Cargando…

Detection of Simulated Periapical Lesion in Intraoral Digital Radiography with Different Brightness and Contrast

OBJECTIVE: To assess the detection of simulated periapical lesions in digital intraoral radiography with different levels of brightness and contrast combinations, and to investigate the observers’ preference of image quality for this diagnostic task. METHODS: Digital radiographs were acquired prior...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaêta-Araujo, Hugo, Nascimento, Eduarda Helena Leandro, Brasil, Danieli Moura, Gomes, Amanda Farias, Freitas, Deborah Queiroz, De Oliveira-Santos, Christiano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32161900
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2019.46036
_version_ 1783495179689263104
author Gaêta-Araujo, Hugo
Nascimento, Eduarda Helena Leandro
Brasil, Danieli Moura
Gomes, Amanda Farias
Freitas, Deborah Queiroz
De Oliveira-Santos, Christiano
author_facet Gaêta-Araujo, Hugo
Nascimento, Eduarda Helena Leandro
Brasil, Danieli Moura
Gomes, Amanda Farias
Freitas, Deborah Queiroz
De Oliveira-Santos, Christiano
author_sort Gaêta-Araujo, Hugo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the detection of simulated periapical lesions in digital intraoral radiography with different levels of brightness and contrast combinations, and to investigate the observers’ preference of image quality for this diagnostic task. METHODS: Digital radiographs were acquired prior to periapical lesion simulation and after each one of four defects enlargement. Original images were adjusted in 4 brightness and contrast combinations. Five observers evaluated the images according to the presence of periapical lesion on a 5-point scale. In a second moment, the observers ordinated the images subjectively, according to quality, from the best to the worst to detect the bone defect. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated for the diagnostic values and compared by two-way ANOVA. The significance level was set at 5% (P<0.05). RESULTS: No differences were found between the diagnostic values of the five combinations of brightness and contrast (P>0.05). The overall results showed low values of area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and sensitivity of the periapical radiography in the detection of periapical lesions of sizes from 1 to 3, which rose substantially in size 4. For image quality, combinations with the lowest brightness and highest contrast were preferred by the observers in 58% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Brightness and contrast adjustments do not influence the detection of simulated periapical lesions in digital intraoral radiography. Lower brightness and higher contrast images were preferred for this diagnostic task.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7006595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70065952020-03-11 Detection of Simulated Periapical Lesion in Intraoral Digital Radiography with Different Brightness and Contrast Gaêta-Araujo, Hugo Nascimento, Eduarda Helena Leandro Brasil, Danieli Moura Gomes, Amanda Farias Freitas, Deborah Queiroz De Oliveira-Santos, Christiano Eur Endod J Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the detection of simulated periapical lesions in digital intraoral radiography with different levels of brightness and contrast combinations, and to investigate the observers’ preference of image quality for this diagnostic task. METHODS: Digital radiographs were acquired prior to periapical lesion simulation and after each one of four defects enlargement. Original images were adjusted in 4 brightness and contrast combinations. Five observers evaluated the images according to the presence of periapical lesion on a 5-point scale. In a second moment, the observers ordinated the images subjectively, according to quality, from the best to the worst to detect the bone defect. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated for the diagnostic values and compared by two-way ANOVA. The significance level was set at 5% (P<0.05). RESULTS: No differences were found between the diagnostic values of the five combinations of brightness and contrast (P>0.05). The overall results showed low values of area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and sensitivity of the periapical radiography in the detection of periapical lesions of sizes from 1 to 3, which rose substantially in size 4. For image quality, combinations with the lowest brightness and highest contrast were preferred by the observers in 58% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Brightness and contrast adjustments do not influence the detection of simulated periapical lesions in digital intraoral radiography. Lower brightness and higher contrast images were preferred for this diagnostic task. Kare Publishing 2019-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7006595/ /pubmed/32161900 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2019.46036 Text en Copyright: © 2019 European Endodontic Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Gaêta-Araujo, Hugo
Nascimento, Eduarda Helena Leandro
Brasil, Danieli Moura
Gomes, Amanda Farias
Freitas, Deborah Queiroz
De Oliveira-Santos, Christiano
Detection of Simulated Periapical Lesion in Intraoral Digital Radiography with Different Brightness and Contrast
title Detection of Simulated Periapical Lesion in Intraoral Digital Radiography with Different Brightness and Contrast
title_full Detection of Simulated Periapical Lesion in Intraoral Digital Radiography with Different Brightness and Contrast
title_fullStr Detection of Simulated Periapical Lesion in Intraoral Digital Radiography with Different Brightness and Contrast
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Simulated Periapical Lesion in Intraoral Digital Radiography with Different Brightness and Contrast
title_short Detection of Simulated Periapical Lesion in Intraoral Digital Radiography with Different Brightness and Contrast
title_sort detection of simulated periapical lesion in intraoral digital radiography with different brightness and contrast
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32161900
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2019.46036
work_keys_str_mv AT gaetaaraujohugo detectionofsimulatedperiapicallesioninintraoraldigitalradiographywithdifferentbrightnessandcontrast
AT nascimentoeduardahelenaleandro detectionofsimulatedperiapicallesioninintraoraldigitalradiographywithdifferentbrightnessandcontrast
AT brasildanielimoura detectionofsimulatedperiapicallesioninintraoraldigitalradiographywithdifferentbrightnessandcontrast
AT gomesamandafarias detectionofsimulatedperiapicallesioninintraoraldigitalradiographywithdifferentbrightnessandcontrast
AT freitasdeborahqueiroz detectionofsimulatedperiapicallesioninintraoraldigitalradiographywithdifferentbrightnessandcontrast
AT deoliveirasantoschristiano detectionofsimulatedperiapicallesioninintraoraldigitalradiographywithdifferentbrightnessandcontrast