Cargando…
Clinical utility of hereditary cancer panel testing: Impact of PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D results on patient management and adherence to provider recommendations
BACKGROUND: Although management guidelines exist for several genes associated with a 2‐fold to 5‐fold increase in the relative risk for certain cancers, the value of testing for them remains controversial. METHODS: De‐identified personal and family history data for 654 individuals with pathogenic va...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31682005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32572 |
_version_ | 1783494605548814336 |
---|---|
author | Vysotskaia, Valentina Kaseniit, K. Eerik Bucheit, Leslie Ready, Kaylene Price, Kristin Johansen Taber, Katherine |
author_facet | Vysotskaia, Valentina Kaseniit, K. Eerik Bucheit, Leslie Ready, Kaylene Price, Kristin Johansen Taber, Katherine |
author_sort | Vysotskaia, Valentina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although management guidelines exist for several genes associated with a 2‐fold to 5‐fold increase in the relative risk for certain cancers, the value of testing for them remains controversial. METHODS: De‐identified personal and family history data for 654 individuals with pathogenic variants (PVs) in PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and/or RAD51D were analyzed for pretest and post‐test candidacy for guideline‐recommended management of cancer risk. These individuals were invited to complete a survey about provider recommendations and their adherence. RESULTS: Twenty‐four percent of CHEK2, ATM, PALB2, or NBN PV carriers were appropriate for consideration of annual breast magnetic resonance imaging screening before genetic testing, with the remaining 76% appropriate only after testing. No BRIP1, RAD51C, or RAD51D PV carriers were appropriate for consideration of risk‐reducing salpingo‐oophorectomy before genetic testing; 100% were appropriate only after testing. Seventeen percent of CHEK2 PV carriers were appropriate for earlier and more frequent colonoscopy before genetic testing, with the remaining 83% appropriate only after testing. Provider recommendations for annual breast magnetic resonance imaging, consideration of risk‐reducing salpingo‐oophorectomy, and earlier and more frequent colonoscopy were reported by 42%, 26%, and 66% of breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancer risk PV carriers, respectively, before genetic testing, versus 82%, 79%, and 81%, respectively, after testing. Nearly all respondents had planned or undertaken provider‐recommended management. CONCLUSIONS: Testing for PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D changed management for those carrying PVs. Provider recommendations were aligned with guidelines, and patients adhered to recommendations, both of which are critical for reducing both long‐term cancer morbidity and mortality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7003834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70038342020-02-10 Clinical utility of hereditary cancer panel testing: Impact of PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D results on patient management and adherence to provider recommendations Vysotskaia, Valentina Kaseniit, K. Eerik Bucheit, Leslie Ready, Kaylene Price, Kristin Johansen Taber, Katherine Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: Although management guidelines exist for several genes associated with a 2‐fold to 5‐fold increase in the relative risk for certain cancers, the value of testing for them remains controversial. METHODS: De‐identified personal and family history data for 654 individuals with pathogenic variants (PVs) in PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and/or RAD51D were analyzed for pretest and post‐test candidacy for guideline‐recommended management of cancer risk. These individuals were invited to complete a survey about provider recommendations and their adherence. RESULTS: Twenty‐four percent of CHEK2, ATM, PALB2, or NBN PV carriers were appropriate for consideration of annual breast magnetic resonance imaging screening before genetic testing, with the remaining 76% appropriate only after testing. No BRIP1, RAD51C, or RAD51D PV carriers were appropriate for consideration of risk‐reducing salpingo‐oophorectomy before genetic testing; 100% were appropriate only after testing. Seventeen percent of CHEK2 PV carriers were appropriate for earlier and more frequent colonoscopy before genetic testing, with the remaining 83% appropriate only after testing. Provider recommendations for annual breast magnetic resonance imaging, consideration of risk‐reducing salpingo‐oophorectomy, and earlier and more frequent colonoscopy were reported by 42%, 26%, and 66% of breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancer risk PV carriers, respectively, before genetic testing, versus 82%, 79%, and 81%, respectively, after testing. Nearly all respondents had planned or undertaken provider‐recommended management. CONCLUSIONS: Testing for PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D changed management for those carrying PVs. Provider recommendations were aligned with guidelines, and patients adhered to recommendations, both of which are critical for reducing both long‐term cancer morbidity and mortality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-04 2020-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7003834/ /pubmed/31682005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32572 Text en © 2019 Myriad Genetics, Inc. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Vysotskaia, Valentina Kaseniit, K. Eerik Bucheit, Leslie Ready, Kaylene Price, Kristin Johansen Taber, Katherine Clinical utility of hereditary cancer panel testing: Impact of PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D results on patient management and adherence to provider recommendations |
title | Clinical utility of hereditary cancer panel testing: Impact of PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D results on patient management and adherence to provider recommendations |
title_full | Clinical utility of hereditary cancer panel testing: Impact of PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D results on patient management and adherence to provider recommendations |
title_fullStr | Clinical utility of hereditary cancer panel testing: Impact of PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D results on patient management and adherence to provider recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical utility of hereditary cancer panel testing: Impact of PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D results on patient management and adherence to provider recommendations |
title_short | Clinical utility of hereditary cancer panel testing: Impact of PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D results on patient management and adherence to provider recommendations |
title_sort | clinical utility of hereditary cancer panel testing: impact of palb2, atm, chek2, nbn, brip1, rad51c, and rad51d results on patient management and adherence to provider recommendations |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31682005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vysotskaiavalentina clinicalutilityofhereditarycancerpaneltestingimpactofpalb2atmchek2nbnbrip1rad51candrad51dresultsonpatientmanagementandadherencetoproviderrecommendations AT kaseniitkeerik clinicalutilityofhereditarycancerpaneltestingimpactofpalb2atmchek2nbnbrip1rad51candrad51dresultsonpatientmanagementandadherencetoproviderrecommendations AT bucheitleslie clinicalutilityofhereditarycancerpaneltestingimpactofpalb2atmchek2nbnbrip1rad51candrad51dresultsonpatientmanagementandadherencetoproviderrecommendations AT readykaylene clinicalutilityofhereditarycancerpaneltestingimpactofpalb2atmchek2nbnbrip1rad51candrad51dresultsonpatientmanagementandadherencetoproviderrecommendations AT pricekristin clinicalutilityofhereditarycancerpaneltestingimpactofpalb2atmchek2nbnbrip1rad51candrad51dresultsonpatientmanagementandadherencetoproviderrecommendations AT johansentaberkatherine clinicalutilityofhereditarycancerpaneltestingimpactofpalb2atmchek2nbnbrip1rad51candrad51dresultsonpatientmanagementandadherencetoproviderrecommendations |