Cargando…
Are scurs in heterozygous polled (Pp) cattle a complex quantitative trait?
BACKGROUND: Breeding genetically hornless, i.e. polled, cattle provides an animal welfare-friendly and non-invasive alternative to the dehorning of calves. However, the molecular regulation of the development of horns in cattle is still poorly understood. Studying genetic characters such as polledne...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32033534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-020-0525-z |
_version_ | 1783495072172474368 |
---|---|
author | Gehrke, Lilian Johanna Capitan, Aurélien Scheper, Carsten König, Sven Upadhyay, Maulik Heidrich, Kristin Russ, Ingolf Seichter, Doris Tetens, Jens Medugorac, Ivica Thaller, Georg |
author_facet | Gehrke, Lilian Johanna Capitan, Aurélien Scheper, Carsten König, Sven Upadhyay, Maulik Heidrich, Kristin Russ, Ingolf Seichter, Doris Tetens, Jens Medugorac, Ivica Thaller, Georg |
author_sort | Gehrke, Lilian Johanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Breeding genetically hornless, i.e. polled, cattle provides an animal welfare-friendly and non-invasive alternative to the dehorning of calves. However, the molecular regulation of the development of horns in cattle is still poorly understood. Studying genetic characters such as polledness and scurs, can provide valuable insights into this process. Scurs are hornlike formations that occur occasionally in a wide variety of sizes and forms as an unexpected phenotype when breeding polled cattle. METHODS: We present a unique dataset of 885 Holstein–Friesian cattle with polled parentage. The horn phenotype was carefully examined, and the phenotypic heterogeneity of the trait is described. Using a direct gene test for polledness, the polled genotype of the animals was determined. Subsequently, the existence of a putative scurs locus was investigated using high-density genotype data of a selected subset of 232 animals and two mapping approaches: mixed linear model-based association analyses and combined linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis. RESULTS: The results of an exploratory data analysis indicated that the expression of scurs depends on age at phenotyping, sex and polled genotype. Scurs were more prevalent in males than in females. Moreover, homozygous polled animals did not express any pronounced scurs and we found that the Friesian polled allele suppresses the development of scurs more efficiently than the Celtic polled allele. Combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping revealed four genome-wide significant loci that affect the development of scurs, one on BTA5 and three on BTA12. Moreover, suggestive associations were detected on BTA16, 18 and 23. The mixed linear model-based association analysis supports the results of the combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium analysis. None of the mapping approaches provided convincing evidence for a monogenic inheritance of scurs. CONCLUSIONS: Our results contradict the initial and still broadly accepted model for the inheritance of horns and scurs. We hypothesise an oligogenetic model to explain the development of scurs and polledness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7006098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70060982020-02-11 Are scurs in heterozygous polled (Pp) cattle a complex quantitative trait? Gehrke, Lilian Johanna Capitan, Aurélien Scheper, Carsten König, Sven Upadhyay, Maulik Heidrich, Kristin Russ, Ingolf Seichter, Doris Tetens, Jens Medugorac, Ivica Thaller, Georg Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: Breeding genetically hornless, i.e. polled, cattle provides an animal welfare-friendly and non-invasive alternative to the dehorning of calves. However, the molecular regulation of the development of horns in cattle is still poorly understood. Studying genetic characters such as polledness and scurs, can provide valuable insights into this process. Scurs are hornlike formations that occur occasionally in a wide variety of sizes and forms as an unexpected phenotype when breeding polled cattle. METHODS: We present a unique dataset of 885 Holstein–Friesian cattle with polled parentage. The horn phenotype was carefully examined, and the phenotypic heterogeneity of the trait is described. Using a direct gene test for polledness, the polled genotype of the animals was determined. Subsequently, the existence of a putative scurs locus was investigated using high-density genotype data of a selected subset of 232 animals and two mapping approaches: mixed linear model-based association analyses and combined linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis. RESULTS: The results of an exploratory data analysis indicated that the expression of scurs depends on age at phenotyping, sex and polled genotype. Scurs were more prevalent in males than in females. Moreover, homozygous polled animals did not express any pronounced scurs and we found that the Friesian polled allele suppresses the development of scurs more efficiently than the Celtic polled allele. Combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping revealed four genome-wide significant loci that affect the development of scurs, one on BTA5 and three on BTA12. Moreover, suggestive associations were detected on BTA16, 18 and 23. The mixed linear model-based association analysis supports the results of the combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium analysis. None of the mapping approaches provided convincing evidence for a monogenic inheritance of scurs. CONCLUSIONS: Our results contradict the initial and still broadly accepted model for the inheritance of horns and scurs. We hypothesise an oligogenetic model to explain the development of scurs and polledness. BioMed Central 2020-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7006098/ /pubmed/32033534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-020-0525-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gehrke, Lilian Johanna Capitan, Aurélien Scheper, Carsten König, Sven Upadhyay, Maulik Heidrich, Kristin Russ, Ingolf Seichter, Doris Tetens, Jens Medugorac, Ivica Thaller, Georg Are scurs in heterozygous polled (Pp) cattle a complex quantitative trait? |
title | Are scurs in heterozygous polled (Pp) cattle a complex quantitative trait? |
title_full | Are scurs in heterozygous polled (Pp) cattle a complex quantitative trait? |
title_fullStr | Are scurs in heterozygous polled (Pp) cattle a complex quantitative trait? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are scurs in heterozygous polled (Pp) cattle a complex quantitative trait? |
title_short | Are scurs in heterozygous polled (Pp) cattle a complex quantitative trait? |
title_sort | are scurs in heterozygous polled (pp) cattle a complex quantitative trait? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32033534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-020-0525-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gehrkelilianjohanna arescursinheterozygouspolledppcattleacomplexquantitativetrait AT capitanaurelien arescursinheterozygouspolledppcattleacomplexquantitativetrait AT schepercarsten arescursinheterozygouspolledppcattleacomplexquantitativetrait AT konigsven arescursinheterozygouspolledppcattleacomplexquantitativetrait AT upadhyaymaulik arescursinheterozygouspolledppcattleacomplexquantitativetrait AT heidrichkristin arescursinheterozygouspolledppcattleacomplexquantitativetrait AT russingolf arescursinheterozygouspolledppcattleacomplexquantitativetrait AT seichterdoris arescursinheterozygouspolledppcattleacomplexquantitativetrait AT tetensjens arescursinheterozygouspolledppcattleacomplexquantitativetrait AT medugoracivica arescursinheterozygouspolledppcattleacomplexquantitativetrait AT thallergeorg arescursinheterozygouspolledppcattleacomplexquantitativetrait |