Cargando…

Doppler Ultrasound for Heart Rate Assessment in a Porcine Model of Neonatal Asphyxia

Objectives: Approximately 10% of newborn infants require resuscitation at birth. Accurate heart rate (HR) assessment guides resuscitation interventions, thereby reducing morbidities and mortality. While existing HR assessment methods have several limitations, the Doppler ultrasound (Doppler-US) migh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morina, Nicolò, Johnson, Peter A., O'Reilly, Megan, Lee, Tze-Fun, Yaskina, Maryna, Cheung, Po-Yin, Schmölzer, Georg M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7004956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32083045
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00018
_version_ 1783494827451613184
author Morina, Nicolò
Johnson, Peter A.
O'Reilly, Megan
Lee, Tze-Fun
Yaskina, Maryna
Cheung, Po-Yin
Schmölzer, Georg M.
author_facet Morina, Nicolò
Johnson, Peter A.
O'Reilly, Megan
Lee, Tze-Fun
Yaskina, Maryna
Cheung, Po-Yin
Schmölzer, Georg M.
author_sort Morina, Nicolò
collection PubMed
description Objectives: Approximately 10% of newborn infants require resuscitation at birth. Accurate heart rate (HR) assessment guides resuscitation interventions, thereby reducing morbidities and mortality. While existing HR assessment methods have several limitations, the Doppler ultrasound (Doppler-US) might be a promising alternative. We aimed to evaluate accuracy and optimal use of Doppler-US for HR assessments during neonatal asphyxia in a pre-clinical model. Design: HR assessments were performed in 16 term newborn piglets that were anesthetized, intubated, and instrumented. Study I evaluated optimal transducer position, Study II compared aortic (AV) and pulmonary (PV) examination modes, and Study III examined accuracy during asphyxia, for HR assessment. Setting: Experimental setting. Subjects: Asphyxia-induced piglets. Interventions: Study I: Doppler-US (USCOM® 1A) HR was assessed on upper (A), middle (B), and lower (C) third of the sternum; study II: Doppler-US HR was assessed using AV and PV examination modes; study III: HR was assessed during asphyxia. Comparisons were made between Doppler-US and the clinical gold standard for HR assessments, electrocardiography (ECG). Measurements and Main Results: Study I: Mean (SD) Doppler-US HR at position A, B, and C showed no difference when compared to ECG HR. Study II: The mean (SD) Doppler-US HR using AV and PV modes also showed no difference when compared to ECG HR. Study III: Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between Doppler-US and ECG HR of 1.5 (−16 to 19) bpm. Additionally, motion artifacts produced false peaks and peak size was seen to decrease as bradycardia progressed. Conclusions: HR assessment using Doppler-US during asphyxia is accurate but has limitations and must be further evaluated prior to clinical use. Doppler-US can be positioned along the sternum and use either AV or PV mode for accurate assessments in a piglet model of neonatal asphyxia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7004956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70049562020-02-20 Doppler Ultrasound for Heart Rate Assessment in a Porcine Model of Neonatal Asphyxia Morina, Nicolò Johnson, Peter A. O'Reilly, Megan Lee, Tze-Fun Yaskina, Maryna Cheung, Po-Yin Schmölzer, Georg M. Front Pediatr Pediatrics Objectives: Approximately 10% of newborn infants require resuscitation at birth. Accurate heart rate (HR) assessment guides resuscitation interventions, thereby reducing morbidities and mortality. While existing HR assessment methods have several limitations, the Doppler ultrasound (Doppler-US) might be a promising alternative. We aimed to evaluate accuracy and optimal use of Doppler-US for HR assessments during neonatal asphyxia in a pre-clinical model. Design: HR assessments were performed in 16 term newborn piglets that were anesthetized, intubated, and instrumented. Study I evaluated optimal transducer position, Study II compared aortic (AV) and pulmonary (PV) examination modes, and Study III examined accuracy during asphyxia, for HR assessment. Setting: Experimental setting. Subjects: Asphyxia-induced piglets. Interventions: Study I: Doppler-US (USCOM® 1A) HR was assessed on upper (A), middle (B), and lower (C) third of the sternum; study II: Doppler-US HR was assessed using AV and PV examination modes; study III: HR was assessed during asphyxia. Comparisons were made between Doppler-US and the clinical gold standard for HR assessments, electrocardiography (ECG). Measurements and Main Results: Study I: Mean (SD) Doppler-US HR at position A, B, and C showed no difference when compared to ECG HR. Study II: The mean (SD) Doppler-US HR using AV and PV modes also showed no difference when compared to ECG HR. Study III: Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between Doppler-US and ECG HR of 1.5 (−16 to 19) bpm. Additionally, motion artifacts produced false peaks and peak size was seen to decrease as bradycardia progressed. Conclusions: HR assessment using Doppler-US during asphyxia is accurate but has limitations and must be further evaluated prior to clinical use. Doppler-US can be positioned along the sternum and use either AV or PV mode for accurate assessments in a piglet model of neonatal asphyxia. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7004956/ /pubmed/32083045 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00018 Text en Copyright © 2020 Morina, Johnson, O'Reilly, Lee, Yaskina, Cheung and Schmölzer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Morina, Nicolò
Johnson, Peter A.
O'Reilly, Megan
Lee, Tze-Fun
Yaskina, Maryna
Cheung, Po-Yin
Schmölzer, Georg M.
Doppler Ultrasound for Heart Rate Assessment in a Porcine Model of Neonatal Asphyxia
title Doppler Ultrasound for Heart Rate Assessment in a Porcine Model of Neonatal Asphyxia
title_full Doppler Ultrasound for Heart Rate Assessment in a Porcine Model of Neonatal Asphyxia
title_fullStr Doppler Ultrasound for Heart Rate Assessment in a Porcine Model of Neonatal Asphyxia
title_full_unstemmed Doppler Ultrasound for Heart Rate Assessment in a Porcine Model of Neonatal Asphyxia
title_short Doppler Ultrasound for Heart Rate Assessment in a Porcine Model of Neonatal Asphyxia
title_sort doppler ultrasound for heart rate assessment in a porcine model of neonatal asphyxia
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7004956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32083045
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00018
work_keys_str_mv AT morinanicolo dopplerultrasoundforheartrateassessmentinaporcinemodelofneonatalasphyxia
AT johnsonpetera dopplerultrasoundforheartrateassessmentinaporcinemodelofneonatalasphyxia
AT oreillymegan dopplerultrasoundforheartrateassessmentinaporcinemodelofneonatalasphyxia
AT leetzefun dopplerultrasoundforheartrateassessmentinaporcinemodelofneonatalasphyxia
AT yaskinamaryna dopplerultrasoundforheartrateassessmentinaporcinemodelofneonatalasphyxia
AT cheungpoyin dopplerultrasoundforheartrateassessmentinaporcinemodelofneonatalasphyxia
AT schmolzergeorgm dopplerultrasoundforheartrateassessmentinaporcinemodelofneonatalasphyxia