Cargando…
Probing lncRNA–Protein Interactions: Data Repositories, Models, and Algorithms
Identifying lncRNA–protein interactions (LPIs) is vital to understanding various key biological processes. Wet experiments found a few LPIs, but experimental methods are costly and time-consuming. Therefore, computational methods are increasingly exploited to capture LPI candidates. We introduced re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7005249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32082358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01346 |
_version_ | 1783494894806892544 |
---|---|
author | Peng, Lihong Liu, Fuxing Yang, Jialiang Liu, Xiaojun Meng, Yajie Deng, Xiaojun Peng, Cheng Tian, Geng Zhou, Liqian |
author_facet | Peng, Lihong Liu, Fuxing Yang, Jialiang Liu, Xiaojun Meng, Yajie Deng, Xiaojun Peng, Cheng Tian, Geng Zhou, Liqian |
author_sort | Peng, Lihong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Identifying lncRNA–protein interactions (LPIs) is vital to understanding various key biological processes. Wet experiments found a few LPIs, but experimental methods are costly and time-consuming. Therefore, computational methods are increasingly exploited to capture LPI candidates. We introduced relevant data repositories, focused on two types of LPI prediction models: network-based methods and machine learning-based methods. Machine learning-based methods contain matrix factorization-based techniques and ensemble learning-based techniques. To detect the performance of computational methods, we compared parts of LPI prediction models on Leave-One-Out cross-validation (LOOCV) and fivefold cross-validation. The results show that SFPEL-LPI obtained the best performance of AUC. Although computational models have efficiently unraveled some LPI candidates, there are many limitations involved. We discussed future directions to further boost LPI predictive performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7005249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70052492020-02-20 Probing lncRNA–Protein Interactions: Data Repositories, Models, and Algorithms Peng, Lihong Liu, Fuxing Yang, Jialiang Liu, Xiaojun Meng, Yajie Deng, Xiaojun Peng, Cheng Tian, Geng Zhou, Liqian Front Genet Genetics Identifying lncRNA–protein interactions (LPIs) is vital to understanding various key biological processes. Wet experiments found a few LPIs, but experimental methods are costly and time-consuming. Therefore, computational methods are increasingly exploited to capture LPI candidates. We introduced relevant data repositories, focused on two types of LPI prediction models: network-based methods and machine learning-based methods. Machine learning-based methods contain matrix factorization-based techniques and ensemble learning-based techniques. To detect the performance of computational methods, we compared parts of LPI prediction models on Leave-One-Out cross-validation (LOOCV) and fivefold cross-validation. The results show that SFPEL-LPI obtained the best performance of AUC. Although computational models have efficiently unraveled some LPI candidates, there are many limitations involved. We discussed future directions to further boost LPI predictive performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7005249/ /pubmed/32082358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01346 Text en Copyright © 2020 Peng, Liu, Yang, Liu, Meng, Deng, Peng, Tian and Zhou http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Peng, Lihong Liu, Fuxing Yang, Jialiang Liu, Xiaojun Meng, Yajie Deng, Xiaojun Peng, Cheng Tian, Geng Zhou, Liqian Probing lncRNA–Protein Interactions: Data Repositories, Models, and Algorithms |
title | Probing lncRNA–Protein Interactions: Data Repositories, Models, and Algorithms |
title_full | Probing lncRNA–Protein Interactions: Data Repositories, Models, and Algorithms |
title_fullStr | Probing lncRNA–Protein Interactions: Data Repositories, Models, and Algorithms |
title_full_unstemmed | Probing lncRNA–Protein Interactions: Data Repositories, Models, and Algorithms |
title_short | Probing lncRNA–Protein Interactions: Data Repositories, Models, and Algorithms |
title_sort | probing lncrna–protein interactions: data repositories, models, and algorithms |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7005249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32082358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01346 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT penglihong probinglncrnaproteininteractionsdatarepositoriesmodelsandalgorithms AT liufuxing probinglncrnaproteininteractionsdatarepositoriesmodelsandalgorithms AT yangjialiang probinglncrnaproteininteractionsdatarepositoriesmodelsandalgorithms AT liuxiaojun probinglncrnaproteininteractionsdatarepositoriesmodelsandalgorithms AT mengyajie probinglncrnaproteininteractionsdatarepositoriesmodelsandalgorithms AT dengxiaojun probinglncrnaproteininteractionsdatarepositoriesmodelsandalgorithms AT pengcheng probinglncrnaproteininteractionsdatarepositoriesmodelsandalgorithms AT tiangeng probinglncrnaproteininteractionsdatarepositoriesmodelsandalgorithms AT zhouliqian probinglncrnaproteininteractionsdatarepositoriesmodelsandalgorithms |