Cargando…
The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach
Machine learning (ML) applied to patient-reported (PROs) and clinical-assessed outcomes (CAOs) could favour a more predictive and personalized medicine. Our aim was to confirm the important role of applying ML to PROs and CAOs of people with relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7005074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31659583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04093-x |
_version_ | 1783494855305986048 |
---|---|
author | Brichetto, Giampaolo Monti Bragadin, Margherita Fiorini, Samuele Battaglia, Mario Alberto Konrad, Giovanna Ponzio, Michela Pedullà, Ludovico Verri, Alessandro Barla, Annalisa Tacchino, Andrea |
author_facet | Brichetto, Giampaolo Monti Bragadin, Margherita Fiorini, Samuele Battaglia, Mario Alberto Konrad, Giovanna Ponzio, Michela Pedullà, Ludovico Verri, Alessandro Barla, Annalisa Tacchino, Andrea |
author_sort | Brichetto, Giampaolo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Machine learning (ML) applied to patient-reported (PROs) and clinical-assessed outcomes (CAOs) could favour a more predictive and personalized medicine. Our aim was to confirm the important role of applying ML to PROs and CAOs of people with relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) form of multiple sclerosis (MS), to promptly identifying information useful to predict disease progression. For our analysis, a dataset of 3398 evaluations from 810 persons with MS (PwMS) was adopted. Three steps were provided: course classification; extraction of the most relevant predictors at the next time point; prediction if the patient will experience the transition from RR to SP at the next time point. The Current Course Assignment (CCA) step correctly assigned the current MS course with an accuracy of about 86.0%. The MS course at the next time point can be predicted using the predictors selected in CCA. PROs/CAOs Evolution Prediction (PEP) followed by Future Course Assignment (FCA) was able to foresee the course at the next time point with an accuracy of 82.6%. Our results suggest that PROs and CAOs could help the clinician decision-making in their practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7005074 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70050742020-02-25 The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach Brichetto, Giampaolo Monti Bragadin, Margherita Fiorini, Samuele Battaglia, Mario Alberto Konrad, Giovanna Ponzio, Michela Pedullà, Ludovico Verri, Alessandro Barla, Annalisa Tacchino, Andrea Neurol Sci Brief Communication Machine learning (ML) applied to patient-reported (PROs) and clinical-assessed outcomes (CAOs) could favour a more predictive and personalized medicine. Our aim was to confirm the important role of applying ML to PROs and CAOs of people with relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) form of multiple sclerosis (MS), to promptly identifying information useful to predict disease progression. For our analysis, a dataset of 3398 evaluations from 810 persons with MS (PwMS) was adopted. Three steps were provided: course classification; extraction of the most relevant predictors at the next time point; prediction if the patient will experience the transition from RR to SP at the next time point. The Current Course Assignment (CCA) step correctly assigned the current MS course with an accuracy of about 86.0%. The MS course at the next time point can be predicted using the predictors selected in CCA. PROs/CAOs Evolution Prediction (PEP) followed by Future Course Assignment (FCA) was able to foresee the course at the next time point with an accuracy of 82.6%. Our results suggest that PROs and CAOs could help the clinician decision-making in their practice. Springer International Publishing 2019-10-28 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7005074/ /pubmed/31659583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04093-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Brichetto, Giampaolo Monti Bragadin, Margherita Fiorini, Samuele Battaglia, Mario Alberto Konrad, Giovanna Ponzio, Michela Pedullà, Ludovico Verri, Alessandro Barla, Annalisa Tacchino, Andrea The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach |
title | The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach |
title_full | The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach |
title_fullStr | The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach |
title_full_unstemmed | The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach |
title_short | The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach |
title_sort | hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7005074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31659583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04093-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brichettogiampaolo thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT montibragadinmargherita thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT fiorinisamuele thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT battagliamarioalberto thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT konradgiovanna thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT ponziomichela thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT pedullaludovico thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT verrialessandro thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT barlaannalisa thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT tacchinoandrea thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT brichettogiampaolo hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT montibragadinmargherita hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT fiorinisamuele hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT battagliamarioalberto hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT konradgiovanna hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT ponziomichela hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT pedullaludovico hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT verrialessandro hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT barlaannalisa hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach AT tacchinoandrea hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach |