Cargando…

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Restored with Different Post Systems: An In Vitro Study

OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors with different post systems. METHODS: Fifty-six extracted intact maxillary permanent central incisors were used, treated endodontically (except for the control group), and di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fadag, Abdulrahman, Negm, Maged, Samran, Abdulaziz, Samran, Ahlam, Ahmed, Giraldine, Alqerban, Ali, Özcan, Mutlu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32161874
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2018.70299
_version_ 1783495175252738048
author Fadag, Abdulrahman
Negm, Maged
Samran, Abdulaziz
Samran, Ahlam
Ahmed, Giraldine
Alqerban, Ali
Özcan, Mutlu
author_facet Fadag, Abdulrahman
Negm, Maged
Samran, Abdulaziz
Samran, Ahlam
Ahmed, Giraldine
Alqerban, Ali
Özcan, Mutlu
author_sort Fadag, Abdulrahman
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors with different post systems. METHODS: Fifty-six extracted intact maxillary permanent central incisors were used, treated endodontically (except for the control group), and distributed into the following seven test groups (n=8) depending on the post type: UHT (control group: root-filled teeth without endodontic post), ZRP (prefabricated zirconia post), GFP (prefabricated glass fiber post), CFP (prefabricated carbon fiber post), CPC (custom-made cast post and core), TIP (prefabricated titanium post), and MIP (prefabricated mixed post). The specimens were loaded in a universal testing machine until fracture occurrence. Failure loads were then analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by multiple comparisons by using Tukey’s honest significant difference test (α=0.05). RESULTS: Mean (SD) failure loads for groups ranged from 524±73.2 N for CPC to 764.1±156 N for GFP. One-way ANOVA showed significant differences in terms of fracture resistances among groups (P<0.001). Tukey’s honest significant difference test showed significant differences in fracture resistance within groups (P≤0.05), whereas no difference was observed between the UHT (control group) and CFP and CPC groups (P≥0.05). CONCLUSION: Endodontically treated teeth restored with zirconia post, glass fiber post, titanium post, or mixed post were more resistant to fracture loads compared with those that were not restored (control group) or restored with either carbon fiber post or cast post and core.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7006576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70065762020-03-11 Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Restored with Different Post Systems: An In Vitro Study Fadag, Abdulrahman Negm, Maged Samran, Abdulaziz Samran, Ahlam Ahmed, Giraldine Alqerban, Ali Özcan, Mutlu Eur Endod J Original Article OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors with different post systems. METHODS: Fifty-six extracted intact maxillary permanent central incisors were used, treated endodontically (except for the control group), and distributed into the following seven test groups (n=8) depending on the post type: UHT (control group: root-filled teeth without endodontic post), ZRP (prefabricated zirconia post), GFP (prefabricated glass fiber post), CFP (prefabricated carbon fiber post), CPC (custom-made cast post and core), TIP (prefabricated titanium post), and MIP (prefabricated mixed post). The specimens were loaded in a universal testing machine until fracture occurrence. Failure loads were then analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by multiple comparisons by using Tukey’s honest significant difference test (α=0.05). RESULTS: Mean (SD) failure loads for groups ranged from 524±73.2 N for CPC to 764.1±156 N for GFP. One-way ANOVA showed significant differences in terms of fracture resistances among groups (P<0.001). Tukey’s honest significant difference test showed significant differences in fracture resistance within groups (P≤0.05), whereas no difference was observed between the UHT (control group) and CFP and CPC groups (P≥0.05). CONCLUSION: Endodontically treated teeth restored with zirconia post, glass fiber post, titanium post, or mixed post were more resistant to fracture loads compared with those that were not restored (control group) or restored with either carbon fiber post or cast post and core. Kare Publishing 2018-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7006576/ /pubmed/32161874 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2018.70299 Text en Copyright: © 2018 European Endodontic Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Fadag, Abdulrahman
Negm, Maged
Samran, Abdulaziz
Samran, Ahlam
Ahmed, Giraldine
Alqerban, Ali
Özcan, Mutlu
Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Restored with Different Post Systems: An In Vitro Study
title Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Restored with Different Post Systems: An In Vitro Study
title_full Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Restored with Different Post Systems: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Restored with Different Post Systems: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Restored with Different Post Systems: An In Vitro Study
title_short Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Restored with Different Post Systems: An In Vitro Study
title_sort fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with different post systems: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32161874
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2018.70299
work_keys_str_mv AT fadagabdulrahman fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedanteriorteethrestoredwithdifferentpostsystemsaninvitrostudy
AT negmmaged fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedanteriorteethrestoredwithdifferentpostsystemsaninvitrostudy
AT samranabdulaziz fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedanteriorteethrestoredwithdifferentpostsystemsaninvitrostudy
AT samranahlam fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedanteriorteethrestoredwithdifferentpostsystemsaninvitrostudy
AT ahmedgiraldine fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedanteriorteethrestoredwithdifferentpostsystemsaninvitrostudy
AT alqerbanali fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedanteriorteethrestoredwithdifferentpostsystemsaninvitrostudy
AT ozcanmutlu fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedanteriorteethrestoredwithdifferentpostsystemsaninvitrostudy