Cargando…

Caregivers' experiences with the new family‐centred paediatric physiotherapy programme COPCA: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Caregivers' experiences during early intervention of their infant with special needs have consequences for their participation in the intervention. Hence, it is vital to understand caregivers' view. This study explored caregivers' experiences with the family‐centred early...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akhbari Ziegler, Schirin, Mitteregger, Elena, Hadders‐Algra, Mijna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31800118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cch.12722
_version_ 1783494630121144320
author Akhbari Ziegler, Schirin
Mitteregger, Elena
Hadders‐Algra, Mijna
author_facet Akhbari Ziegler, Schirin
Mitteregger, Elena
Hadders‐Algra, Mijna
author_sort Akhbari Ziegler, Schirin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Caregivers' experiences during early intervention of their infant with special needs have consequences for their participation in the intervention. Hence, it is vital to understand caregivers' view. This study explored caregivers' experiences with the family‐centred early intervention programme “COPing with and CAring for infants with special needs” (COPCA). METHODS: The data of this qualitative study were collected after 6 months of COPCA intervention in 15 families with an infant with special needs. COPCA was delivered by paediatric physiotherapists in training to become COPCA coaches. Caregivers filled out a study‐specific questionnaire with three open‐ended questions addressing (a) their overall experience with COPCA, (b) what aspects of COPCA they had experienced as important, and (c) what they had learned during the intervention process. The answers were analysed using a content analyses approach. RESULTS: Respondents were mothers. Interrater reliability of the content analyses of the three questions was twice excellent (κ = .95 and κ = .92) and once good (κ = .77). The content analysis of the first question resulted in four categories and three subcategories, for example, evaluation of COPCA as a form of intervention and benefit from COPCA. The content analyses of the second question resulted in eight categories, for example, home‐based intervention, support from the therapist, and the attainment of competences. The content analyses of the third question generated seven categories and four subcategories, for example, to support the infant autonomously at home and to recognize the competences of the infant, caregiver confidence, and relationship with the infant. CONCLUSIONS: The participating mothers appreciated the COPCA early intervention programme. They especially valued its home‐based setting, the support from the coach, and the experience being able to participate as active partners in the intervention make their own decisions. This means that the mothers valued the family‐centred, ecological, and relationship‐based elements of early intervention that currently are recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7003945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70039452020-02-11 Caregivers' experiences with the new family‐centred paediatric physiotherapy programme COPCA: A qualitative study Akhbari Ziegler, Schirin Mitteregger, Elena Hadders‐Algra, Mijna Child Care Health Dev Research Articles BACKGROUND: Caregivers' experiences during early intervention of their infant with special needs have consequences for their participation in the intervention. Hence, it is vital to understand caregivers' view. This study explored caregivers' experiences with the family‐centred early intervention programme “COPing with and CAring for infants with special needs” (COPCA). METHODS: The data of this qualitative study were collected after 6 months of COPCA intervention in 15 families with an infant with special needs. COPCA was delivered by paediatric physiotherapists in training to become COPCA coaches. Caregivers filled out a study‐specific questionnaire with three open‐ended questions addressing (a) their overall experience with COPCA, (b) what aspects of COPCA they had experienced as important, and (c) what they had learned during the intervention process. The answers were analysed using a content analyses approach. RESULTS: Respondents were mothers. Interrater reliability of the content analyses of the three questions was twice excellent (κ = .95 and κ = .92) and once good (κ = .77). The content analysis of the first question resulted in four categories and three subcategories, for example, evaluation of COPCA as a form of intervention and benefit from COPCA. The content analyses of the second question resulted in eight categories, for example, home‐based intervention, support from the therapist, and the attainment of competences. The content analyses of the third question generated seven categories and four subcategories, for example, to support the infant autonomously at home and to recognize the competences of the infant, caregiver confidence, and relationship with the infant. CONCLUSIONS: The participating mothers appreciated the COPCA early intervention programme. They especially valued its home‐based setting, the support from the coach, and the experience being able to participate as active partners in the intervention make their own decisions. This means that the mothers valued the family‐centred, ecological, and relationship‐based elements of early intervention that currently are recommended. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-19 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7003945/ /pubmed/31800118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cch.12722 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Child: Care, Health and Development published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Akhbari Ziegler, Schirin
Mitteregger, Elena
Hadders‐Algra, Mijna
Caregivers' experiences with the new family‐centred paediatric physiotherapy programme COPCA: A qualitative study
title Caregivers' experiences with the new family‐centred paediatric physiotherapy programme COPCA: A qualitative study
title_full Caregivers' experiences with the new family‐centred paediatric physiotherapy programme COPCA: A qualitative study
title_fullStr Caregivers' experiences with the new family‐centred paediatric physiotherapy programme COPCA: A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Caregivers' experiences with the new family‐centred paediatric physiotherapy programme COPCA: A qualitative study
title_short Caregivers' experiences with the new family‐centred paediatric physiotherapy programme COPCA: A qualitative study
title_sort caregivers' experiences with the new family‐centred paediatric physiotherapy programme copca: a qualitative study
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7003945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31800118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cch.12722
work_keys_str_mv AT akhbarizieglerschirin caregiversexperienceswiththenewfamilycentredpaediatricphysiotherapyprogrammecopcaaqualitativestudy
AT mittereggerelena caregiversexperienceswiththenewfamilycentredpaediatricphysiotherapyprogrammecopcaaqualitativestudy
AT haddersalgramijna caregiversexperienceswiththenewfamilycentredpaediatricphysiotherapyprogrammecopcaaqualitativestudy