Cargando…
What is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold in young, asymptomatic subjects? A randomized placebo-controlled trial, with a cross-over design
BACKGROUND: Spinal manipulation (SM) has been shown to have an effect on the pressure pain threshold (PPT) in asymptomatic subjects, but SM has never been compared in studies on this topic to a validated sham procedure. We investigated the effect of SM on the PPT when measured i) in the area of inte...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32028982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-020-0296-1 |
_version_ | 1783495077788647424 |
---|---|
author | Honoré, Margaux Picchiottino, Mathieu Wedderkopp, Niels Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte Gagey, Olivier |
author_facet | Honoré, Margaux Picchiottino, Mathieu Wedderkopp, Niels Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte Gagey, Olivier |
author_sort | Honoré, Margaux |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Spinal manipulation (SM) has been shown to have an effect on the pressure pain threshold (PPT) in asymptomatic subjects, but SM has never been compared in studies on this topic to a validated sham procedure. We investigated the effect of SM on the PPT when measured i) in the area of intervention and ii) in an area remote from the intervention. In addition, we measured the size and duration of the effect. METHOD: In a randomized cross-over trial, 50 asymptomatic chiropractic students had their PPT measured at baseline, immediately after and every 12 min after intervention, over a period of 45 min, comparing values after SM and a previously validated sham. The trial was conducted during two sessions, separated by 48 h. PPT was measured both regionally and remotely from the ‘treated’ thoracic segment. Blinding of study subjects was tested with a post-intervention questionnaire. We used mixed linear regression with the baseline value and time as co-variates. If a significant difference were found between groups, then an effect size would be calculated using Cohen’s d or Hedge’s h coefficient. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Study subjects had been successfully blinded. No statistically significant differences were found between SM and sham estimates, at any time or anatomical location. CONCLUSION: When compared to a valid sham procedure and with successfully blinded subjects, there is no regional or remote effect of spinal manipulation of the thoracic spine on the pressure pain threshold in a young pain-free population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7006124 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70061242020-02-11 What is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold in young, asymptomatic subjects? A randomized placebo-controlled trial, with a cross-over design Honoré, Margaux Picchiottino, Mathieu Wedderkopp, Niels Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte Gagey, Olivier Chiropr Man Therap Research BACKGROUND: Spinal manipulation (SM) has been shown to have an effect on the pressure pain threshold (PPT) in asymptomatic subjects, but SM has never been compared in studies on this topic to a validated sham procedure. We investigated the effect of SM on the PPT when measured i) in the area of intervention and ii) in an area remote from the intervention. In addition, we measured the size and duration of the effect. METHOD: In a randomized cross-over trial, 50 asymptomatic chiropractic students had their PPT measured at baseline, immediately after and every 12 min after intervention, over a period of 45 min, comparing values after SM and a previously validated sham. The trial was conducted during two sessions, separated by 48 h. PPT was measured both regionally and remotely from the ‘treated’ thoracic segment. Blinding of study subjects was tested with a post-intervention questionnaire. We used mixed linear regression with the baseline value and time as co-variates. If a significant difference were found between groups, then an effect size would be calculated using Cohen’s d or Hedge’s h coefficient. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Study subjects had been successfully blinded. No statistically significant differences were found between SM and sham estimates, at any time or anatomical location. CONCLUSION: When compared to a valid sham procedure and with successfully blinded subjects, there is no regional or remote effect of spinal manipulation of the thoracic spine on the pressure pain threshold in a young pain-free population. BioMed Central 2020-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7006124/ /pubmed/32028982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-020-0296-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Honoré, Margaux Picchiottino, Mathieu Wedderkopp, Niels Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte Gagey, Olivier What is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold in young, asymptomatic subjects? A randomized placebo-controlled trial, with a cross-over design |
title | What is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold in young, asymptomatic subjects? A randomized placebo-controlled trial, with a cross-over design |
title_full | What is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold in young, asymptomatic subjects? A randomized placebo-controlled trial, with a cross-over design |
title_fullStr | What is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold in young, asymptomatic subjects? A randomized placebo-controlled trial, with a cross-over design |
title_full_unstemmed | What is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold in young, asymptomatic subjects? A randomized placebo-controlled trial, with a cross-over design |
title_short | What is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold in young, asymptomatic subjects? A randomized placebo-controlled trial, with a cross-over design |
title_sort | what is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold in young, asymptomatic subjects? a randomized placebo-controlled trial, with a cross-over design |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32028982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-020-0296-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT honoremargaux whatistheeffectofspinalmanipulationonthepressurepainthresholdinyoungasymptomaticsubjectsarandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialwithacrossoverdesign AT picchiottinomathieu whatistheeffectofspinalmanipulationonthepressurepainthresholdinyoungasymptomaticsubjectsarandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialwithacrossoverdesign AT wedderkoppniels whatistheeffectofspinalmanipulationonthepressurepainthresholdinyoungasymptomaticsubjectsarandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialwithacrossoverdesign AT leboeufydecharlotte whatistheeffectofspinalmanipulationonthepressurepainthresholdinyoungasymptomaticsubjectsarandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialwithacrossoverdesign AT gageyolivier whatistheeffectofspinalmanipulationonthepressurepainthresholdinyoungasymptomaticsubjectsarandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialwithacrossoverdesign |