Cargando…

The (68)Ga/(177)Lu-theragnostic concept in PSMA-targeting of metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer: impact of post-therapeutic whole-body scintigraphy in the follow-up

INTRODUCTION: A new therapeutic option for metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) of heavily pre-treated patients lies in (177)Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy. METHODS: On the basis of PSMA-targeted (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, 32 consecutive mCRPC patients were selected for (177)Lu-PSMA-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maffey-Steffan, Johanna, Scarpa, Lorenza, Svirydenka, Anna, Nilica, Bernhard, Mair, Christian, Buxbaum, Sabine, Bektic, Jasmin, von Guggenberg, Elisabeth, Uprimny, Christian, Horninger, Wolfgang, Virgolini, Irene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7005064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31776632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04583-2
_version_ 1783494852964515840
author Maffey-Steffan, Johanna
Scarpa, Lorenza
Svirydenka, Anna
Nilica, Bernhard
Mair, Christian
Buxbaum, Sabine
Bektic, Jasmin
von Guggenberg, Elisabeth
Uprimny, Christian
Horninger, Wolfgang
Virgolini, Irene
author_facet Maffey-Steffan, Johanna
Scarpa, Lorenza
Svirydenka, Anna
Nilica, Bernhard
Mair, Christian
Buxbaum, Sabine
Bektic, Jasmin
von Guggenberg, Elisabeth
Uprimny, Christian
Horninger, Wolfgang
Virgolini, Irene
author_sort Maffey-Steffan, Johanna
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A new therapeutic option for metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) of heavily pre-treated patients lies in (177)Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy. METHODS: On the basis of PSMA-targeted (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, 32 consecutive mCRPC patients were selected for (177)Lu-PSMA-617 therapy (6 GBq/cycle, 2 to 6 cycles, 6–10 weeks apart) and followed until death. Post-therapy whole-body (WB) dosimetry and (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT data were compared and related to progression free and overall survival. RESULTS: (177)Lu-PSMA-617 dosimetry after the first cycle indicated high tumor doses for skeletal (4.01 ± 2.64; range 1.10–13.00 Gy/GBq), lymph node (3.12 ± 2.07; range 0.70–8.70 Gy/GBq), and liver (2.97 ± 1.38; range 0.76–5.00 Gy/GBq) metastases whereas the dose for tissues/organs was acceptable in all patients for an intention-to-treat activity of 24 GBq. Any PSA decrease after the first cycle was found in 23/32 (72%), after the second cycle in 22/32 (69%), after the third cycle in 16/28 (57%), and after the fourth cycle in 8/18 (44%) patients. Post-therapy 24 h WB scintigraphy showed decreased tumor-to-background ratios in 24/32 (75%) after the first therapy cycle, after the second cycle in 17/29 (59%), and after the third cycle in 13/21 (62%) patients. The median PFS was 7 months and the median OS 12 months. In the group of PSA responders (n = 22) the median OS was 17 months versus 11 months in the group of non-responders (n = 10), p < 0.05. Decreasing SUV(max) values were found for parotid (15.93 ± 6.23 versus 12.33 ± 4.07) and submandibular glands (17.65 ± 7.34 versus 13.12 ± 4.62) following treatment, along with transient (n = 6) or permanent (n = 2) xerostomia in 8/32 (25%) patients. In 3/32 patients, nephrotoxicity changed from Grade 2 to 3, whereas neither Grade 4 nephrotoxicity nor hematotoxicity was found. In most patients a good agreement was observed for the visual interpretation of the tracer accumulation between 24 h WB and PET/CT scans. However, no significance could be calculated for baseline-absorbed tumor doses and SUV(max) values of tumor lesions. 5/32 (16%) patients showed a mixed response pattern, which resulted in disease progression over time. CONCLUSION: Serial PSA measurements and post-therapy 24 h WB scintigraphy seems to allow a sufficiently accurate follow-up of (177)Lu-PSMA-617-treated mCRPC patients whereas (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT should be performed for patient selection and final response assessment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-019-04583-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7005064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70050642020-02-25 The (68)Ga/(177)Lu-theragnostic concept in PSMA-targeting of metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer: impact of post-therapeutic whole-body scintigraphy in the follow-up Maffey-Steffan, Johanna Scarpa, Lorenza Svirydenka, Anna Nilica, Bernhard Mair, Christian Buxbaum, Sabine Bektic, Jasmin von Guggenberg, Elisabeth Uprimny, Christian Horninger, Wolfgang Virgolini, Irene Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article INTRODUCTION: A new therapeutic option for metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) of heavily pre-treated patients lies in (177)Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy. METHODS: On the basis of PSMA-targeted (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, 32 consecutive mCRPC patients were selected for (177)Lu-PSMA-617 therapy (6 GBq/cycle, 2 to 6 cycles, 6–10 weeks apart) and followed until death. Post-therapy whole-body (WB) dosimetry and (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT data were compared and related to progression free and overall survival. RESULTS: (177)Lu-PSMA-617 dosimetry after the first cycle indicated high tumor doses for skeletal (4.01 ± 2.64; range 1.10–13.00 Gy/GBq), lymph node (3.12 ± 2.07; range 0.70–8.70 Gy/GBq), and liver (2.97 ± 1.38; range 0.76–5.00 Gy/GBq) metastases whereas the dose for tissues/organs was acceptable in all patients for an intention-to-treat activity of 24 GBq. Any PSA decrease after the first cycle was found in 23/32 (72%), after the second cycle in 22/32 (69%), after the third cycle in 16/28 (57%), and after the fourth cycle in 8/18 (44%) patients. Post-therapy 24 h WB scintigraphy showed decreased tumor-to-background ratios in 24/32 (75%) after the first therapy cycle, after the second cycle in 17/29 (59%), and after the third cycle in 13/21 (62%) patients. The median PFS was 7 months and the median OS 12 months. In the group of PSA responders (n = 22) the median OS was 17 months versus 11 months in the group of non-responders (n = 10), p < 0.05. Decreasing SUV(max) values were found for parotid (15.93 ± 6.23 versus 12.33 ± 4.07) and submandibular glands (17.65 ± 7.34 versus 13.12 ± 4.62) following treatment, along with transient (n = 6) or permanent (n = 2) xerostomia in 8/32 (25%) patients. In 3/32 patients, nephrotoxicity changed from Grade 2 to 3, whereas neither Grade 4 nephrotoxicity nor hematotoxicity was found. In most patients a good agreement was observed for the visual interpretation of the tracer accumulation between 24 h WB and PET/CT scans. However, no significance could be calculated for baseline-absorbed tumor doses and SUV(max) values of tumor lesions. 5/32 (16%) patients showed a mixed response pattern, which resulted in disease progression over time. CONCLUSION: Serial PSA measurements and post-therapy 24 h WB scintigraphy seems to allow a sufficiently accurate follow-up of (177)Lu-PSMA-617-treated mCRPC patients whereas (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT should be performed for patient selection and final response assessment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-019-04583-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-11-27 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7005064/ /pubmed/31776632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04583-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019, corrected publication 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Maffey-Steffan, Johanna
Scarpa, Lorenza
Svirydenka, Anna
Nilica, Bernhard
Mair, Christian
Buxbaum, Sabine
Bektic, Jasmin
von Guggenberg, Elisabeth
Uprimny, Christian
Horninger, Wolfgang
Virgolini, Irene
The (68)Ga/(177)Lu-theragnostic concept in PSMA-targeting of metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer: impact of post-therapeutic whole-body scintigraphy in the follow-up
title The (68)Ga/(177)Lu-theragnostic concept in PSMA-targeting of metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer: impact of post-therapeutic whole-body scintigraphy in the follow-up
title_full The (68)Ga/(177)Lu-theragnostic concept in PSMA-targeting of metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer: impact of post-therapeutic whole-body scintigraphy in the follow-up
title_fullStr The (68)Ga/(177)Lu-theragnostic concept in PSMA-targeting of metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer: impact of post-therapeutic whole-body scintigraphy in the follow-up
title_full_unstemmed The (68)Ga/(177)Lu-theragnostic concept in PSMA-targeting of metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer: impact of post-therapeutic whole-body scintigraphy in the follow-up
title_short The (68)Ga/(177)Lu-theragnostic concept in PSMA-targeting of metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer: impact of post-therapeutic whole-body scintigraphy in the follow-up
title_sort (68)ga/(177)lu-theragnostic concept in psma-targeting of metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer: impact of post-therapeutic whole-body scintigraphy in the follow-up
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7005064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31776632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04583-2
work_keys_str_mv AT maffeysteffanjohanna the68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT scarpalorenza the68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT svirydenkaanna the68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT nilicabernhard the68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT mairchristian the68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT buxbaumsabine the68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT bekticjasmin the68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT vonguggenbergelisabeth the68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT uprimnychristian the68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT horningerwolfgang the68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT virgoliniirene the68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT maffeysteffanjohanna 68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT scarpalorenza 68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT svirydenkaanna 68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT nilicabernhard 68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT mairchristian 68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT buxbaumsabine 68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT bekticjasmin 68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT vonguggenbergelisabeth 68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT uprimnychristian 68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT horningerwolfgang 68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup
AT virgoliniirene 68ga177lutheragnosticconceptinpsmatargetingofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerimpactofposttherapeuticwholebodyscintigraphyinthefollowup