Cargando…

The systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient Blood Management (PBM) aims to optimize the care of patients who might need a blood transfusion. The International Consensus Conference on PBM (ICC‐PBM) aimed to develop evidence‐based recommendations on three topics: preoperative anaemia, red blood cell transfusio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Remoortel, Hans, Aranko, Kari, Mueller, Markus M., De Buck, Emmy, Devine, Dana, Folléa, Gilles, Meybohm, Patrick, Tiberghien, Pierre, Wood, Erica M., Vandekerckhove, Philippe, Seifried, Erhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7004058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31709562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vox.12852
_version_ 1783494652135997440
author Van Remoortel, Hans
Aranko, Kari
Mueller, Markus M.
De Buck, Emmy
Devine, Dana
Folléa, Gilles
Meybohm, Patrick
Tiberghien, Pierre
Wood, Erica M.
Vandekerckhove, Philippe
Seifried, Erhard
author_facet Van Remoortel, Hans
Aranko, Kari
Mueller, Markus M.
De Buck, Emmy
Devine, Dana
Folléa, Gilles
Meybohm, Patrick
Tiberghien, Pierre
Wood, Erica M.
Vandekerckhove, Philippe
Seifried, Erhard
author_sort Van Remoortel, Hans
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient Blood Management (PBM) aims to optimize the care of patients who might need a blood transfusion. The International Consensus Conference on PBM (ICC‐PBM) aimed to develop evidence‐based recommendations on three topics: preoperative anaemia, red blood cell transfusion thresholds and implementation of PBM programmes. This paper reports how evidence‐based methodologies and technologies were used to enhance shared decision‐making in formulating recommendations during the ICC‐PBM. MATERIALS & METHODS: Systematic reviews on 17 PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) questions were conducted by a Scientific Committee (22 international topic experts and one methodologist) according to GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. Evidence‐based recommendations were formulated using Consensus Development Conference methodology. RESULTS: We screened 17 607 references and included 145 studies. The overall certainty in the evidence of effect estimates was generally low or very low. During the ICC, plenary sessions (100–200 stakeholders from a range of clinical disciplines and community representatives) were followed by closed sessions where multidisciplinary decision‐making panels (>50 experts and patient organizations) formulated recommendations. Two chairs (content‐expert and methodologist) moderated each session and two rapporteurs documented the discussions. The Evidence‐to‐Decision template (GRADEpro software) was used as the central basis in the process of formulating recommendations. CONCLUSION: This ICC‐PBM resulted in 10 clinical and 12 research recommendations supported by an international stakeholder group of experts in blood transfusion. Systematic, rigorous and transparent evidence‐based methodology in a formal consensus format should be the new standard to evaluate (cost‐) effectiveness of medical treatments, such as blood transfusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7004058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70040582020-02-11 The systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management Van Remoortel, Hans Aranko, Kari Mueller, Markus M. De Buck, Emmy Devine, Dana Folléa, Gilles Meybohm, Patrick Tiberghien, Pierre Wood, Erica M. Vandekerckhove, Philippe Seifried, Erhard Vox Sang Transfusion Medicine and New Therapies BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient Blood Management (PBM) aims to optimize the care of patients who might need a blood transfusion. The International Consensus Conference on PBM (ICC‐PBM) aimed to develop evidence‐based recommendations on three topics: preoperative anaemia, red blood cell transfusion thresholds and implementation of PBM programmes. This paper reports how evidence‐based methodologies and technologies were used to enhance shared decision‐making in formulating recommendations during the ICC‐PBM. MATERIALS & METHODS: Systematic reviews on 17 PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) questions were conducted by a Scientific Committee (22 international topic experts and one methodologist) according to GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. Evidence‐based recommendations were formulated using Consensus Development Conference methodology. RESULTS: We screened 17 607 references and included 145 studies. The overall certainty in the evidence of effect estimates was generally low or very low. During the ICC, plenary sessions (100–200 stakeholders from a range of clinical disciplines and community representatives) were followed by closed sessions where multidisciplinary decision‐making panels (>50 experts and patient organizations) formulated recommendations. Two chairs (content‐expert and methodologist) moderated each session and two rapporteurs documented the discussions. The Evidence‐to‐Decision template (GRADEpro software) was used as the central basis in the process of formulating recommendations. CONCLUSION: This ICC‐PBM resulted in 10 clinical and 12 research recommendations supported by an international stakeholder group of experts in blood transfusion. Systematic, rigorous and transparent evidence‐based methodology in a formal consensus format should be the new standard to evaluate (cost‐) effectiveness of medical treatments, such as blood transfusion. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-10 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7004058/ /pubmed/31709562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vox.12852 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Vox Sanguinis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Blood Transfusion This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Transfusion Medicine and New Therapies
Van Remoortel, Hans
Aranko, Kari
Mueller, Markus M.
De Buck, Emmy
Devine, Dana
Folléa, Gilles
Meybohm, Patrick
Tiberghien, Pierre
Wood, Erica M.
Vandekerckhove, Philippe
Seifried, Erhard
The systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management
title The systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management
title_full The systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management
title_fullStr The systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management
title_full_unstemmed The systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management
title_short The systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management
title_sort systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 international consensus conference on patient blood management
topic Transfusion Medicine and New Therapies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7004058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31709562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vox.12852
work_keys_str_mv AT vanremoortelhans thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT arankokari thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT muellermarkusm thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT debuckemmy thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT devinedana thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT folleagilles thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT meybohmpatrick thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT tiberghienpierre thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT woodericam thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT vandekerckhovephilippe thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT seifriederhard thesystematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT vanremoortelhans systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT arankokari systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT muellermarkusm systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT debuckemmy systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT devinedana systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT folleagilles systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT meybohmpatrick systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT tiberghienpierre systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT woodericam systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT vandekerckhovephilippe systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement
AT seifriederhard systematicuseofevidencebasedmethodologiesandtechnologiesenhancesshareddecisionmakinginthe2018internationalconsensusconferenceonpatientbloodmanagement