Cargando…

The Detection of Spontaneous Venous Pulsation with Smartphone Video Ophthalmoscopy

PURPOSE: Spontaneous venous pulsation (SVP) has a high negative predictive value for raised intracranial pressure and is a useful sign when assessing patients with headache. The objective was to determine if smartphone-based video ophthalmoscopy can detect SVP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total 233 pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laurent, Charlotte, Hong, Sheng Chiong, Cheyne, Kirsten R, Ogbuehi, Kelechi C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32099318
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S238897
_version_ 1783495219634765824
author Laurent, Charlotte
Hong, Sheng Chiong
Cheyne, Kirsten R
Ogbuehi, Kelechi C
author_facet Laurent, Charlotte
Hong, Sheng Chiong
Cheyne, Kirsten R
Ogbuehi, Kelechi C
author_sort Laurent, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Spontaneous venous pulsation (SVP) has a high negative predictive value for raised intracranial pressure and is a useful sign when assessing patients with headache. The objective was to determine if smartphone-based video ophthalmoscopy can detect SVP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total 233 patients and 291 eyes were recruited from the Dunedin Hospital eye clinic from July to November 2018. Patients were examined by a clinician and graded for SVP with a slit lamp and 78 Dioptre lens. Videos were taken with a smartphone ophthalmoscope and graded by two separate clinicians blinded to the slit lamp findings. RESULTS: Only 272 eyes of 215 patients were included, as others failed in the inclusion criteria for overall video quality. Sensitivity was calculated as how likely the presence of SVP on video was indicative of the presence of SVP on slit lamp. Sensitivity was 84.77% for Observer 1, with 128 videos graded as positive for SVP on video ophthalmoscopy of the 151 identified as positive on slit lamp examination. Sensitivity was 76.82% for Observer 2 with 116 videos correctly identified. The false positive rate was calculated as the number of videos graded positive for SVP that had been graded as negative on slit lamp examination. This was 10.74% for observer 1 and 31.40% for observer 2. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that SVP is detected by video ophthalmoscopy. This may be a useful triage, telemedicine and referral tool to be used for patients with headache in a primary care setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7006856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70068562020-02-25 The Detection of Spontaneous Venous Pulsation with Smartphone Video Ophthalmoscopy Laurent, Charlotte Hong, Sheng Chiong Cheyne, Kirsten R Ogbuehi, Kelechi C Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: Spontaneous venous pulsation (SVP) has a high negative predictive value for raised intracranial pressure and is a useful sign when assessing patients with headache. The objective was to determine if smartphone-based video ophthalmoscopy can detect SVP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total 233 patients and 291 eyes were recruited from the Dunedin Hospital eye clinic from July to November 2018. Patients were examined by a clinician and graded for SVP with a slit lamp and 78 Dioptre lens. Videos were taken with a smartphone ophthalmoscope and graded by two separate clinicians blinded to the slit lamp findings. RESULTS: Only 272 eyes of 215 patients were included, as others failed in the inclusion criteria for overall video quality. Sensitivity was calculated as how likely the presence of SVP on video was indicative of the presence of SVP on slit lamp. Sensitivity was 84.77% for Observer 1, with 128 videos graded as positive for SVP on video ophthalmoscopy of the 151 identified as positive on slit lamp examination. Sensitivity was 76.82% for Observer 2 with 116 videos correctly identified. The false positive rate was calculated as the number of videos graded positive for SVP that had been graded as negative on slit lamp examination. This was 10.74% for observer 1 and 31.40% for observer 2. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that SVP is detected by video ophthalmoscopy. This may be a useful triage, telemedicine and referral tool to be used for patients with headache in a primary care setting. Dove 2020-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7006856/ /pubmed/32099318 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S238897 Text en © 2020 Laurent et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Laurent, Charlotte
Hong, Sheng Chiong
Cheyne, Kirsten R
Ogbuehi, Kelechi C
The Detection of Spontaneous Venous Pulsation with Smartphone Video Ophthalmoscopy
title The Detection of Spontaneous Venous Pulsation with Smartphone Video Ophthalmoscopy
title_full The Detection of Spontaneous Venous Pulsation with Smartphone Video Ophthalmoscopy
title_fullStr The Detection of Spontaneous Venous Pulsation with Smartphone Video Ophthalmoscopy
title_full_unstemmed The Detection of Spontaneous Venous Pulsation with Smartphone Video Ophthalmoscopy
title_short The Detection of Spontaneous Venous Pulsation with Smartphone Video Ophthalmoscopy
title_sort detection of spontaneous venous pulsation with smartphone video ophthalmoscopy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32099318
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S238897
work_keys_str_mv AT laurentcharlotte thedetectionofspontaneousvenouspulsationwithsmartphonevideoophthalmoscopy
AT hongshengchiong thedetectionofspontaneousvenouspulsationwithsmartphonevideoophthalmoscopy
AT cheynekirstenr thedetectionofspontaneousvenouspulsationwithsmartphonevideoophthalmoscopy
AT ogbuehikelechic thedetectionofspontaneousvenouspulsationwithsmartphonevideoophthalmoscopy
AT laurentcharlotte detectionofspontaneousvenouspulsationwithsmartphonevideoophthalmoscopy
AT hongshengchiong detectionofspontaneousvenouspulsationwithsmartphonevideoophthalmoscopy
AT cheynekirstenr detectionofspontaneousvenouspulsationwithsmartphonevideoophthalmoscopy
AT ogbuehikelechic detectionofspontaneousvenouspulsationwithsmartphonevideoophthalmoscopy