Cargando…

A systematic review on the accuracy of manufacturing techniques for cobalt chromium fixed dental prostheses

PURPOSE: To compare the fit and assess the accuracy of tooth-supported single and multi-unit FDPs in cobalt chromium fabricated using different manufacturing techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was performed in three databases; PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, using clearly spe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Svanborg, Per, Hjalmarsson, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32083253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1714445
_version_ 1783495202789392384
author Svanborg, Per
Hjalmarsson, Lars
author_facet Svanborg, Per
Hjalmarsson, Lars
author_sort Svanborg, Per
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the fit and assess the accuracy of tooth-supported single and multi-unit FDPs in cobalt chromium fabricated using different manufacturing techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was performed in three databases; PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, using clearly specified search terms and inclusion criteria. The search yielded 1071 articles and included 18 articles in the analysis. Data regarding the fit analyses and the methods of manufacturing were extracted and the accuracy was defined as the fit result minus the pre-set cement spacer. Internal gap (IntG) was the mean of all the internal measuring points and total gap (TotG) was the mean of all measuring points (marginal, cervical, chamfer, axial, occlusal). RESULTS: The total gap results for fit and accuracy irrespective of manufacturing technique were 96 μm and 54 μm for single crowns, 107 μm and 54 μm for multi-unit FDPs, and 98 μm and 54 μm for both single crowns and multi-unit FDPs combined. For total gap of single crowns soft milling had the highest accuracy, for multi-unit FDPs additive manufactured restorations had the highest accuracy. With the results grouped by impression technique, the accuracy for total gap was highest for digital impressions and lower for conventional impressions. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the inherent limitations of this systematic review, it still remains unclear what effect the manufacturing technique has on the fit of FDPs. However, the descriptive results suggest that the marginal fit of cobalt chromium FDPs is not negatively affected by the manufacturing technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7006738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70067382020-02-20 A systematic review on the accuracy of manufacturing techniques for cobalt chromium fixed dental prostheses Svanborg, Per Hjalmarsson, Lars Biomater Investig Dent Review Article PURPOSE: To compare the fit and assess the accuracy of tooth-supported single and multi-unit FDPs in cobalt chromium fabricated using different manufacturing techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was performed in three databases; PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, using clearly specified search terms and inclusion criteria. The search yielded 1071 articles and included 18 articles in the analysis. Data regarding the fit analyses and the methods of manufacturing were extracted and the accuracy was defined as the fit result minus the pre-set cement spacer. Internal gap (IntG) was the mean of all the internal measuring points and total gap (TotG) was the mean of all measuring points (marginal, cervical, chamfer, axial, occlusal). RESULTS: The total gap results for fit and accuracy irrespective of manufacturing technique were 96 μm and 54 μm for single crowns, 107 μm and 54 μm for multi-unit FDPs, and 98 μm and 54 μm for both single crowns and multi-unit FDPs combined. For total gap of single crowns soft milling had the highest accuracy, for multi-unit FDPs additive manufactured restorations had the highest accuracy. With the results grouped by impression technique, the accuracy for total gap was highest for digital impressions and lower for conventional impressions. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the inherent limitations of this systematic review, it still remains unclear what effect the manufacturing technique has on the fit of FDPs. However, the descriptive results suggest that the marginal fit of cobalt chromium FDPs is not negatively affected by the manufacturing technique. Taylor & Francis 2020-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7006738/ /pubmed/32083253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1714445 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Svanborg, Per
Hjalmarsson, Lars
A systematic review on the accuracy of manufacturing techniques for cobalt chromium fixed dental prostheses
title A systematic review on the accuracy of manufacturing techniques for cobalt chromium fixed dental prostheses
title_full A systematic review on the accuracy of manufacturing techniques for cobalt chromium fixed dental prostheses
title_fullStr A systematic review on the accuracy of manufacturing techniques for cobalt chromium fixed dental prostheses
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review on the accuracy of manufacturing techniques for cobalt chromium fixed dental prostheses
title_short A systematic review on the accuracy of manufacturing techniques for cobalt chromium fixed dental prostheses
title_sort systematic review on the accuracy of manufacturing techniques for cobalt chromium fixed dental prostheses
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32083253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1714445
work_keys_str_mv AT svanborgper asystematicreviewontheaccuracyofmanufacturingtechniquesforcobaltchromiumfixeddentalprostheses
AT hjalmarssonlars asystematicreviewontheaccuracyofmanufacturingtechniquesforcobaltchromiumfixeddentalprostheses
AT svanborgper systematicreviewontheaccuracyofmanufacturingtechniquesforcobaltchromiumfixeddentalprostheses
AT hjalmarssonlars systematicreviewontheaccuracyofmanufacturingtechniquesforcobaltchromiumfixeddentalprostheses