Cargando…
Age does not affect sex effect of conditioned pain modulation of pressure and thermal pain across 2 conditioning stimuli
INTRODUCTION: Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is a laboratory test resulting in pain inhibition through activation of descending inhibitory mechanisms. Older adults consistently demonstrate reduced CPM compared with younger samples; however, studies of sex differences in younger cohorts have shown...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7004505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32072094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000796 |
_version_ | 1783494737685118976 |
---|---|
author | Riley, Joseph L. Cruz-Almeida, Yenisel Staud, Roland Fillingim, Roger B. |
author_facet | Riley, Joseph L. Cruz-Almeida, Yenisel Staud, Roland Fillingim, Roger B. |
author_sort | Riley, Joseph L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is a laboratory test resulting in pain inhibition through activation of descending inhibitory mechanisms. Older adults consistently demonstrate reduced CPM compared with younger samples; however, studies of sex differences in younger cohorts have shown mixed results. OBJECTIVES: This study tested for sex differences in CPM within samples of younger and older adults. METHODS: Participants were 67 younger adults (mean age = 25.4 years) and 50 older adults (66.4 years). Study conditioning paradigms were the cold-pressor test and contact heat pain administered in separate sessions. Pressure pain threshold and ramping suprathreshold heat were the test stimuli across three time points after presentation of the conditioning stimuli (CS). RESULTS: Significant inhibition was observed during both testing sessions. The hypothesis for sex differences across both age cohorts was supported only for ∆PPTh. However, sex differences did not reach significance for either paradigm using ascending suprathreshold heat as the test stimuli. The overall trend was that younger males experienced the strongest CPM and older females the weakest. From a methodological perspective, duration differences were seen in CPM, with inhibition decaying more quickly for PPTh than for suprathreshold heat pain. Furthermore, there were no differences in inhibition induced by cold-pressor test and contact heat pain as CS. CONCLUSION: Sex differences were similar across both age cohorts with males experiencing greater inhibition than females. Cross-sectional associations were also demonstrated between CPM inhibition and measures of recent pain, further supporting CPM as an experimental model with clinical utility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7004505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70045052020-02-18 Age does not affect sex effect of conditioned pain modulation of pressure and thermal pain across 2 conditioning stimuli Riley, Joseph L. Cruz-Almeida, Yenisel Staud, Roland Fillingim, Roger B. Pain Rep General Section INTRODUCTION: Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is a laboratory test resulting in pain inhibition through activation of descending inhibitory mechanisms. Older adults consistently demonstrate reduced CPM compared with younger samples; however, studies of sex differences in younger cohorts have shown mixed results. OBJECTIVES: This study tested for sex differences in CPM within samples of younger and older adults. METHODS: Participants were 67 younger adults (mean age = 25.4 years) and 50 older adults (66.4 years). Study conditioning paradigms were the cold-pressor test and contact heat pain administered in separate sessions. Pressure pain threshold and ramping suprathreshold heat were the test stimuli across three time points after presentation of the conditioning stimuli (CS). RESULTS: Significant inhibition was observed during both testing sessions. The hypothesis for sex differences across both age cohorts was supported only for ∆PPTh. However, sex differences did not reach significance for either paradigm using ascending suprathreshold heat as the test stimuli. The overall trend was that younger males experienced the strongest CPM and older females the weakest. From a methodological perspective, duration differences were seen in CPM, with inhibition decaying more quickly for PPTh than for suprathreshold heat pain. Furthermore, there were no differences in inhibition induced by cold-pressor test and contact heat pain as CS. CONCLUSION: Sex differences were similar across both age cohorts with males experiencing greater inhibition than females. Cross-sectional associations were also demonstrated between CPM inhibition and measures of recent pain, further supporting CPM as an experimental model with clinical utility. Wolters Kluwer 2019-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7004505/ /pubmed/32072094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000796 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The International Association for the Study of Pain. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | General Section Riley, Joseph L. Cruz-Almeida, Yenisel Staud, Roland Fillingim, Roger B. Age does not affect sex effect of conditioned pain modulation of pressure and thermal pain across 2 conditioning stimuli |
title | Age does not affect sex effect of conditioned pain modulation of pressure and thermal pain across 2 conditioning stimuli |
title_full | Age does not affect sex effect of conditioned pain modulation of pressure and thermal pain across 2 conditioning stimuli |
title_fullStr | Age does not affect sex effect of conditioned pain modulation of pressure and thermal pain across 2 conditioning stimuli |
title_full_unstemmed | Age does not affect sex effect of conditioned pain modulation of pressure and thermal pain across 2 conditioning stimuli |
title_short | Age does not affect sex effect of conditioned pain modulation of pressure and thermal pain across 2 conditioning stimuli |
title_sort | age does not affect sex effect of conditioned pain modulation of pressure and thermal pain across 2 conditioning stimuli |
topic | General Section |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7004505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32072094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000796 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rileyjosephl agedoesnotaffectsexeffectofconditionedpainmodulationofpressureandthermalpainacross2conditioningstimuli AT cruzalmeidayenisel agedoesnotaffectsexeffectofconditionedpainmodulationofpressureandthermalpainacross2conditioningstimuli AT staudroland agedoesnotaffectsexeffectofconditionedpainmodulationofpressureandthermalpainacross2conditioningstimuli AT fillingimrogerb agedoesnotaffectsexeffectofconditionedpainmodulationofpressureandthermalpainacross2conditioningstimuli |