Cargando…
Rasch analysis of the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ)
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ) according to Rasch measurement theory. METHOD: Five hundred twenty‐two post‐discharge patients from a neurological rehabilitation unit were included. The PPRQ questionnaire comprises 20 items rated by a cohort of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7004110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30968514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.13134 |
_version_ | 1783494664391753728 |
---|---|
author | Melin, Jeanette Fornazar, Robin Spångfors, Martin Pendrill, Leslie |
author_facet | Melin, Jeanette Fornazar, Robin Spångfors, Martin Pendrill, Leslie |
author_sort | Melin, Jeanette |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ) according to Rasch measurement theory. METHOD: Five hundred twenty‐two post‐discharge patients from a neurological rehabilitation unit were included. The PPRQ questionnaire comprises 20 items rated by a cohort of 522 patients about their experiences of participating in rehabilitation. The measurement properties of the PPRQ were evaluated by Rasch analysis of the responses. RESULTS: The Rasch analysis of 20 items showed some major misfits, particularly three items addressing the involvement of family members. After removing those items, the model fit improved and no significant DIF remained. Despite improvements, person values (−2.96 to 4.86 logits) were not fully matched by the item values (−0.61 to 0.77 logits). Neither did the t test for unidimensionality meet the criterion of 5%, and local dependency was present. The unidimensionality and local dependency could, however, be accommodated for by four testlets. CONCLUSION: The PPRQ‐17 showed that a ruler with a reasonable and clinical hierarchy can be constructed, although the expectations of dimensionality and local dependency need to be evaluated further. Despite room for further development, PPRQ‐17 nevertheless shows improved measurement precision in terms of patient leniency compared with previous evaluations with classical test theory. In turn, this can play a crucial role when comparing different rehabilitation programs and planning tailored care development activities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7004110 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70041102020-02-11 Rasch analysis of the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ) Melin, Jeanette Fornazar, Robin Spångfors, Martin Pendrill, Leslie J Eval Clin Pract Original Papers OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ) according to Rasch measurement theory. METHOD: Five hundred twenty‐two post‐discharge patients from a neurological rehabilitation unit were included. The PPRQ questionnaire comprises 20 items rated by a cohort of 522 patients about their experiences of participating in rehabilitation. The measurement properties of the PPRQ were evaluated by Rasch analysis of the responses. RESULTS: The Rasch analysis of 20 items showed some major misfits, particularly three items addressing the involvement of family members. After removing those items, the model fit improved and no significant DIF remained. Despite improvements, person values (−2.96 to 4.86 logits) were not fully matched by the item values (−0.61 to 0.77 logits). Neither did the t test for unidimensionality meet the criterion of 5%, and local dependency was present. The unidimensionality and local dependency could, however, be accommodated for by four testlets. CONCLUSION: The PPRQ‐17 showed that a ruler with a reasonable and clinical hierarchy can be constructed, although the expectations of dimensionality and local dependency need to be evaluated further. Despite room for further development, PPRQ‐17 nevertheless shows improved measurement precision in terms of patient leniency compared with previous evaluations with classical test theory. In turn, this can play a crucial role when comparing different rehabilitation programs and planning tailored care development activities. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-09 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7004110/ /pubmed/30968514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.13134 Text en © 2019 The Authors Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers Melin, Jeanette Fornazar, Robin Spångfors, Martin Pendrill, Leslie Rasch analysis of the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ) |
title | Rasch analysis of the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ) |
title_full | Rasch analysis of the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ) |
title_fullStr | Rasch analysis of the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ) |
title_full_unstemmed | Rasch analysis of the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ) |
title_short | Rasch analysis of the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ) |
title_sort | rasch analysis of the patient participation in rehabilitation questionnaire (pprq) |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7004110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30968514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.13134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT melinjeanette raschanalysisofthepatientparticipationinrehabilitationquestionnairepprq AT fornazarrobin raschanalysisofthepatientparticipationinrehabilitationquestionnairepprq AT spangforsmartin raschanalysisofthepatientparticipationinrehabilitationquestionnairepprq AT pendrillleslie raschanalysisofthepatientparticipationinrehabilitationquestionnairepprq |