Cargando…

Development and usability testing of a very brief intervention for personalised cancer risk assessment to promote behaviour change in primary care using normalisation process theory

BACKGROUND: Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Lifestyle choices play an important role in the aetiology of cancer with up to 4 in 10 cases potentially preventable. Interventions delivered by healthcare professionals (HCPs) that incorporate risk information have the potential to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mills, Katie, Griffin, Simon J., Sutton, Stephen, Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7005588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31934843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S146342361900080X
_version_ 1783494968372887552
author Mills, Katie
Griffin, Simon J.
Sutton, Stephen
Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
author_facet Mills, Katie
Griffin, Simon J.
Sutton, Stephen
Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
author_sort Mills, Katie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Lifestyle choices play an important role in the aetiology of cancer with up to 4 in 10 cases potentially preventable. Interventions delivered by healthcare professionals (HCPs) that incorporate risk information have the potential to promote behaviour change. Our aim was to develop a very brief intervention incorporating cancer risk, which could be implemented within primary care. METHODS: Guided by normalisation process theory (NPT), we developed a prototype intervention using literature reviews, consultation with patient and public representatives and pilot work with patients and HCPs. We conducted focus groups and interviews with 65 HCPs involved in delivering prevention activities. Findings were used to refine the intervention before 22 HCPs completed an online usability test and provided further feedback via a questionnaire incorporating a modified version of the NoMAD checklist. RESULTS: The intervention included a website where individuals could provide information on lifestyle risk factors view their estimated 10-year risk of developing one or more of the five most common preventable cancers and access lifestyle advice incorporating behaviour change techniques. Changes incorporated from feedback from the focus groups and interviews included signposting to local services and websites, simplified wording and labelling of risk information. In the usability testing, all participants felt it would be easy to collect the risk information. Ninety-one percent felt the intervention would enable discussion about cancer risk and believed it had potential to be easily integrated into National Health Service (NHS) Health Checks. However, only 36% agreed it could be delivered within 5 min. CONCLUSIONS: With the use of NPT, we developed a very brief intervention that is acceptable to HCPs in primary care and could be potentially integrated into NHS Health Checks. However, further work is needed to assess its feasibility and potential effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7005588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70055882020-02-20 Development and usability testing of a very brief intervention for personalised cancer risk assessment to promote behaviour change in primary care using normalisation process theory Mills, Katie Griffin, Simon J. Sutton, Stephen Usher-Smith, Juliet A. Prim Health Care Res Dev Development BACKGROUND: Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Lifestyle choices play an important role in the aetiology of cancer with up to 4 in 10 cases potentially preventable. Interventions delivered by healthcare professionals (HCPs) that incorporate risk information have the potential to promote behaviour change. Our aim was to develop a very brief intervention incorporating cancer risk, which could be implemented within primary care. METHODS: Guided by normalisation process theory (NPT), we developed a prototype intervention using literature reviews, consultation with patient and public representatives and pilot work with patients and HCPs. We conducted focus groups and interviews with 65 HCPs involved in delivering prevention activities. Findings were used to refine the intervention before 22 HCPs completed an online usability test and provided further feedback via a questionnaire incorporating a modified version of the NoMAD checklist. RESULTS: The intervention included a website where individuals could provide information on lifestyle risk factors view their estimated 10-year risk of developing one or more of the five most common preventable cancers and access lifestyle advice incorporating behaviour change techniques. Changes incorporated from feedback from the focus groups and interviews included signposting to local services and websites, simplified wording and labelling of risk information. In the usability testing, all participants felt it would be easy to collect the risk information. Ninety-one percent felt the intervention would enable discussion about cancer risk and believed it had potential to be easily integrated into National Health Service (NHS) Health Checks. However, only 36% agreed it could be delivered within 5 min. CONCLUSIONS: With the use of NPT, we developed a very brief intervention that is acceptable to HCPs in primary care and could be potentially integrated into NHS Health Checks. However, further work is needed to assess its feasibility and potential effectiveness. Cambridge University Press 2020-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7005588/ /pubmed/31934843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S146342361900080X Text en © Cambridge University Press 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Development
Mills, Katie
Griffin, Simon J.
Sutton, Stephen
Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
Development and usability testing of a very brief intervention for personalised cancer risk assessment to promote behaviour change in primary care using normalisation process theory
title Development and usability testing of a very brief intervention for personalised cancer risk assessment to promote behaviour change in primary care using normalisation process theory
title_full Development and usability testing of a very brief intervention for personalised cancer risk assessment to promote behaviour change in primary care using normalisation process theory
title_fullStr Development and usability testing of a very brief intervention for personalised cancer risk assessment to promote behaviour change in primary care using normalisation process theory
title_full_unstemmed Development and usability testing of a very brief intervention for personalised cancer risk assessment to promote behaviour change in primary care using normalisation process theory
title_short Development and usability testing of a very brief intervention for personalised cancer risk assessment to promote behaviour change in primary care using normalisation process theory
title_sort development and usability testing of a very brief intervention for personalised cancer risk assessment to promote behaviour change in primary care using normalisation process theory
topic Development
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7005588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31934843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S146342361900080X
work_keys_str_mv AT millskatie developmentandusabilitytestingofaverybriefinterventionforpersonalisedcancerriskassessmenttopromotebehaviourchangeinprimarycareusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT griffinsimonj developmentandusabilitytestingofaverybriefinterventionforpersonalisedcancerriskassessmenttopromotebehaviourchangeinprimarycareusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT suttonstephen developmentandusabilitytestingofaverybriefinterventionforpersonalisedcancerriskassessmenttopromotebehaviourchangeinprimarycareusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT ushersmithjulieta developmentandusabilitytestingofaverybriefinterventionforpersonalisedcancerriskassessmenttopromotebehaviourchangeinprimarycareusingnormalisationprocesstheory