Cargando…
The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Assessing genetic lifetime risk for prostate cancer has been proposed as a means of risk stratification to identify those for whom prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is likely to be most valuable. This project aimed to test the effect of introducing a genetic test for lifetime risk...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32032355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003033 |
_version_ | 1783495227387936768 |
---|---|
author | Fredsøe, Jacob Koetsenruyter, Jan Vedsted, Peter Kirkegaard, Pia Væth, Michael Edwards, Adrian Ørntoft, Torben F. Sørensen, Karina D. Bro, Flemming |
author_facet | Fredsøe, Jacob Koetsenruyter, Jan Vedsted, Peter Kirkegaard, Pia Væth, Michael Edwards, Adrian Ørntoft, Torben F. Sørensen, Karina D. Bro, Flemming |
author_sort | Fredsøe, Jacob |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Assessing genetic lifetime risk for prostate cancer has been proposed as a means of risk stratification to identify those for whom prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is likely to be most valuable. This project aimed to test the effect of introducing a genetic test for lifetime risk of prostate cancer in general practice on future PSA testing. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a cluster randomized controlled trial with randomization at the level of general practices (73 in each of two arms) in the Central Region (Region Midtjylland) of Denmark. In intervention practices, men were offered a genetic test (based on genotyping of 33 risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms) in addition to the standard PSA test that informed them about lifetime genetic risk of prostate cancer and distinguished between “normal” and “high” risk. The primary outcome was the proportion of men having a repeated PSA test within 2 years. A multilevel logistic regression model was used to test the association. After applying the exclusion criteria, 3,558 men were recruited in intervention practices, with 1,235 (34.7%) receiving the genetic test, and 4,242 men were recruited in control practices. Men with high genetic risk had a higher propensity for repeated PSA testing within 2 years than men with normal genetic risk (odds ratio [OR] = 8.94, p < 0.01). The study was conducted in routine practice and had some selection bias, which is evidenced by the relatively large proportion of younger and higher income participants taking the genetic test. CONCLUSIONS: Providing general practitioners (GPs) with access to a genetic test to assess lifetime risk of prostate cancer did not reduce the overall number of future PSA tests. However, among men who had a genetic test, knowledge of genetic risk significantly influenced future PSA testing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01739062. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7006905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70069052020-02-20 The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial Fredsøe, Jacob Koetsenruyter, Jan Vedsted, Peter Kirkegaard, Pia Væth, Michael Edwards, Adrian Ørntoft, Torben F. Sørensen, Karina D. Bro, Flemming PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Assessing genetic lifetime risk for prostate cancer has been proposed as a means of risk stratification to identify those for whom prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is likely to be most valuable. This project aimed to test the effect of introducing a genetic test for lifetime risk of prostate cancer in general practice on future PSA testing. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a cluster randomized controlled trial with randomization at the level of general practices (73 in each of two arms) in the Central Region (Region Midtjylland) of Denmark. In intervention practices, men were offered a genetic test (based on genotyping of 33 risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms) in addition to the standard PSA test that informed them about lifetime genetic risk of prostate cancer and distinguished between “normal” and “high” risk. The primary outcome was the proportion of men having a repeated PSA test within 2 years. A multilevel logistic regression model was used to test the association. After applying the exclusion criteria, 3,558 men were recruited in intervention practices, with 1,235 (34.7%) receiving the genetic test, and 4,242 men were recruited in control practices. Men with high genetic risk had a higher propensity for repeated PSA testing within 2 years than men with normal genetic risk (odds ratio [OR] = 8.94, p < 0.01). The study was conducted in routine practice and had some selection bias, which is evidenced by the relatively large proportion of younger and higher income participants taking the genetic test. CONCLUSIONS: Providing general practitioners (GPs) with access to a genetic test to assess lifetime risk of prostate cancer did not reduce the overall number of future PSA tests. However, among men who had a genetic test, knowledge of genetic risk significantly influenced future PSA testing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01739062. Public Library of Science 2020-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7006905/ /pubmed/32032355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003033 Text en © 2020 Fredsøe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fredsøe, Jacob Koetsenruyter, Jan Vedsted, Peter Kirkegaard, Pia Væth, Michael Edwards, Adrian Ørntoft, Torben F. Sørensen, Karina D. Bro, Flemming The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial |
title | The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of psa tests in primary care: a cluster randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32032355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003033 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fredsøejacob theeffectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT koetsenruyterjan theeffectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vedstedpeter theeffectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kirkegaardpia theeffectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT væthmichael theeffectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT edwardsadrian theeffectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ørntofttorbenf theeffectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sørensenkarinad theeffectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT broflemming theeffectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fredsøejacob effectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT koetsenruyterjan effectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vedstedpeter effectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kirkegaardpia effectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT væthmichael effectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT edwardsadrian effectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ørntofttorbenf effectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sørensenkarinad effectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT broflemming effectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |