Cargando…
The neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors
Background and purpose — The neck–shaft angle (NSA) is valuable for diagnostics and therapy of the hip, but current reference values derive mostly from studies on anatomic specimens, small cohorts, or are hospital-based. Moreover, associated factors such as age, sex, or anthropometric data have rare...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31735107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1690873 |
_version_ | 1783495203027419136 |
---|---|
author | Fischer, Cornelius S Kühn, Jens-Peter Völzke, Henry Ittermann, Till Gümbel, Denis Kasch, Richard Haralambiev, Lyubomir Laqua, René Hinz, Peter Lange, Jörn |
author_facet | Fischer, Cornelius S Kühn, Jens-Peter Völzke, Henry Ittermann, Till Gümbel, Denis Kasch, Richard Haralambiev, Lyubomir Laqua, René Hinz, Peter Lange, Jörn |
author_sort | Fischer, Cornelius S |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and purpose — The neck–shaft angle (NSA) is valuable for diagnostics and therapy of the hip, but current reference values derive mostly from studies on anatomic specimens, small cohorts, or are hospital-based. Moreover, associated factors such as age, sex, or anthropometric data have rarely been considered. Therefore, we determined associated factors for NSA and reassessed the historical reference values in a general adult population. Methods — NSAs on both sides of 3,226 volunteers from the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) were measured with MRI. SHIP drew a representative sample of the population of Pomerania (northeastern Germany). NSAs were compared with sex, age, and anthropometric data by bivariable linear regression models. Reference values were assessed by quantile regressions for 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles. Results — The mean NSA was 127° (SD 7), while men had a lower NSA than women (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4°–1.4°). The reference range was 114°–140°. Age was inversely associated with NSA (CI –0.2 to –0.1). Body height was positively associated with the NSA, while BMI and waist circumference showed a negative association. There was no association between body weight and NSA. Interpretation — The historical lower limit of 120° might be too high, so the radiological prevalence of hip pathology might have been overestimated. The previously reported influence of age, sex, and body height on the NSA has been confirmed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7006743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70067432020-02-20 The neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors Fischer, Cornelius S Kühn, Jens-Peter Völzke, Henry Ittermann, Till Gümbel, Denis Kasch, Richard Haralambiev, Lyubomir Laqua, René Hinz, Peter Lange, Jörn Acta Orthop Hip Background and purpose — The neck–shaft angle (NSA) is valuable for diagnostics and therapy of the hip, but current reference values derive mostly from studies on anatomic specimens, small cohorts, or are hospital-based. Moreover, associated factors such as age, sex, or anthropometric data have rarely been considered. Therefore, we determined associated factors for NSA and reassessed the historical reference values in a general adult population. Methods — NSAs on both sides of 3,226 volunteers from the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) were measured with MRI. SHIP drew a representative sample of the population of Pomerania (northeastern Germany). NSAs were compared with sex, age, and anthropometric data by bivariable linear regression models. Reference values were assessed by quantile regressions for 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles. Results — The mean NSA was 127° (SD 7), while men had a lower NSA than women (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4°–1.4°). The reference range was 114°–140°. Age was inversely associated with NSA (CI –0.2 to –0.1). Body height was positively associated with the NSA, while BMI and waist circumference showed a negative association. There was no association between body weight and NSA. Interpretation — The historical lower limit of 120° might be too high, so the radiological prevalence of hip pathology might have been overestimated. The previously reported influence of age, sex, and body height on the NSA has been confirmed. Taylor & Francis 2019-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7006743/ /pubmed/31735107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1690873 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Hip Fischer, Cornelius S Kühn, Jens-Peter Völzke, Henry Ittermann, Till Gümbel, Denis Kasch, Richard Haralambiev, Lyubomir Laqua, René Hinz, Peter Lange, Jörn The neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors |
title | The neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors |
title_full | The neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors |
title_fullStr | The neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors |
title_full_unstemmed | The neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors |
title_short | The neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors |
title_sort | neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors |
topic | Hip |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31735107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1690873 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fischercorneliuss theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT kuhnjenspeter theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT volzkehenry theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT ittermanntill theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT gumbeldenis theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT kaschrichard theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT haralambievlyubomir theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT laquarene theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT hinzpeter theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT langejorn theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT fischercorneliuss neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT kuhnjenspeter neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT volzkehenry neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT ittermanntill neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT gumbeldenis neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT kaschrichard neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT haralambievlyubomir neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT laquarene neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT hinzpeter neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors AT langejorn neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors |