Cargando…
Single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective study
BACKGROUND: The incidence of uterine cesarean scar defect (niche) is high, and some patients require surgery. Single-port laparoscopy can reduce post-operative pain, and provide better cosmetic effects. This study was performed to evaluate the safety and superiority of single-port laparoscopy-assist...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7004616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31929361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000622 |
_version_ | 1783494763217944576 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yong-Li Wang, Guo-Cheng Qu, Jun-Jie Du, Gui-Qiang Zhou, Wei-Qiang |
author_facet | Zhang, Yong-Li Wang, Guo-Cheng Qu, Jun-Jie Du, Gui-Qiang Zhou, Wei-Qiang |
author_sort | Zhang, Yong-Li |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The incidence of uterine cesarean scar defect (niche) is high, and some patients require surgery. Single-port laparoscopy can reduce post-operative pain, and provide better cosmetic effects. This study was performed to evaluate the safety and superiority of single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of uterine cesarean scar defect (niche) in women after cesarean section. METHODS: This study included 74 patients who were diagnosed with uterine cesarean niche at the Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital from January 2013 to June 2015. Thirty-seven patients underwent single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal surgery as the case group, and the remaining patients underwent vaginal repair surgery as the control group. We collected data from the inpatient and follow-up medical records. The clinical characteristics of these two groups were compared. The odds ratios and 95% confidential intervals were calculated for each variable by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Patients who underwent single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair had a significantly longer operation time (2.3 [2.0–2.7] vs. 2.0 [1.6–2.3] h, P = 0.015), shorter gas passage time (1.2 [1.0–1.5] vs. 1.7 [1.0–2.0] days, P = 0.012), shorter hospital stay (3.1 [3.0–4.0] vs. 4.5 [4.0–6.0] days, P = 0.019), and fewer complications (0 vs. 4 cases). Univariate analysis showed that depth of the niche (P = 0.021) the mild adhesiolysis score (P = 0.035) and moderate adhesiolysis score (P = 0.013) were associated with the bladder injury. Multivariate analysis showed that the moderate adhesiolysis score (P = 0.029; 95% confidence interval, 1.318–3.526) was the strongest independent predictor of bladder injury. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the safety and superiority of single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of uterine cesarean scars. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7004616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70046162020-02-11 Single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective study Zhang, Yong-Li Wang, Guo-Cheng Qu, Jun-Jie Du, Gui-Qiang Zhou, Wei-Qiang Chin Med J (Engl) Original Articles BACKGROUND: The incidence of uterine cesarean scar defect (niche) is high, and some patients require surgery. Single-port laparoscopy can reduce post-operative pain, and provide better cosmetic effects. This study was performed to evaluate the safety and superiority of single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of uterine cesarean scar defect (niche) in women after cesarean section. METHODS: This study included 74 patients who were diagnosed with uterine cesarean niche at the Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital from January 2013 to June 2015. Thirty-seven patients underwent single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal surgery as the case group, and the remaining patients underwent vaginal repair surgery as the control group. We collected data from the inpatient and follow-up medical records. The clinical characteristics of these two groups were compared. The odds ratios and 95% confidential intervals were calculated for each variable by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Patients who underwent single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair had a significantly longer operation time (2.3 [2.0–2.7] vs. 2.0 [1.6–2.3] h, P = 0.015), shorter gas passage time (1.2 [1.0–1.5] vs. 1.7 [1.0–2.0] days, P = 0.012), shorter hospital stay (3.1 [3.0–4.0] vs. 4.5 [4.0–6.0] days, P = 0.019), and fewer complications (0 vs. 4 cases). Univariate analysis showed that depth of the niche (P = 0.021) the mild adhesiolysis score (P = 0.035) and moderate adhesiolysis score (P = 0.013) were associated with the bladder injury. Multivariate analysis showed that the moderate adhesiolysis score (P = 0.029; 95% confidence interval, 1.318–3.526) was the strongest independent predictor of bladder injury. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the safety and superiority of single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of uterine cesarean scars. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-02-05 2020-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7004616/ /pubmed/31929361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000622 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Zhang, Yong-Li Wang, Guo-Cheng Qu, Jun-Jie Du, Gui-Qiang Zhou, Wei-Qiang Single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective study |
title | Single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective study |
title_full | Single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective study |
title_short | Single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective study |
title_sort | single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7004616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31929361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000622 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyongli singleportlaparoscopyassistedvaginalrepairofacesareanscardefectasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT wangguocheng singleportlaparoscopyassistedvaginalrepairofacesareanscardefectasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT qujunjie singleportlaparoscopyassistedvaginalrepairofacesareanscardefectasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT duguiqiang singleportlaparoscopyassistedvaginalrepairofacesareanscardefectasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT zhouweiqiang singleportlaparoscopyassistedvaginalrepairofacesareanscardefectasinglecenterretrospectivestudy |