Cargando…

Weak spatiotemporal response of prey to predation risk in a freely interacting system

1. The extent to which prey space use actively minimizes predation risk continues to ignite controversy. Methodological reasons that have hindered consensus include inconsistent measurements of predation risk, biased spatiotemporal scales at which responses are measured and lack of robust null expec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cusack, Jeremy J., Kohl, Michel T., Metz, Matthew C., Coulson, Tim, Stahler, Daniel R., Smith, Douglas W., MacNulty, Daniel R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30838656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12968
_version_ 1783494629874728960
author Cusack, Jeremy J.
Kohl, Michel T.
Metz, Matthew C.
Coulson, Tim
Stahler, Daniel R.
Smith, Douglas W.
MacNulty, Daniel R.
author_facet Cusack, Jeremy J.
Kohl, Michel T.
Metz, Matthew C.
Coulson, Tim
Stahler, Daniel R.
Smith, Douglas W.
MacNulty, Daniel R.
author_sort Cusack, Jeremy J.
collection PubMed
description 1. The extent to which prey space use actively minimizes predation risk continues to ignite controversy. Methodological reasons that have hindered consensus include inconsistent measurements of predation risk, biased spatiotemporal scales at which responses are measured and lack of robust null expectations. 2. We addressed all three challenges in a comprehensive analysis of the spatiotemporal responses of adult female elk (Cervus elaphus) to the risk of predation by wolves (Canis lupus) during winter in northern Yellowstone, USA. 3. We quantified spatial overlap between the winter home ranges of GPS‐collared elk and three measures of predation risk: the intensity of wolf space use, the distribution of wolf‐killed elk and vegetation openness. We also assessed whether elk varied their use of areas characterized by more or less predation risk across hours of the day, and estimated encounter rates between simultaneous elk and wolf pack trajectories. We determined whether observed values were significantly lower than expected if elk movements were random with reference to predation risk using a null model approach. 4. Although a small proportion of elk did show a tendency to minimize use of open vegetation at specific times of the day, overall we highlight a notable absence of spatiotemporal response by female elk to the risk of predation posed by wolves in northern Yellowstone. 5. Our results suggest that predator–prey interactions may not always result in strong spatiotemporal patterns of avoidance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7003944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70039442020-02-11 Weak spatiotemporal response of prey to predation risk in a freely interacting system Cusack, Jeremy J. Kohl, Michel T. Metz, Matthew C. Coulson, Tim Stahler, Daniel R. Smith, Douglas W. MacNulty, Daniel R. J Anim Ecol Foraging Behaviour and Community Ecology 1. The extent to which prey space use actively minimizes predation risk continues to ignite controversy. Methodological reasons that have hindered consensus include inconsistent measurements of predation risk, biased spatiotemporal scales at which responses are measured and lack of robust null expectations. 2. We addressed all three challenges in a comprehensive analysis of the spatiotemporal responses of adult female elk (Cervus elaphus) to the risk of predation by wolves (Canis lupus) during winter in northern Yellowstone, USA. 3. We quantified spatial overlap between the winter home ranges of GPS‐collared elk and three measures of predation risk: the intensity of wolf space use, the distribution of wolf‐killed elk and vegetation openness. We also assessed whether elk varied their use of areas characterized by more or less predation risk across hours of the day, and estimated encounter rates between simultaneous elk and wolf pack trajectories. We determined whether observed values were significantly lower than expected if elk movements were random with reference to predation risk using a null model approach. 4. Although a small proportion of elk did show a tendency to minimize use of open vegetation at specific times of the day, overall we highlight a notable absence of spatiotemporal response by female elk to the risk of predation posed by wolves in northern Yellowstone. 5. Our results suggest that predator–prey interactions may not always result in strong spatiotemporal patterns of avoidance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-21 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7003944/ /pubmed/30838656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12968 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Foraging Behaviour and Community Ecology
Cusack, Jeremy J.
Kohl, Michel T.
Metz, Matthew C.
Coulson, Tim
Stahler, Daniel R.
Smith, Douglas W.
MacNulty, Daniel R.
Weak spatiotemporal response of prey to predation risk in a freely interacting system
title Weak spatiotemporal response of prey to predation risk in a freely interacting system
title_full Weak spatiotemporal response of prey to predation risk in a freely interacting system
title_fullStr Weak spatiotemporal response of prey to predation risk in a freely interacting system
title_full_unstemmed Weak spatiotemporal response of prey to predation risk in a freely interacting system
title_short Weak spatiotemporal response of prey to predation risk in a freely interacting system
title_sort weak spatiotemporal response of prey to predation risk in a freely interacting system
topic Foraging Behaviour and Community Ecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30838656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12968
work_keys_str_mv AT cusackjeremyj weakspatiotemporalresponseofpreytopredationriskinafreelyinteractingsystem
AT kohlmichelt weakspatiotemporalresponseofpreytopredationriskinafreelyinteractingsystem
AT metzmatthewc weakspatiotemporalresponseofpreytopredationriskinafreelyinteractingsystem
AT coulsontim weakspatiotemporalresponseofpreytopredationriskinafreelyinteractingsystem
AT stahlerdanielr weakspatiotemporalresponseofpreytopredationriskinafreelyinteractingsystem
AT smithdouglasw weakspatiotemporalresponseofpreytopredationriskinafreelyinteractingsystem
AT macnultydanielr weakspatiotemporalresponseofpreytopredationriskinafreelyinteractingsystem