Cargando…
Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs
BACKGROUND: Breast implant-related health problems are a subject of fierce debate. Reliable population-based estimates of implant prevalence rates are not available, however, due to a lack of historical registries and incomplete sales data, precluding absolute risk assessments. OBJECTIVES: This stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31242279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz136 |
_version_ | 1783495221808463872 |
---|---|
author | de Boer, Mintsje van Middelkoop, Michele Hauptmann, Michael van der Bijl, Noortje Bosmans, Jorn A W Hendriks-Brouwer, Narda Schop, Sijmen J de Boer, Jan Paul Hijmering, Nathalie J Overbeek, Lucy I H Lobbes, Marc B I Klazen, Caroline A H de Jong, Daphne Rakhorst, Hinne A van der Hulst, René R W J van Leeuwen, Flora E |
author_facet | de Boer, Mintsje van Middelkoop, Michele Hauptmann, Michael van der Bijl, Noortje Bosmans, Jorn A W Hendriks-Brouwer, Narda Schop, Sijmen J de Boer, Jan Paul Hijmering, Nathalie J Overbeek, Lucy I H Lobbes, Marc B I Klazen, Caroline A H de Jong, Daphne Rakhorst, Hinne A van der Hulst, René R W J van Leeuwen, Flora E |
author_sort | de Boer, Mintsje |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Breast implant-related health problems are a subject of fierce debate. Reliable population-based estimates of implant prevalence rates are not available, however, due to a lack of historical registries and incomplete sales data, precluding absolute risk assessments. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the methodology of a novel procedure to determine Dutch breast implant prevalence based on the evaluation of routine chest radiographs. METHODS: The validity of the new method was first examined in a separate study. Eight reviewers examined a series of 180 chest radiographs with (n = 60) or without (n = 120) a breast implant confirmed by a computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan. After a consensus meeting with best-performing expert reviewers, we reviewed 3000 chest radiographs of women aged 20 to 70 years in 2 large regional hospitals in the Netherlands in 2015. To calculate the national breast implant prevalence, regional prevalence variations were corrected utilizing the National Breast Cancer Screening Program. RESULTS: Eight reviewers scored with a median sensitivity of 71.7% (range, 41.7%-85.0%) and a median specificity of 94.6% (range, 73.4%-97.5%). After a consensus meeting and a reevaluation by best-performing expert reviewers, sensitivity was 79.9% and specificity was 99.2%. The estimated national prevalence of breast implants among women between 20 and 70 years was 3.0%, ranging from 1.7% at 21 to 30 years to 3.9% between 51 and 60 years. CONCLUSIONS: The novel method in this study was validated with a high sensitivity and specificity, resulting in accurate prevalence estimates and providing the opportunity to conduct absolute risk assessment studies on the health consequences of breast implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2: [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7006872 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70068722020-02-11 Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs de Boer, Mintsje van Middelkoop, Michele Hauptmann, Michael van der Bijl, Noortje Bosmans, Jorn A W Hendriks-Brouwer, Narda Schop, Sijmen J de Boer, Jan Paul Hijmering, Nathalie J Overbeek, Lucy I H Lobbes, Marc B I Klazen, Caroline A H de Jong, Daphne Rakhorst, Hinne A van der Hulst, René R W J van Leeuwen, Flora E Aesthet Surg J Breast Surgery BACKGROUND: Breast implant-related health problems are a subject of fierce debate. Reliable population-based estimates of implant prevalence rates are not available, however, due to a lack of historical registries and incomplete sales data, precluding absolute risk assessments. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the methodology of a novel procedure to determine Dutch breast implant prevalence based on the evaluation of routine chest radiographs. METHODS: The validity of the new method was first examined in a separate study. Eight reviewers examined a series of 180 chest radiographs with (n = 60) or without (n = 120) a breast implant confirmed by a computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan. After a consensus meeting with best-performing expert reviewers, we reviewed 3000 chest radiographs of women aged 20 to 70 years in 2 large regional hospitals in the Netherlands in 2015. To calculate the national breast implant prevalence, regional prevalence variations were corrected utilizing the National Breast Cancer Screening Program. RESULTS: Eight reviewers scored with a median sensitivity of 71.7% (range, 41.7%-85.0%) and a median specificity of 94.6% (range, 73.4%-97.5%). After a consensus meeting and a reevaluation by best-performing expert reviewers, sensitivity was 79.9% and specificity was 99.2%. The estimated national prevalence of breast implants among women between 20 and 70 years was 3.0%, ranging from 1.7% at 21 to 30 years to 3.9% between 51 and 60 years. CONCLUSIONS: The novel method in this study was validated with a high sensitivity and specificity, resulting in accurate prevalence estimates and providing the opportunity to conduct absolute risk assessment studies on the health consequences of breast implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2: [Image: see text] Oxford University Press 2020-01 2019-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7006872/ /pubmed/31242279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz136 Text en © 2019 The Aesthetic Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Breast Surgery de Boer, Mintsje van Middelkoop, Michele Hauptmann, Michael van der Bijl, Noortje Bosmans, Jorn A W Hendriks-Brouwer, Narda Schop, Sijmen J de Boer, Jan Paul Hijmering, Nathalie J Overbeek, Lucy I H Lobbes, Marc B I Klazen, Caroline A H de Jong, Daphne Rakhorst, Hinne A van der Hulst, René R W J van Leeuwen, Flora E Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs |
title | Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs |
title_full | Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs |
title_fullStr | Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs |
title_full_unstemmed | Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs |
title_short | Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs |
title_sort | breast implant prevalence in the dutch female population assessed by chest radiographs |
topic | Breast Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31242279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz136 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deboermintsje breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs AT vanmiddelkoopmichele breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs AT hauptmannmichael breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs AT vanderbijlnoortje breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs AT bosmansjornaw breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs AT hendriksbrouwernarda breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs AT schopsijmenj breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs AT deboerjanpaul breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs AT hijmeringnathaliej breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs AT overbeeklucyih breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs AT lobbesmarcbi breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs AT klazencarolineah breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs AT dejongdaphne breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs AT rakhorsthinnea breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs AT vanderhulstrenerwj breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs AT vanleeuwenflorae breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs |