Cargando…

Deep Learning vs. Radiomics for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis of Breast Cancer Using Ultrasound Images: Don't Forget the Peritumoral Region

Objective: Axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis status is important in guiding treatment in breast cancer. The aims were to assess how deep convolutional neural network (CNN) performed compared with radiomics analysis in predicting ALN metastasis using breast ultrasound, and to investigate the value...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Qiuchang, Lin, Xiaona, Zhao, Yuanshen, Li, Ling, Yan, Kai, Liang, Dong, Sun, Desheng, Li, Zhi-Cheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32083007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00053
_version_ 1783495057112825856
author Sun, Qiuchang
Lin, Xiaona
Zhao, Yuanshen
Li, Ling
Yan, Kai
Liang, Dong
Sun, Desheng
Li, Zhi-Cheng
author_facet Sun, Qiuchang
Lin, Xiaona
Zhao, Yuanshen
Li, Ling
Yan, Kai
Liang, Dong
Sun, Desheng
Li, Zhi-Cheng
author_sort Sun, Qiuchang
collection PubMed
description Objective: Axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis status is important in guiding treatment in breast cancer. The aims were to assess how deep convolutional neural network (CNN) performed compared with radiomics analysis in predicting ALN metastasis using breast ultrasound, and to investigate the value of both intratumoral and peritumoral regions in ALN metastasis prediction. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 479 breast cancer patients with 2,395 breast ultrasound images. Based on the intratumoral, peritumoral, and combined intra- and peritumoral regions, three CNNs were built using DenseNet, and three radiomics models were built using random forest, respectively. By combining the molecular subtype, another three CNNs and three radiomics models were built. All models were built on training cohort (343 patients 1,715 images) and evaluated on testing cohort (136 patients 680 images) with ROC analysis. Another prospective cohort of 16 patients was enrolled to further test the models. Results: AUCs of image-only CNNs in both training/testing cohorts were 0.957/0.912 for combined region, 0.944/0.775 for peritumoral region, and 0.937/0.748 for intratumoral region, which were numerically higher than their corresponding radiomics models with AUCs of 0.940/0.886, 0.920/0.724, and 0.913/0.693. The overall performance of image-molecular CNNs in terms of AUCs on training/testing cohorts slightly increased to 0.962/0.933, 0.951/0.813, and 0.931/0.794, respectively. AUCs of both CNNs and radiomics models built on combined region were significantly better than those on either intratumoral or peritumoral region on the testing cohort (p < 0.05). In the prospective study, the CNN model built on combined region achieved the highest AUC of 0.95 among all image-only models. Conclusions: CNNs showed numerically better overall performance compared with radiomics models in predicting ALN metastasis in breast cancer. For both CNNs and radiomics models, combining intratumoral, and peritumoral regions achieved significantly better performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7006026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70060262020-02-20 Deep Learning vs. Radiomics for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis of Breast Cancer Using Ultrasound Images: Don't Forget the Peritumoral Region Sun, Qiuchang Lin, Xiaona Zhao, Yuanshen Li, Ling Yan, Kai Liang, Dong Sun, Desheng Li, Zhi-Cheng Front Oncol Oncology Objective: Axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis status is important in guiding treatment in breast cancer. The aims were to assess how deep convolutional neural network (CNN) performed compared with radiomics analysis in predicting ALN metastasis using breast ultrasound, and to investigate the value of both intratumoral and peritumoral regions in ALN metastasis prediction. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 479 breast cancer patients with 2,395 breast ultrasound images. Based on the intratumoral, peritumoral, and combined intra- and peritumoral regions, three CNNs were built using DenseNet, and three radiomics models were built using random forest, respectively. By combining the molecular subtype, another three CNNs and three radiomics models were built. All models were built on training cohort (343 patients 1,715 images) and evaluated on testing cohort (136 patients 680 images) with ROC analysis. Another prospective cohort of 16 patients was enrolled to further test the models. Results: AUCs of image-only CNNs in both training/testing cohorts were 0.957/0.912 for combined region, 0.944/0.775 for peritumoral region, and 0.937/0.748 for intratumoral region, which were numerically higher than their corresponding radiomics models with AUCs of 0.940/0.886, 0.920/0.724, and 0.913/0.693. The overall performance of image-molecular CNNs in terms of AUCs on training/testing cohorts slightly increased to 0.962/0.933, 0.951/0.813, and 0.931/0.794, respectively. AUCs of both CNNs and radiomics models built on combined region were significantly better than those on either intratumoral or peritumoral region on the testing cohort (p < 0.05). In the prospective study, the CNN model built on combined region achieved the highest AUC of 0.95 among all image-only models. Conclusions: CNNs showed numerically better overall performance compared with radiomics models in predicting ALN metastasis in breast cancer. For both CNNs and radiomics models, combining intratumoral, and peritumoral regions achieved significantly better performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7006026/ /pubmed/32083007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00053 Text en Copyright © 2020 Sun, Lin, Zhao, Li, Yan, Liang, Sun and Li. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Sun, Qiuchang
Lin, Xiaona
Zhao, Yuanshen
Li, Ling
Yan, Kai
Liang, Dong
Sun, Desheng
Li, Zhi-Cheng
Deep Learning vs. Radiomics for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis of Breast Cancer Using Ultrasound Images: Don't Forget the Peritumoral Region
title Deep Learning vs. Radiomics for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis of Breast Cancer Using Ultrasound Images: Don't Forget the Peritumoral Region
title_full Deep Learning vs. Radiomics for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis of Breast Cancer Using Ultrasound Images: Don't Forget the Peritumoral Region
title_fullStr Deep Learning vs. Radiomics for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis of Breast Cancer Using Ultrasound Images: Don't Forget the Peritumoral Region
title_full_unstemmed Deep Learning vs. Radiomics for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis of Breast Cancer Using Ultrasound Images: Don't Forget the Peritumoral Region
title_short Deep Learning vs. Radiomics for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis of Breast Cancer Using Ultrasound Images: Don't Forget the Peritumoral Region
title_sort deep learning vs. radiomics for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis of breast cancer using ultrasound images: don't forget the peritumoral region
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32083007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00053
work_keys_str_mv AT sunqiuchang deeplearningvsradiomicsforpredictingaxillarylymphnodemetastasisofbreastcancerusingultrasoundimagesdontforgettheperitumoralregion
AT linxiaona deeplearningvsradiomicsforpredictingaxillarylymphnodemetastasisofbreastcancerusingultrasoundimagesdontforgettheperitumoralregion
AT zhaoyuanshen deeplearningvsradiomicsforpredictingaxillarylymphnodemetastasisofbreastcancerusingultrasoundimagesdontforgettheperitumoralregion
AT liling deeplearningvsradiomicsforpredictingaxillarylymphnodemetastasisofbreastcancerusingultrasoundimagesdontforgettheperitumoralregion
AT yankai deeplearningvsradiomicsforpredictingaxillarylymphnodemetastasisofbreastcancerusingultrasoundimagesdontforgettheperitumoralregion
AT liangdong deeplearningvsradiomicsforpredictingaxillarylymphnodemetastasisofbreastcancerusingultrasoundimagesdontforgettheperitumoralregion
AT sundesheng deeplearningvsradiomicsforpredictingaxillarylymphnodemetastasisofbreastcancerusingultrasoundimagesdontforgettheperitumoralregion
AT lizhicheng deeplearningvsradiomicsforpredictingaxillarylymphnodemetastasisofbreastcancerusingultrasoundimagesdontforgettheperitumoralregion