Cargando…

Rasch analysis of the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ)

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ) according to Rasch measurement theory. METHOD: Five hundred twenty‐two post‐discharge patients from a neurological rehabilitation unit were included. The PPRQ questionnaire comprises 20 items rated by a cohort of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melin, Jeanette, Fornazar, Robin, Spångfors, Martin, Pendrill, Leslie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7004110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30968514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.13134
_version_ 1783494664391753728
author Melin, Jeanette
Fornazar, Robin
Spångfors, Martin
Pendrill, Leslie
author_facet Melin, Jeanette
Fornazar, Robin
Spångfors, Martin
Pendrill, Leslie
author_sort Melin, Jeanette
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ) according to Rasch measurement theory. METHOD: Five hundred twenty‐two post‐discharge patients from a neurological rehabilitation unit were included. The PPRQ questionnaire comprises 20 items rated by a cohort of 522 patients about their experiences of participating in rehabilitation. The measurement properties of the PPRQ were evaluated by Rasch analysis of the responses. RESULTS: The Rasch analysis of 20 items showed some major misfits, particularly three items addressing the involvement of family members. After removing those items, the model fit improved and no significant DIF remained. Despite improvements, person values (−2.96 to 4.86 logits) were not fully matched by the item values (−0.61 to 0.77 logits). Neither did the t test for unidimensionality meet the criterion of 5%, and local dependency was present. The unidimensionality and local dependency could, however, be accommodated for by four testlets. CONCLUSION: The PPRQ‐17 showed that a ruler with a reasonable and clinical hierarchy can be constructed, although the expectations of dimensionality and local dependency need to be evaluated further. Despite room for further development, PPRQ‐17 nevertheless shows improved measurement precision in terms of patient leniency compared with previous evaluations with classical test theory. In turn, this can play a crucial role when comparing different rehabilitation programs and planning tailored care development activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7004110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70041102020-02-11 Rasch analysis of the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ) Melin, Jeanette Fornazar, Robin Spångfors, Martin Pendrill, Leslie J Eval Clin Pract Original Papers OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ) according to Rasch measurement theory. METHOD: Five hundred twenty‐two post‐discharge patients from a neurological rehabilitation unit were included. The PPRQ questionnaire comprises 20 items rated by a cohort of 522 patients about their experiences of participating in rehabilitation. The measurement properties of the PPRQ were evaluated by Rasch analysis of the responses. RESULTS: The Rasch analysis of 20 items showed some major misfits, particularly three items addressing the involvement of family members. After removing those items, the model fit improved and no significant DIF remained. Despite improvements, person values (−2.96 to 4.86 logits) were not fully matched by the item values (−0.61 to 0.77 logits). Neither did the t test for unidimensionality meet the criterion of 5%, and local dependency was present. The unidimensionality and local dependency could, however, be accommodated for by four testlets. CONCLUSION: The PPRQ‐17 showed that a ruler with a reasonable and clinical hierarchy can be constructed, although the expectations of dimensionality and local dependency need to be evaluated further. Despite room for further development, PPRQ‐17 nevertheless shows improved measurement precision in terms of patient leniency compared with previous evaluations with classical test theory. In turn, this can play a crucial role when comparing different rehabilitation programs and planning tailored care development activities. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-09 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7004110/ /pubmed/30968514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.13134 Text en © 2019 The Authors Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Melin, Jeanette
Fornazar, Robin
Spångfors, Martin
Pendrill, Leslie
Rasch analysis of the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ)
title Rasch analysis of the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ)
title_full Rasch analysis of the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ)
title_fullStr Rasch analysis of the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ)
title_full_unstemmed Rasch analysis of the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ)
title_short Rasch analysis of the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ)
title_sort rasch analysis of the patient participation in rehabilitation questionnaire (pprq)
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7004110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30968514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.13134
work_keys_str_mv AT melinjeanette raschanalysisofthepatientparticipationinrehabilitationquestionnairepprq
AT fornazarrobin raschanalysisofthepatientparticipationinrehabilitationquestionnairepprq
AT spangforsmartin raschanalysisofthepatientparticipationinrehabilitationquestionnairepprq
AT pendrillleslie raschanalysisofthepatientparticipationinrehabilitationquestionnairepprq