Cargando…
A comparative evaluation of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on glass ionomer cement – a spectrophotometric analysis
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC). The different surface protective agents used were: Vaseline(®), GC Fuji VARNISH™ (varnish), G-Coat Plus™ (resin) and EQUIA(®) Coat (resin). METHOD: Thirty-six id...
Autores principales: | Tyagi, Shreya, Thomas, Abi M., Sinnappah-Kang, Neeta Devi |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32083252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1711760 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparative evaluation of microleakage in conventional glass ionomer cements and triclosan incorporated glass ionomer cements
por: Somani, Rani, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Do conventional glass ionomer cements release more fluoride than resin-modified glass ionomer cements?
por: Cabral, Maria Fernanda Costa, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Chemical Surface Modification Methods of Resin Composite Repaired with Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement
por: Klaisiri, Awiruth, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Fluoride release and uptake in enhanced bioactivity glass ionomer cement (“glass carbomer™”) compared with conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements
por: HASAN, Ammar M. H. R., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Comparison of the Amount of Fluoride Release from Nanofilled Resin Modified Glass Ionomer, Conventional and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements
por: Upadhyay, Sumitha, et al.
Publicado: (2013)