Cargando…

Content Validity of HIT‐6 as a Measure of Headache Impact in People With Migraine: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND: The short‐form Headache Impact Test (HIT‐6) is a widely used patient‐reported outcome measure that assesses the negative effects of headaches on normal activity. It was developed using the general headache population and prior to the establishment of the now well‐accepted FDA patient‐rep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Houts, Carrie R., Wirth, R.J., McGinley, James S., Gwaltney, Chad, Kassel, Eric, Snapinn, Steven, Cady, Roger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31811654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/head.13701
_version_ 1783494625548304384
author Houts, Carrie R.
Wirth, R.J.
McGinley, James S.
Gwaltney, Chad
Kassel, Eric
Snapinn, Steven
Cady, Roger
author_facet Houts, Carrie R.
Wirth, R.J.
McGinley, James S.
Gwaltney, Chad
Kassel, Eric
Snapinn, Steven
Cady, Roger
author_sort Houts, Carrie R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The short‐form Headache Impact Test (HIT‐6) is a widely used patient‐reported outcome measure that assesses the negative effects of headaches on normal activity. It was developed using the general headache population and prior to the establishment of the now well‐accepted FDA patient‐reported guidance. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this narrative review was to examine existing qualitative research in patients with migraine and headache, providing insight into the relevance and meaningfulness of HIT‐6 items to the lives of migraine patients. METHODS: Articles were identified through database searches (National Library of Medicine and Google Scholar) and review of reference lists of candidate articles. RESULTS: A total of 3227 articles were identified through database and hand searching. Of these, 12 contained patient‐ or expert‐generated qualitative information regarding headache patients’ experience (8 specific to migraine [episodic and chronic] patients and 4 citing general headache patients). The combined publications described a total of 283 patient interviews. Overarching themes and specific information were identified that provide support of the relevance of content for each HIT‐6 item to migraine patients’ lives. Identified effects of headaches on patients with migraine included limitations in daily activities, needing to lie down during headaches, feeling tired, being irritated by headaches, difficulty concentrating, and the experience of pain. Further, previous research specific to the HIT‐6 indicated that patients understood the instructions, items, and response scales as intended by the instrument authors. CONCLUSIONS: This narrative literature review demonstrates qualitative research support for the relevance of the items of the HIT‐6 in migraine patients, supporting its ongoing use in clinical migraine research and practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7003926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70039262020-02-11 Content Validity of HIT‐6 as a Measure of Headache Impact in People With Migraine: A Narrative Review Houts, Carrie R. Wirth, R.J. McGinley, James S. Gwaltney, Chad Kassel, Eric Snapinn, Steven Cady, Roger Headache Review Articles BACKGROUND: The short‐form Headache Impact Test (HIT‐6) is a widely used patient‐reported outcome measure that assesses the negative effects of headaches on normal activity. It was developed using the general headache population and prior to the establishment of the now well‐accepted FDA patient‐reported guidance. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this narrative review was to examine existing qualitative research in patients with migraine and headache, providing insight into the relevance and meaningfulness of HIT‐6 items to the lives of migraine patients. METHODS: Articles were identified through database searches (National Library of Medicine and Google Scholar) and review of reference lists of candidate articles. RESULTS: A total of 3227 articles were identified through database and hand searching. Of these, 12 contained patient‐ or expert‐generated qualitative information regarding headache patients’ experience (8 specific to migraine [episodic and chronic] patients and 4 citing general headache patients). The combined publications described a total of 283 patient interviews. Overarching themes and specific information were identified that provide support of the relevance of content for each HIT‐6 item to migraine patients’ lives. Identified effects of headaches on patients with migraine included limitations in daily activities, needing to lie down during headaches, feeling tired, being irritated by headaches, difficulty concentrating, and the experience of pain. Further, previous research specific to the HIT‐6 indicated that patients understood the instructions, items, and response scales as intended by the instrument authors. CONCLUSIONS: This narrative literature review demonstrates qualitative research support for the relevance of the items of the HIT‐6 in migraine patients, supporting its ongoing use in clinical migraine research and practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-06 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7003926/ /pubmed/31811654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/head.13701 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Houts, Carrie R.
Wirth, R.J.
McGinley, James S.
Gwaltney, Chad
Kassel, Eric
Snapinn, Steven
Cady, Roger
Content Validity of HIT‐6 as a Measure of Headache Impact in People With Migraine: A Narrative Review
title Content Validity of HIT‐6 as a Measure of Headache Impact in People With Migraine: A Narrative Review
title_full Content Validity of HIT‐6 as a Measure of Headache Impact in People With Migraine: A Narrative Review
title_fullStr Content Validity of HIT‐6 as a Measure of Headache Impact in People With Migraine: A Narrative Review
title_full_unstemmed Content Validity of HIT‐6 as a Measure of Headache Impact in People With Migraine: A Narrative Review
title_short Content Validity of HIT‐6 as a Measure of Headache Impact in People With Migraine: A Narrative Review
title_sort content validity of hit‐6 as a measure of headache impact in people with migraine: a narrative review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31811654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/head.13701
work_keys_str_mv AT houtscarrier contentvalidityofhit6asameasureofheadacheimpactinpeoplewithmigraineanarrativereview
AT wirthrj contentvalidityofhit6asameasureofheadacheimpactinpeoplewithmigraineanarrativereview
AT mcginleyjamess contentvalidityofhit6asameasureofheadacheimpactinpeoplewithmigraineanarrativereview
AT gwaltneychad contentvalidityofhit6asameasureofheadacheimpactinpeoplewithmigraineanarrativereview
AT kasseleric contentvalidityofhit6asameasureofheadacheimpactinpeoplewithmigraineanarrativereview
AT snapinnsteven contentvalidityofhit6asameasureofheadacheimpactinpeoplewithmigraineanarrativereview
AT cadyroger contentvalidityofhit6asameasureofheadacheimpactinpeoplewithmigraineanarrativereview