Cargando…

The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach

Machine learning (ML) applied to patient-reported (PROs) and clinical-assessed outcomes (CAOs) could favour a more predictive and personalized medicine. Our aim was to confirm the important role of applying ML to PROs and CAOs of people with relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brichetto, Giampaolo, Monti Bragadin, Margherita, Fiorini, Samuele, Battaglia, Mario Alberto, Konrad, Giovanna, Ponzio, Michela, Pedullà, Ludovico, Verri, Alessandro, Barla, Annalisa, Tacchino, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7005074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31659583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04093-x
_version_ 1783494855305986048
author Brichetto, Giampaolo
Monti Bragadin, Margherita
Fiorini, Samuele
Battaglia, Mario Alberto
Konrad, Giovanna
Ponzio, Michela
Pedullà, Ludovico
Verri, Alessandro
Barla, Annalisa
Tacchino, Andrea
author_facet Brichetto, Giampaolo
Monti Bragadin, Margherita
Fiorini, Samuele
Battaglia, Mario Alberto
Konrad, Giovanna
Ponzio, Michela
Pedullà, Ludovico
Verri, Alessandro
Barla, Annalisa
Tacchino, Andrea
author_sort Brichetto, Giampaolo
collection PubMed
description Machine learning (ML) applied to patient-reported (PROs) and clinical-assessed outcomes (CAOs) could favour a more predictive and personalized medicine. Our aim was to confirm the important role of applying ML to PROs and CAOs of people with relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) form of multiple sclerosis (MS), to promptly identifying information useful to predict disease progression. For our analysis, a dataset of 3398 evaluations from 810 persons with MS (PwMS) was adopted. Three steps were provided: course classification; extraction of the most relevant predictors at the next time point; prediction if the patient will experience the transition from RR to SP at the next time point. The Current Course Assignment (CCA) step correctly assigned the current MS course with an accuracy of about 86.0%. The MS course at the next time point can be predicted using the predictors selected in CCA. PROs/CAOs Evolution Prediction (PEP) followed by Future Course Assignment (FCA) was able to foresee the course at the next time point with an accuracy of 82.6%. Our results suggest that PROs and CAOs could help the clinician decision-making in their practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7005074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70050742020-02-25 The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach Brichetto, Giampaolo Monti Bragadin, Margherita Fiorini, Samuele Battaglia, Mario Alberto Konrad, Giovanna Ponzio, Michela Pedullà, Ludovico Verri, Alessandro Barla, Annalisa Tacchino, Andrea Neurol Sci Brief Communication Machine learning (ML) applied to patient-reported (PROs) and clinical-assessed outcomes (CAOs) could favour a more predictive and personalized medicine. Our aim was to confirm the important role of applying ML to PROs and CAOs of people with relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) form of multiple sclerosis (MS), to promptly identifying information useful to predict disease progression. For our analysis, a dataset of 3398 evaluations from 810 persons with MS (PwMS) was adopted. Three steps were provided: course classification; extraction of the most relevant predictors at the next time point; prediction if the patient will experience the transition from RR to SP at the next time point. The Current Course Assignment (CCA) step correctly assigned the current MS course with an accuracy of about 86.0%. The MS course at the next time point can be predicted using the predictors selected in CCA. PROs/CAOs Evolution Prediction (PEP) followed by Future Course Assignment (FCA) was able to foresee the course at the next time point with an accuracy of 82.6%. Our results suggest that PROs and CAOs could help the clinician decision-making in their practice. Springer International Publishing 2019-10-28 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7005074/ /pubmed/31659583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04093-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Brichetto, Giampaolo
Monti Bragadin, Margherita
Fiorini, Samuele
Battaglia, Mario Alberto
Konrad, Giovanna
Ponzio, Michela
Pedullà, Ludovico
Verri, Alessandro
Barla, Annalisa
Tacchino, Andrea
The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach
title The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach
title_full The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach
title_fullStr The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach
title_full_unstemmed The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach
title_short The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach
title_sort hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7005074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31659583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04093-x
work_keys_str_mv AT brichettogiampaolo thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT montibragadinmargherita thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT fiorinisamuele thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT battagliamarioalberto thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT konradgiovanna thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT ponziomichela thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT pedullaludovico thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT verrialessandro thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT barlaannalisa thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT tacchinoandrea thehiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT brichettogiampaolo hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT montibragadinmargherita hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT fiorinisamuele hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT battagliamarioalberto hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT konradgiovanna hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT ponziomichela hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT pedullaludovico hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT verrialessandro hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT barlaannalisa hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach
AT tacchinoandrea hiddeninformationinpatientreportedoutcomesandclinicianassessedoutcomesmultiplesclerosisasaproofofconceptofamachinelearningapproach