at diagnosis and start of treatment, sex, duration from diagnosis to most recent treatment, prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, prior salvage therapy, and number of salvage therapies. Bayesian data augmentation was applied to improve power to 80% with data from a phase 3 blinatumomab study in r/r Philadelphia chromosome–negative ALL. RESULTS: In the PSA, the rate of complete remission or complete remission with partial hematologic recovery was 36% for blinatumomab and 25% for SOC, and this resulted in an odds ratio of 1.54 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61‐3.89) or 1.70 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.94‐2.94) with Bayesian data augmentation. Overall survival favored blinatumomab over SOC, with a hazard ratio of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.57‐1.14) or 0.77 (95% CrI, 0.61‐0.96) with Bayesian data augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: These results further support blinatumomab as a treatment option for patients with r/r Ph+ ALL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7003760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70037602020-02-10 Blinatumomab compared with standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome–positive B‐precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia Rambaldi, Alessandro Ribera, Josep‐Maria Kantarjian, Hagop M. Dombret, Hervé Ottmann, Oliver G. Stein, Anthony S. Tuglus, Catherine A. Zhao, Xiaoyue Kim, Christopher Martinelli, Giovanni Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: A single‐arm, phase 2 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab, a bispecific T‐cell–engaging antibody construct, in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a rare hematologic malignancy with limited treatment options. This study compared outcomes with blinatumomab with those of a historical control treated with the standard of care (SOC). METHODS: The blinatumomab trial enrolled adult patients with Ph+ ALL who were r/r to at least 1 second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (n = 45). Propensity score analysis (PSA) was used to compare outcomes with blinatumomab with those of an external cohort of similar patients receiving SOC chemotherapy (n = 55). The PSA mitigated confounding variables between studies by adjusting for imbalances in the age at diagnosis and start of treatment, sex, duration from diagnosis to most recent treatment, prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, prior salvage therapy, and number of salvage therapies. Bayesian data augmentation was applied to improve power to 80% with data from a phase 3 blinatumomab study in r/r Philadelphia chromosome–negative ALL. RESULTS: In the PSA, the rate of complete remission or complete remission with partial hematologic recovery was 36% for blinatumomab and 25% for SOC, and this resulted in an odds ratio of 1.54 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61‐3.89) or 1.70 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.94‐2.94) with Bayesian data augmentation. Overall survival favored blinatumomab over SOC, with a hazard ratio of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.57‐1.14) or 0.77 (95% CrI, 0.61‐0.96) with Bayesian data augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: These results further support blinatumomab as a treatment option for patients with r/r Ph+ ALL. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-18 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7003760/ /pubmed/31626339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32558 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Rambaldi, Alessandro
Ribera, Josep‐Maria
Kantarjian, Hagop M.
Dombret, Hervé
Ottmann, Oliver G.
Stein, Anthony S.
Tuglus, Catherine A.
Zhao, Xiaoyue
Kim, Christopher
Martinelli, Giovanni
Blinatumomab compared with standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome–positive B‐precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia
title Blinatumomab compared with standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome–positive B‐precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia
title_full Blinatumomab compared with standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome–positive B‐precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia
title_fullStr Blinatumomab compared with standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome–positive B‐precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia
title_full_unstemmed Blinatumomab compared with standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome–positive B‐precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia
title_short Blinatumomab compared with standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome–positive B‐precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia
title_sort blinatumomab compared with standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory philadelphia chromosome–positive b‐precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31626339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32558
work_keys_str_mv AT rambaldialessandro blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia
AT riberajosepmaria blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia
AT kantarjianhagopm blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia
AT dombretherve blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia
AT ottmannoliverg blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia
AT steinanthonys blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia
AT tugluscatherinea blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia
AT zhaoxiaoyue blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia
AT kimchristopher blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia
AT martinelligiovanni blinatumomabcomparedwithstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithrelapsedrefractoryphiladelphiachromosomepositivebprecursoracutelymphoblasticleukemia