Cargando…

Induction of labour in nulliparous women- quick or slow: a cohort study comparing slow-release vaginal insert with low-dose misoprostol oral tablets

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken with the objective of comparing efficacy and safety for two different regimens using misoprostol for induction of labour. METHODS: The study was set in two different hospitals in the region of Zeeland, Denmark, and designed as a prospective cohort study. Nullipa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Eriksson, Axelina, Jeppesen, Sarah, Krebs, Lone
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2020
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32033600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2770-0

Ejemplares similares

Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study
por: Bolla, Daniele, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study
por: Marsdal, Kjersti Engen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Misoprostol vs dinoprostone vaginal insert in labour induction: comparison of obstetrical outcome
por: Mlodawski, Jakub, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction
por: Noor, Nasreen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Slow, slow, slow, quick quick, slow
Publicado: (1976)

Comparison of Misoprostol and Dinoprostone for elective induction of labour in nulliparous women at full term: A randomized prospective study
por: Papanikolaou, Evangelos G, et al.
Publicado: (2004)

Outcome of misoprostol and oxytocin in induction of labour
por: Acharya, Trishna, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Reduction in resource use with the misoprostol vaginal insert vs the dinoprostone vaginal insert for labour induction: a model-based analysis from a United Kingdom healthcare perspective
por: Draycott, T., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Simplifying oral misoprostol protocols for the induction of labour
por: Weeks, AD, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The Efficacy of Misoprostol Vaginal Inserts for Induction of Labor in Women with Very Unfavorable Cervices
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Induction of Labor at Term with Oral Misoprostol or as a Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert – A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
por: Beyer, Jana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Is Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Safe for the Induction of Labor in High-Risk Pregnancy Obese Women?
por: Varlas, Valentin Nicolae, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial
por: Young, David C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Efficacy and safety of oral and sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Pergialiotis, Vasilios, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Clinical experience with misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a prospective clinical observational study
por: Schmidt, Markus, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Term induction of labour in nulliparous women: When to draw the line?
por: Mitchell, Jill M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
por: Lapuente-Ocamica, O., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Outcome of Induction of Labour in Nulliparous Women Following Replacement of Cervidil with Prostin
por: Basu, Abhijit, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Induction of labour with sequential double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone in obese women
por: Kehl, Sven, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Labour Induction with Misoprostol in German Obstetric Clinics: What Are the Facts on Such Use?
por: Kehl, Sven, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A critical appraisal of the misoprostol removable, controlled-release vaginal delivery system of labor induction
por: Patte, Charlotte, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term
por: Vorontsova, Yana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The slow decay and quick revival of self-deception
por: Chance, Zoë, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Role of Combination OF Mifepristone and Misoprostol Verses Misoprostol alone in Induction of Labour in Late Intrauterin Fetal Death: A Prospective Study
por: Panda, Subrat, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Comparison of Intracervical Foley’s Catheter With Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Kadu, Nivedita A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Vahid Roudsari, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Slow, slow, quick, quick, slow: five altmetric sources observed over a decade show evolving trends, by research age, attention source maturity and open access status
por: Taylor, Michael
Publicado: (2023)

Intravaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction in Nulliparous Women: A Double-blinded, Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
por: Zhang, Yu, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Effects of Misoprostol on Induction of Labour in Patients with Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis
por: Wang, Leilei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Induction of Labour with the Propess Vaginal System to the Prostin Vaginal Tablet in Premature Rupture of Membranes at Term
por: Anzeljc, Veronika, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effect of extra-amniotic Foley’s catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial
por: Osoti, Alfred, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Retracted: Effects of Misoprostol on Induction of Labour in Patients with Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis
por: Healthcare Engineering, Journal of
Publicado: (2023)

Effect of vaginal washing before Misoprostol insertion on cervical ripening before induction of labor: A randomized single‐blind clinical trial
por: Kabodmehri, Roya, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Induction with Foley OR Misoprostol (INFORM) Study dataset. A dataset of 602 women with hypertensive disease in pregnancy, in India, randomised to either Foley catheter or oral misoprostol for induction of labour
por: Mundle, Shuchita, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Induction of labour with retrievable prostaglandin vaginal inserts: outcomes following retrieval due to an intrapartum adverse event
por: Rugarn, O, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Oral Misoprostol alone versus oral misoprostol followed by oxytocin for labour induction in women with hypertension in pregnancy (MOLI): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Bracken, Hillary, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Tentative T Cells: Memory Cells Are Quick to Respond, but Slow to Divide
por: Whitmire, Jason K., et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Physiological Environment Induces Quick Response – Slow Exhaustion Reactions
por: Hiroi, Noriko, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Increased Bioavailability of β-Alanine by a Novel Controlled-Release Powder Blend Compared to a Slow-Release Tablet
por: de Salazar, Lydia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Effect of filtration on morphine and particle content of injections prepared from slow-release oral morphine tablets
por: McLean, Stuart, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_a3jc9m6f9cui9vbqhilf3p8h2r