Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on glass ionomer cement – a spectrophotometric analysis

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC). The different surface protective agents used were: Vaseline(®), GC Fuji VARNISH™ (varnish), G-Coat Plus™ (resin) and EQUIA(®) Coat (resin). METHOD: Thirty-six id...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tyagi, Shreya, Thomas, Abi M., Sinnappah-Kang, Neeta Devi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32083252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1711760
_version_ 1783495204495425536
author Tyagi, Shreya
Thomas, Abi M.
Sinnappah-Kang, Neeta Devi
author_facet Tyagi, Shreya
Thomas, Abi M.
Sinnappah-Kang, Neeta Devi
author_sort Tyagi, Shreya
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC). The different surface protective agents used were: Vaseline(®), GC Fuji VARNISH™ (varnish), G-Coat Plus™ (resin) and EQUIA(®) Coat (resin). METHOD: Thirty-six identical specimens of GIC were made. Six specimens were used in preparation of standard solution and remaining thirty were divided into five groups with six specimens in each group. Each test specimen was coated with one of the surface protecting agent except for the control group. The specimens were immersed separately into 1 ml of 0.05% methylene blue solution for 24 h and then rinsed with deionised water and further immersed into tubes containing 1 ml of 65% nitric acid. Specimens, once completely dissolved in nitric acid solution, were filtered and centrifuged. The supernatant was used to determine the absorbance using a spectrophotometer. The effectiveness of the surface protecting agents for the GIC was recorded in micrograms of dye per specimen, where low values indicate good protection. RESULT: Tukey HSD test revealed that GC Fuji VARNISH™ (varnish; mean = 21.25 µg/ml), G-Coat Plus™ (resin; mean = 30.39 µg/ml) and EQUIA(®) Coat (resin; mean = 9.32 µg/ml) were statistically not significantly different to each other and were effective in protecting the surface of GIC. SIGNIFICANCE: The study found that there was a statistically significant difference between control and GC Fuji VARNISH™, G-Coat Plus™ and EQUIA(®) Coat. The three agents were found to be equally effective in protecting the surface of GIC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7006751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70067512020-02-20 A comparative evaluation of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on glass ionomer cement – a spectrophotometric analysis Tyagi, Shreya Thomas, Abi M. Sinnappah-Kang, Neeta Devi Biomater Investig Dent Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC). The different surface protective agents used were: Vaseline(®), GC Fuji VARNISH™ (varnish), G-Coat Plus™ (resin) and EQUIA(®) Coat (resin). METHOD: Thirty-six identical specimens of GIC were made. Six specimens were used in preparation of standard solution and remaining thirty were divided into five groups with six specimens in each group. Each test specimen was coated with one of the surface protecting agent except for the control group. The specimens were immersed separately into 1 ml of 0.05% methylene blue solution for 24 h and then rinsed with deionised water and further immersed into tubes containing 1 ml of 65% nitric acid. Specimens, once completely dissolved in nitric acid solution, were filtered and centrifuged. The supernatant was used to determine the absorbance using a spectrophotometer. The effectiveness of the surface protecting agents for the GIC was recorded in micrograms of dye per specimen, where low values indicate good protection. RESULT: Tukey HSD test revealed that GC Fuji VARNISH™ (varnish; mean = 21.25 µg/ml), G-Coat Plus™ (resin; mean = 30.39 µg/ml) and EQUIA(®) Coat (resin; mean = 9.32 µg/ml) were statistically not significantly different to each other and were effective in protecting the surface of GIC. SIGNIFICANCE: The study found that there was a statistically significant difference between control and GC Fuji VARNISH™, G-Coat Plus™ and EQUIA(®) Coat. The three agents were found to be equally effective in protecting the surface of GIC. Taylor & Francis 2020-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7006751/ /pubmed/32083252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1711760 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tyagi, Shreya
Thomas, Abi M.
Sinnappah-Kang, Neeta Devi
A comparative evaluation of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on glass ionomer cement – a spectrophotometric analysis
title A comparative evaluation of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on glass ionomer cement – a spectrophotometric analysis
title_full A comparative evaluation of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on glass ionomer cement – a spectrophotometric analysis
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on glass ionomer cement – a spectrophotometric analysis
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on glass ionomer cement – a spectrophotometric analysis
title_short A comparative evaluation of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on glass ionomer cement – a spectrophotometric analysis
title_sort comparative evaluation of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on glass ionomer cement – a spectrophotometric analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32083252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1711760
work_keys_str_mv AT tyagishreya acomparativeevaluationofresinandvarnishbasedsurfaceprotectiveagentsonglassionomercementaspectrophotometricanalysis
AT thomasabim acomparativeevaluationofresinandvarnishbasedsurfaceprotectiveagentsonglassionomercementaspectrophotometricanalysis
AT sinnappahkangneetadevi acomparativeevaluationofresinandvarnishbasedsurfaceprotectiveagentsonglassionomercementaspectrophotometricanalysis
AT tyagishreya comparativeevaluationofresinandvarnishbasedsurfaceprotectiveagentsonglassionomercementaspectrophotometricanalysis
AT thomasabim comparativeevaluationofresinandvarnishbasedsurfaceprotectiveagentsonglassionomercementaspectrophotometricanalysis
AT sinnappahkangneetadevi comparativeevaluationofresinandvarnishbasedsurfaceprotectiveagentsonglassionomercementaspectrophotometricanalysis