Cargando…

The neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors

Background and purpose — The neck–shaft angle (NSA) is valuable for diagnostics and therapy of the hip, but current reference values derive mostly from studies on anatomic specimens, small cohorts, or are hospital-based. Moreover, associated factors such as age, sex, or anthropometric data have rare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fischer, Cornelius S, Kühn, Jens-Peter, Völzke, Henry, Ittermann, Till, Gümbel, Denis, Kasch, Richard, Haralambiev, Lyubomir, Laqua, René, Hinz, Peter, Lange, Jörn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Hip
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31735107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1690873
_version_ 1783495203027419136
author Fischer, Cornelius S
Kühn, Jens-Peter
Völzke, Henry
Ittermann, Till
Gümbel, Denis
Kasch, Richard
Haralambiev, Lyubomir
Laqua, René
Hinz, Peter
Lange, Jörn
author_facet Fischer, Cornelius S
Kühn, Jens-Peter
Völzke, Henry
Ittermann, Till
Gümbel, Denis
Kasch, Richard
Haralambiev, Lyubomir
Laqua, René
Hinz, Peter
Lange, Jörn
author_sort Fischer, Cornelius S
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose — The neck–shaft angle (NSA) is valuable for diagnostics and therapy of the hip, but current reference values derive mostly from studies on anatomic specimens, small cohorts, or are hospital-based. Moreover, associated factors such as age, sex, or anthropometric data have rarely been considered. Therefore, we determined associated factors for NSA and reassessed the historical reference values in a general adult population. Methods — NSAs on both sides of 3,226 volunteers from the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) were measured with MRI. SHIP drew a representative sample of the population of Pomerania (northeastern Germany). NSAs were compared with sex, age, and anthropometric data by bivariable linear regression models. Reference values were assessed by quantile regressions for 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles. Results — The mean NSA was 127° (SD 7), while men had a lower NSA than women (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4°–1.4°). The reference range was 114°–140°. Age was inversely associated with NSA (CI –0.2 to –0.1). Body height was positively associated with the NSA, while BMI and waist circumference showed a negative association. There was no association between body weight and NSA. Interpretation — The historical lower limit of 120° might be too high, so the radiological prevalence of hip pathology might have been overestimated. The previously reported influence of age, sex, and body height on the NSA has been confirmed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7006743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70067432020-02-20 The neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors Fischer, Cornelius S Kühn, Jens-Peter Völzke, Henry Ittermann, Till Gümbel, Denis Kasch, Richard Haralambiev, Lyubomir Laqua, René Hinz, Peter Lange, Jörn Acta Orthop Hip Background and purpose — The neck–shaft angle (NSA) is valuable for diagnostics and therapy of the hip, but current reference values derive mostly from studies on anatomic specimens, small cohorts, or are hospital-based. Moreover, associated factors such as age, sex, or anthropometric data have rarely been considered. Therefore, we determined associated factors for NSA and reassessed the historical reference values in a general adult population. Methods — NSAs on both sides of 3,226 volunteers from the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) were measured with MRI. SHIP drew a representative sample of the population of Pomerania (northeastern Germany). NSAs were compared with sex, age, and anthropometric data by bivariable linear regression models. Reference values were assessed by quantile regressions for 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles. Results — The mean NSA was 127° (SD 7), while men had a lower NSA than women (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4°–1.4°). The reference range was 114°–140°. Age was inversely associated with NSA (CI –0.2 to –0.1). Body height was positively associated with the NSA, while BMI and waist circumference showed a negative association. There was no association between body weight and NSA. Interpretation — The historical lower limit of 120° might be too high, so the radiological prevalence of hip pathology might have been overestimated. The previously reported influence of age, sex, and body height on the NSA has been confirmed. Taylor & Francis 2019-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7006743/ /pubmed/31735107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1690873 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Hip
Fischer, Cornelius S
Kühn, Jens-Peter
Völzke, Henry
Ittermann, Till
Gümbel, Denis
Kasch, Richard
Haralambiev, Lyubomir
Laqua, René
Hinz, Peter
Lange, Jörn
The neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors
title The neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors
title_full The neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors
title_fullStr The neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors
title_full_unstemmed The neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors
title_short The neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors
title_sort neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors
topic Hip
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31735107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1690873
work_keys_str_mv AT fischercorneliuss theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT kuhnjenspeter theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT volzkehenry theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT ittermanntill theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT gumbeldenis theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT kaschrichard theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT haralambievlyubomir theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT laquarene theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT hinzpeter theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT langejorn theneckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT fischercorneliuss neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT kuhnjenspeter neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT volzkehenry neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT ittermanntill neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT gumbeldenis neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT kaschrichard neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT haralambievlyubomir neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT laquarene neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT hinzpeter neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors
AT langejorn neckshaftangleanupdateonreferencevaluesandassociatedfactors