Cargando…

Probing lncRNA–Protein Interactions: Data Repositories, Models, and Algorithms

Identifying lncRNA–protein interactions (LPIs) is vital to understanding various key biological processes. Wet experiments found a few LPIs, but experimental methods are costly and time-consuming. Therefore, computational methods are increasingly exploited to capture LPI candidates. We introduced re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Lihong, Liu, Fuxing, Yang, Jialiang, Liu, Xiaojun, Meng, Yajie, Deng, Xiaojun, Peng, Cheng, Tian, Geng, Zhou, Liqian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7005249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32082358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01346
_version_ 1783494894806892544
author Peng, Lihong
Liu, Fuxing
Yang, Jialiang
Liu, Xiaojun
Meng, Yajie
Deng, Xiaojun
Peng, Cheng
Tian, Geng
Zhou, Liqian
author_facet Peng, Lihong
Liu, Fuxing
Yang, Jialiang
Liu, Xiaojun
Meng, Yajie
Deng, Xiaojun
Peng, Cheng
Tian, Geng
Zhou, Liqian
author_sort Peng, Lihong
collection PubMed
description Identifying lncRNA–protein interactions (LPIs) is vital to understanding various key biological processes. Wet experiments found a few LPIs, but experimental methods are costly and time-consuming. Therefore, computational methods are increasingly exploited to capture LPI candidates. We introduced relevant data repositories, focused on two types of LPI prediction models: network-based methods and machine learning-based methods. Machine learning-based methods contain matrix factorization-based techniques and ensemble learning-based techniques. To detect the performance of computational methods, we compared parts of LPI prediction models on Leave-One-Out cross-validation (LOOCV) and fivefold cross-validation. The results show that SFPEL-LPI obtained the best performance of AUC. Although computational models have efficiently unraveled some LPI candidates, there are many limitations involved. We discussed future directions to further boost LPI predictive performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7005249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70052492020-02-20 Probing lncRNA–Protein Interactions: Data Repositories, Models, and Algorithms Peng, Lihong Liu, Fuxing Yang, Jialiang Liu, Xiaojun Meng, Yajie Deng, Xiaojun Peng, Cheng Tian, Geng Zhou, Liqian Front Genet Genetics Identifying lncRNA–protein interactions (LPIs) is vital to understanding various key biological processes. Wet experiments found a few LPIs, but experimental methods are costly and time-consuming. Therefore, computational methods are increasingly exploited to capture LPI candidates. We introduced relevant data repositories, focused on two types of LPI prediction models: network-based methods and machine learning-based methods. Machine learning-based methods contain matrix factorization-based techniques and ensemble learning-based techniques. To detect the performance of computational methods, we compared parts of LPI prediction models on Leave-One-Out cross-validation (LOOCV) and fivefold cross-validation. The results show that SFPEL-LPI obtained the best performance of AUC. Although computational models have efficiently unraveled some LPI candidates, there are many limitations involved. We discussed future directions to further boost LPI predictive performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7005249/ /pubmed/32082358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01346 Text en Copyright © 2020 Peng, Liu, Yang, Liu, Meng, Deng, Peng, Tian and Zhou http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Peng, Lihong
Liu, Fuxing
Yang, Jialiang
Liu, Xiaojun
Meng, Yajie
Deng, Xiaojun
Peng, Cheng
Tian, Geng
Zhou, Liqian
Probing lncRNA–Protein Interactions: Data Repositories, Models, and Algorithms
title Probing lncRNA–Protein Interactions: Data Repositories, Models, and Algorithms
title_full Probing lncRNA–Protein Interactions: Data Repositories, Models, and Algorithms
title_fullStr Probing lncRNA–Protein Interactions: Data Repositories, Models, and Algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Probing lncRNA–Protein Interactions: Data Repositories, Models, and Algorithms
title_short Probing lncRNA–Protein Interactions: Data Repositories, Models, and Algorithms
title_sort probing lncrna–protein interactions: data repositories, models, and algorithms
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7005249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32082358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01346
work_keys_str_mv AT penglihong probinglncrnaproteininteractionsdatarepositoriesmodelsandalgorithms
AT liufuxing probinglncrnaproteininteractionsdatarepositoriesmodelsandalgorithms
AT yangjialiang probinglncrnaproteininteractionsdatarepositoriesmodelsandalgorithms
AT liuxiaojun probinglncrnaproteininteractionsdatarepositoriesmodelsandalgorithms
AT mengyajie probinglncrnaproteininteractionsdatarepositoriesmodelsandalgorithms
AT dengxiaojun probinglncrnaproteininteractionsdatarepositoriesmodelsandalgorithms
AT pengcheng probinglncrnaproteininteractionsdatarepositoriesmodelsandalgorithms
AT tiangeng probinglncrnaproteininteractionsdatarepositoriesmodelsandalgorithms
AT zhouliqian probinglncrnaproteininteractionsdatarepositoriesmodelsandalgorithms