Cargando…
Prognostic value of (18)F-FET PET/CT in newly diagnosed WHO 2016 high-grade glioma
O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine positron-emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FET PET/CT) is well known in brain tumor management. Our study aimed to identify the prognostic value of (18)F-FET PET/CT in high-grade gliomas (HGG) according the current 2016 World Health Organization (WHO)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7004648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32000446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019017 |
_version_ | 1783494770710020096 |
---|---|
author | Dissaux, Gurvan Basse, Victor Schick, Ulrike EL Kabbaj, Osman Auberger, Benjamin Magro, Elsa Kassoul, Aboubakr Abgral, Ronan Salaun, Pierre-Yves Bourhis, David Querellou, Solène |
author_facet | Dissaux, Gurvan Basse, Victor Schick, Ulrike EL Kabbaj, Osman Auberger, Benjamin Magro, Elsa Kassoul, Aboubakr Abgral, Ronan Salaun, Pierre-Yves Bourhis, David Querellou, Solène |
author_sort | Dissaux, Gurvan |
collection | PubMed |
description | O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine positron-emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FET PET/CT) is well known in brain tumor management. Our study aimed to identify the prognostic value of (18)F-FET PET/CT in high-grade gliomas (HGG) according the current 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Patients with histologically proven WHO 2016 HGG were prospectively included. A dynamic (18)F-FET PET/CT was performed allowing to obtain 2 static PET frames (static frame 1: 20–40 minutes and static frame 2: 2–22 minutes). We analyzed static parameters (standard uptake value [SUV]max, SUVmean, SUVpeak, TBRmax, TBRmean, tumoral lesion glycolysis, and metabolic tumoral volume) for various isocontours (from 10% to 90%). PET parameters, clinical features, and molecular biomarkers were compared with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in univariate and multivariate analysis. Twenty-nine patients were included (grade III n = 3, grade IV n = 26). Mean PFS and OS were, respectively, 8.8 and 13.9 months. According to univariate analysis, SUVmean, SUVpeak, TBRmax, and TBRmean were significantly correlated with OS. In static 1 analysis, TBRmax seemed to be the best OS prognostic parameter (P = .004). In static 2 analysis, TBRmean was the best parameter (P = .01). In static 1 analysis, only SUVpeak was significant (P = .05) for PFS. Good performance status (PS < 2; P < .0001) and extent of resection (P = .019) identified the subgroup of patients with the best OS. Only TBRmax (P = .026) and extent of resection (P = .025) remained significant parameters in multivariate analysis. Our data suggested that high TBRmax seemed to be the most significant OS independent prognostic factor in patients with newly diagnosed HGG. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7004648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70046482020-02-18 Prognostic value of (18)F-FET PET/CT in newly diagnosed WHO 2016 high-grade glioma Dissaux, Gurvan Basse, Victor Schick, Ulrike EL Kabbaj, Osman Auberger, Benjamin Magro, Elsa Kassoul, Aboubakr Abgral, Ronan Salaun, Pierre-Yves Bourhis, David Querellou, Solène Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine positron-emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FET PET/CT) is well known in brain tumor management. Our study aimed to identify the prognostic value of (18)F-FET PET/CT in high-grade gliomas (HGG) according the current 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Patients with histologically proven WHO 2016 HGG were prospectively included. A dynamic (18)F-FET PET/CT was performed allowing to obtain 2 static PET frames (static frame 1: 20–40 minutes and static frame 2: 2–22 minutes). We analyzed static parameters (standard uptake value [SUV]max, SUVmean, SUVpeak, TBRmax, TBRmean, tumoral lesion glycolysis, and metabolic tumoral volume) for various isocontours (from 10% to 90%). PET parameters, clinical features, and molecular biomarkers were compared with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in univariate and multivariate analysis. Twenty-nine patients were included (grade III n = 3, grade IV n = 26). Mean PFS and OS were, respectively, 8.8 and 13.9 months. According to univariate analysis, SUVmean, SUVpeak, TBRmax, and TBRmean were significantly correlated with OS. In static 1 analysis, TBRmax seemed to be the best OS prognostic parameter (P = .004). In static 2 analysis, TBRmean was the best parameter (P = .01). In static 1 analysis, only SUVpeak was significant (P = .05) for PFS. Good performance status (PS < 2; P < .0001) and extent of resection (P = .019) identified the subgroup of patients with the best OS. Only TBRmax (P = .026) and extent of resection (P = .025) remained significant parameters in multivariate analysis. Our data suggested that high TBRmax seemed to be the most significant OS independent prognostic factor in patients with newly diagnosed HGG. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7004648/ /pubmed/32000446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019017 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5700 Dissaux, Gurvan Basse, Victor Schick, Ulrike EL Kabbaj, Osman Auberger, Benjamin Magro, Elsa Kassoul, Aboubakr Abgral, Ronan Salaun, Pierre-Yves Bourhis, David Querellou, Solène Prognostic value of (18)F-FET PET/CT in newly diagnosed WHO 2016 high-grade glioma |
title | Prognostic value of (18)F-FET PET/CT in newly diagnosed WHO 2016 high-grade glioma |
title_full | Prognostic value of (18)F-FET PET/CT in newly diagnosed WHO 2016 high-grade glioma |
title_fullStr | Prognostic value of (18)F-FET PET/CT in newly diagnosed WHO 2016 high-grade glioma |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic value of (18)F-FET PET/CT in newly diagnosed WHO 2016 high-grade glioma |
title_short | Prognostic value of (18)F-FET PET/CT in newly diagnosed WHO 2016 high-grade glioma |
title_sort | prognostic value of (18)f-fet pet/ct in newly diagnosed who 2016 high-grade glioma |
topic | 5700 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7004648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32000446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dissauxgurvan prognosticvalueof18ffetpetctinnewlydiagnosedwho2016highgradeglioma AT bassevictor prognosticvalueof18ffetpetctinnewlydiagnosedwho2016highgradeglioma AT schickulrike prognosticvalueof18ffetpetctinnewlydiagnosedwho2016highgradeglioma AT elkabbajosman prognosticvalueof18ffetpetctinnewlydiagnosedwho2016highgradeglioma AT aubergerbenjamin prognosticvalueof18ffetpetctinnewlydiagnosedwho2016highgradeglioma AT magroelsa prognosticvalueof18ffetpetctinnewlydiagnosedwho2016highgradeglioma AT kassoulaboubakr prognosticvalueof18ffetpetctinnewlydiagnosedwho2016highgradeglioma AT abgralronan prognosticvalueof18ffetpetctinnewlydiagnosedwho2016highgradeglioma AT salaunpierreyves prognosticvalueof18ffetpetctinnewlydiagnosedwho2016highgradeglioma AT bourhisdavid prognosticvalueof18ffetpetctinnewlydiagnosedwho2016highgradeglioma AT querellousolene prognosticvalueof18ffetpetctinnewlydiagnosedwho2016highgradeglioma |