Cargando…

Effect of DNase Treatment on Adhesion and Early Biofilm Formation of Enterococcus Faecalis

OBJECTIVE: Extracellular DNA (eDNA) has been shown to be important for biofilm stability of the endodontic pathogen Enterococcus faecalis. In this study, we hypothesized that treatment with DNase prevents adhesion and disperses young E. faecalis biofilms in 96-well plates and root canals of extracte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schlafer, Sebastian, Garcia, Javier, Meyer, Rikke L., Vaeth, Michael, Neuhaus, Klaus W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32161861
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2018.55264
_version_ 1783495173157683200
author Schlafer, Sebastian
Garcia, Javier
Meyer, Rikke L.
Vaeth, Michael
Neuhaus, Klaus W.
author_facet Schlafer, Sebastian
Garcia, Javier
Meyer, Rikke L.
Vaeth, Michael
Neuhaus, Klaus W.
author_sort Schlafer, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Extracellular DNA (eDNA) has been shown to be important for biofilm stability of the endodontic pathogen Enterococcus faecalis. In this study, we hypothesized that treatment with DNase prevents adhesion and disperses young E. faecalis biofilms in 96-well plates and root canals of extracted teeth. METHODS: E. faecalis eDNA in 96-well plates was visualized with TOTO-1®. The effect of DNase treatment was assessed in 96-well plates and in extracted single-rooted premolars (n=37) using a two-phase crossover design. E. faecalis was treated with DNase (50 Kunitz/mL) or heat-inactivated DNase for 1 h during adhesion or after 24 h of biofilm formation. In 96-well plates, adhering cells were quantified using confocal microscopy and digital image analysis. In root canals, the number of adhering cells was determined in dentine samples based on colony forming unit counts. Data from the 96-well plate were analyzed using one-tailed t-tests, and data from extracted teeth were analyzed using mixed-effect Poisson regressions. RESULTS: eDNA was present in wells colonized by E. faecalis after 1 h of adhesion and 24 h of biofilm formation; it was removed by DNase treatment, as evidenced by TOTO®-1 staining. DNase treatment reduced the area covered by cells in 96-well plates after 1 h (P<0.05), but not after 24 h (P=0.96). No significant differences in the number of adhering cells were observed in extracted teeth after 1 (P=0.14) and 24 h (P=0.98). CONCLUSION: DNase treatment does not disperse endodontic E. faecalis biofilms. The sole use of DNase as an anti-biofilm agent in root canal treatments is not recommendable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7006568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70065682020-03-11 Effect of DNase Treatment on Adhesion and Early Biofilm Formation of Enterococcus Faecalis Schlafer, Sebastian Garcia, Javier Meyer, Rikke L. Vaeth, Michael Neuhaus, Klaus W. Eur Endod J Original Article OBJECTIVE: Extracellular DNA (eDNA) has been shown to be important for biofilm stability of the endodontic pathogen Enterococcus faecalis. In this study, we hypothesized that treatment with DNase prevents adhesion and disperses young E. faecalis biofilms in 96-well plates and root canals of extracted teeth. METHODS: E. faecalis eDNA in 96-well plates was visualized with TOTO-1®. The effect of DNase treatment was assessed in 96-well plates and in extracted single-rooted premolars (n=37) using a two-phase crossover design. E. faecalis was treated with DNase (50 Kunitz/mL) or heat-inactivated DNase for 1 h during adhesion or after 24 h of biofilm formation. In 96-well plates, adhering cells were quantified using confocal microscopy and digital image analysis. In root canals, the number of adhering cells was determined in dentine samples based on colony forming unit counts. Data from the 96-well plate were analyzed using one-tailed t-tests, and data from extracted teeth were analyzed using mixed-effect Poisson regressions. RESULTS: eDNA was present in wells colonized by E. faecalis after 1 h of adhesion and 24 h of biofilm formation; it was removed by DNase treatment, as evidenced by TOTO®-1 staining. DNase treatment reduced the area covered by cells in 96-well plates after 1 h (P<0.05), but not after 24 h (P=0.96). No significant differences in the number of adhering cells were observed in extracted teeth after 1 (P=0.14) and 24 h (P=0.98). CONCLUSION: DNase treatment does not disperse endodontic E. faecalis biofilms. The sole use of DNase as an anti-biofilm agent in root canal treatments is not recommendable. Kare Publishing 2018-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7006568/ /pubmed/32161861 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2018.55264 Text en Copyright: © 2018 European Endodontic Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Schlafer, Sebastian
Garcia, Javier
Meyer, Rikke L.
Vaeth, Michael
Neuhaus, Klaus W.
Effect of DNase Treatment on Adhesion and Early Biofilm Formation of Enterococcus Faecalis
title Effect of DNase Treatment on Adhesion and Early Biofilm Formation of Enterococcus Faecalis
title_full Effect of DNase Treatment on Adhesion and Early Biofilm Formation of Enterococcus Faecalis
title_fullStr Effect of DNase Treatment on Adhesion and Early Biofilm Formation of Enterococcus Faecalis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of DNase Treatment on Adhesion and Early Biofilm Formation of Enterococcus Faecalis
title_short Effect of DNase Treatment on Adhesion and Early Biofilm Formation of Enterococcus Faecalis
title_sort effect of dnase treatment on adhesion and early biofilm formation of enterococcus faecalis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32161861
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2018.55264
work_keys_str_mv AT schlafersebastian effectofdnasetreatmentonadhesionandearlybiofilmformationofenterococcusfaecalis
AT garciajavier effectofdnasetreatmentonadhesionandearlybiofilmformationofenterococcusfaecalis
AT meyerrikkel effectofdnasetreatmentonadhesionandearlybiofilmformationofenterococcusfaecalis
AT vaethmichael effectofdnasetreatmentonadhesionandearlybiofilmformationofenterococcusfaecalis
AT neuhausklausw effectofdnasetreatmentonadhesionandearlybiofilmformationofenterococcusfaecalis