Cargando…

Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs

BACKGROUND: Breast implant-related health problems are a subject of fierce debate. Reliable population-based estimates of implant prevalence rates are not available, however, due to a lack of historical registries and incomplete sales data, precluding absolute risk assessments. OBJECTIVES: This stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Boer, Mintsje, van Middelkoop, Michele, Hauptmann, Michael, van der Bijl, Noortje, Bosmans, Jorn A W, Hendriks-Brouwer, Narda, Schop, Sijmen J, de Boer, Jan Paul, Hijmering, Nathalie J, Overbeek, Lucy I H, Lobbes, Marc B I, Klazen, Caroline A H, de Jong, Daphne, Rakhorst, Hinne A, van der Hulst, René R W J, van Leeuwen, Flora E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31242279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz136
_version_ 1783495221808463872
author de Boer, Mintsje
van Middelkoop, Michele
Hauptmann, Michael
van der Bijl, Noortje
Bosmans, Jorn A W
Hendriks-Brouwer, Narda
Schop, Sijmen J
de Boer, Jan Paul
Hijmering, Nathalie J
Overbeek, Lucy I H
Lobbes, Marc B I
Klazen, Caroline A H
de Jong, Daphne
Rakhorst, Hinne A
van der Hulst, René R W J
van Leeuwen, Flora E
author_facet de Boer, Mintsje
van Middelkoop, Michele
Hauptmann, Michael
van der Bijl, Noortje
Bosmans, Jorn A W
Hendriks-Brouwer, Narda
Schop, Sijmen J
de Boer, Jan Paul
Hijmering, Nathalie J
Overbeek, Lucy I H
Lobbes, Marc B I
Klazen, Caroline A H
de Jong, Daphne
Rakhorst, Hinne A
van der Hulst, René R W J
van Leeuwen, Flora E
author_sort de Boer, Mintsje
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breast implant-related health problems are a subject of fierce debate. Reliable population-based estimates of implant prevalence rates are not available, however, due to a lack of historical registries and incomplete sales data, precluding absolute risk assessments. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the methodology of a novel procedure to determine Dutch breast implant prevalence based on the evaluation of routine chest radiographs. METHODS: The validity of the new method was first examined in a separate study. Eight reviewers examined a series of 180 chest radiographs with (n = 60) or without (n = 120) a breast implant confirmed by a computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan. After a consensus meeting with best-performing expert reviewers, we reviewed 3000 chest radiographs of women aged 20 to 70 years in 2 large regional hospitals in the Netherlands in 2015. To calculate the national breast implant prevalence, regional prevalence variations were corrected utilizing the National Breast Cancer Screening Program. RESULTS: Eight reviewers scored with a median sensitivity of 71.7% (range, 41.7%-85.0%) and a median specificity of 94.6% (range, 73.4%-97.5%). After a consensus meeting and a reevaluation by best-performing expert reviewers, sensitivity was 79.9% and specificity was 99.2%. The estimated national prevalence of breast implants among women between 20 and 70 years was 3.0%, ranging from 1.7% at 21 to 30 years to 3.9% between 51 and 60 years. CONCLUSIONS: The novel method in this study was validated with a high sensitivity and specificity, resulting in accurate prevalence estimates and providing the opportunity to conduct absolute risk assessment studies on the health consequences of breast implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7006872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70068722020-02-11 Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs de Boer, Mintsje van Middelkoop, Michele Hauptmann, Michael van der Bijl, Noortje Bosmans, Jorn A W Hendriks-Brouwer, Narda Schop, Sijmen J de Boer, Jan Paul Hijmering, Nathalie J Overbeek, Lucy I H Lobbes, Marc B I Klazen, Caroline A H de Jong, Daphne Rakhorst, Hinne A van der Hulst, René R W J van Leeuwen, Flora E Aesthet Surg J Breast Surgery BACKGROUND: Breast implant-related health problems are a subject of fierce debate. Reliable population-based estimates of implant prevalence rates are not available, however, due to a lack of historical registries and incomplete sales data, precluding absolute risk assessments. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the methodology of a novel procedure to determine Dutch breast implant prevalence based on the evaluation of routine chest radiographs. METHODS: The validity of the new method was first examined in a separate study. Eight reviewers examined a series of 180 chest radiographs with (n = 60) or without (n = 120) a breast implant confirmed by a computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan. After a consensus meeting with best-performing expert reviewers, we reviewed 3000 chest radiographs of women aged 20 to 70 years in 2 large regional hospitals in the Netherlands in 2015. To calculate the national breast implant prevalence, regional prevalence variations were corrected utilizing the National Breast Cancer Screening Program. RESULTS: Eight reviewers scored with a median sensitivity of 71.7% (range, 41.7%-85.0%) and a median specificity of 94.6% (range, 73.4%-97.5%). After a consensus meeting and a reevaluation by best-performing expert reviewers, sensitivity was 79.9% and specificity was 99.2%. The estimated national prevalence of breast implants among women between 20 and 70 years was 3.0%, ranging from 1.7% at 21 to 30 years to 3.9% between 51 and 60 years. CONCLUSIONS: The novel method in this study was validated with a high sensitivity and specificity, resulting in accurate prevalence estimates and providing the opportunity to conduct absolute risk assessment studies on the health consequences of breast implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2: [Image: see text] Oxford University Press 2020-01 2019-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7006872/ /pubmed/31242279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz136 Text en © 2019 The Aesthetic Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Breast Surgery
de Boer, Mintsje
van Middelkoop, Michele
Hauptmann, Michael
van der Bijl, Noortje
Bosmans, Jorn A W
Hendriks-Brouwer, Narda
Schop, Sijmen J
de Boer, Jan Paul
Hijmering, Nathalie J
Overbeek, Lucy I H
Lobbes, Marc B I
Klazen, Caroline A H
de Jong, Daphne
Rakhorst, Hinne A
van der Hulst, René R W J
van Leeuwen, Flora E
Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs
title Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs
title_full Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs
title_fullStr Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs
title_full_unstemmed Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs
title_short Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs
title_sort breast implant prevalence in the dutch female population assessed by chest radiographs
topic Breast Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31242279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz136
work_keys_str_mv AT deboermintsje breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs
AT vanmiddelkoopmichele breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs
AT hauptmannmichael breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs
AT vanderbijlnoortje breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs
AT bosmansjornaw breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs
AT hendriksbrouwernarda breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs
AT schopsijmenj breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs
AT deboerjanpaul breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs
AT hijmeringnathaliej breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs
AT overbeeklucyih breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs
AT lobbesmarcbi breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs
AT klazencarolineah breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs
AT dejongdaphne breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs
AT rakhorsthinnea breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs
AT vanderhulstrenerwj breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs
AT vanleeuwenflorae breastimplantprevalenceinthedutchfemalepopulationassessedbychestradiographs