Cargando…
The systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient Blood Management (PBM) aims to optimize the care of patients who might need a blood transfusion. The International Consensus Conference on PBM (ICC‐PBM) aimed to develop evidence‐based recommendations on three topics: preoperative anaemia, red blood cell transfusio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7004058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31709562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vox.12852 |
_version_ | 1783494652135997440 |
---|---|
author | Van Remoortel, Hans Aranko, Kari Mueller, Markus M. De Buck, Emmy Devine, Dana Folléa, Gilles Meybohm, Patrick Tiberghien, Pierre Wood, Erica M. Vandekerckhove, Philippe Seifried, Erhard |
author_facet | Van Remoortel, Hans Aranko, Kari Mueller, Markus M. De Buck, Emmy Devine, Dana Folléa, Gilles Meybohm, Patrick Tiberghien, Pierre Wood, Erica M. Vandekerckhove, Philippe Seifried, Erhard |
author_sort | Van Remoortel, Hans |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient Blood Management (PBM) aims to optimize the care of patients who might need a blood transfusion. The International Consensus Conference on PBM (ICC‐PBM) aimed to develop evidence‐based recommendations on three topics: preoperative anaemia, red blood cell transfusion thresholds and implementation of PBM programmes. This paper reports how evidence‐based methodologies and technologies were used to enhance shared decision‐making in formulating recommendations during the ICC‐PBM. MATERIALS & METHODS: Systematic reviews on 17 PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) questions were conducted by a Scientific Committee (22 international topic experts and one methodologist) according to GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. Evidence‐based recommendations were formulated using Consensus Development Conference methodology. RESULTS: We screened 17 607 references and included 145 studies. The overall certainty in the evidence of effect estimates was generally low or very low. During the ICC, plenary sessions (100–200 stakeholders from a range of clinical disciplines and community representatives) were followed by closed sessions where multidisciplinary decision‐making panels (>50 experts and patient organizations) formulated recommendations. Two chairs (content‐expert and methodologist) moderated each session and two rapporteurs documented the discussions. The Evidence‐to‐Decision template (GRADEpro software) was used as the central basis in the process of formulating recommendations. CONCLUSION: This ICC‐PBM resulted in 10 clinical and 12 research recommendations supported by an international stakeholder group of experts in blood transfusion. Systematic, rigorous and transparent evidence‐based methodology in a formal consensus format should be the new standard to evaluate (cost‐) effectiveness of medical treatments, such as blood transfusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7004058 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70040582020-02-11 The systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management Van Remoortel, Hans Aranko, Kari Mueller, Markus M. De Buck, Emmy Devine, Dana Folléa, Gilles Meybohm, Patrick Tiberghien, Pierre Wood, Erica M. Vandekerckhove, Philippe Seifried, Erhard Vox Sang Transfusion Medicine and New Therapies BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient Blood Management (PBM) aims to optimize the care of patients who might need a blood transfusion. The International Consensus Conference on PBM (ICC‐PBM) aimed to develop evidence‐based recommendations on three topics: preoperative anaemia, red blood cell transfusion thresholds and implementation of PBM programmes. This paper reports how evidence‐based methodologies and technologies were used to enhance shared decision‐making in formulating recommendations during the ICC‐PBM. MATERIALS & METHODS: Systematic reviews on 17 PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) questions were conducted by a Scientific Committee (22 international topic experts and one methodologist) according to GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. Evidence‐based recommendations were formulated using Consensus Development Conference methodology. RESULTS: We screened 17 607 references and included 145 studies. The overall certainty in the evidence of effect estimates was generally low or very low. During the ICC, plenary sessions (100–200 stakeholders from a range of clinical disciplines and community representatives) were followed by closed sessions where multidisciplinary decision‐making panels (>50 experts and patient organizations) formulated recommendations. Two chairs (content‐expert and methodologist) moderated each session and two rapporteurs documented the discussions. The Evidence‐to‐Decision template (GRADEpro software) was used as the central basis in the process of formulating recommendations. CONCLUSION: This ICC‐PBM resulted in 10 clinical and 12 research recommendations supported by an international stakeholder group of experts in blood transfusion. Systematic, rigorous and transparent evidence‐based methodology in a formal consensus format should be the new standard to evaluate (cost‐) effectiveness of medical treatments, such as blood transfusion. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-10 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7004058/ /pubmed/31709562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vox.12852 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Vox Sanguinis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Blood Transfusion This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Transfusion Medicine and New Therapies Van Remoortel, Hans Aranko, Kari Mueller, Markus M. De Buck, Emmy Devine, Dana Folléa, Gilles Meybohm, Patrick Tiberghien, Pierre Wood, Erica M. Vandekerckhove, Philippe Seifried, Erhard The systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management |
title | The systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management |
title_full | The systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management |
title_fullStr | The systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management |
title_full_unstemmed | The systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management |
title_short | The systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management |
title_sort | systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 international consensus conference on patient blood management |
topic | Transfusion Medicine and New Therapies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7004058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31709562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vox.12852 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanremoortelhans thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT arankokari thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT muellermarkusm thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT debuckemmy thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT devinedana thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT folleagilles thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT meybohmpatrick thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT tiberghienpierre thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT woodericam thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT vandekerckhovephilippe thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT seifriederhard thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT vanremoortelhans systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT arankokari systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT muellermarkusm systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT debuckemmy systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT devinedana systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT folleagilles systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT meybohmpatrick systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT tiberghienpierre systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT woodericam systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT vandekerckhovephilippe systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement AT seifriederhard systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement |