Cargando…

The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Assessing genetic lifetime risk for prostate cancer has been proposed as a means of risk stratification to identify those for whom prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is likely to be most valuable. This project aimed to test the effect of introducing a genetic test for lifetime risk...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fredsøe, Jacob, Koetsenruyter, Jan, Vedsted, Peter, Kirkegaard, Pia, Væth, Michael, Edwards, Adrian, Ørntoft, Torben F., Sørensen, Karina D., Bro, Flemming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32032355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003033
_version_ 1783495227387936768
author Fredsøe, Jacob
Koetsenruyter, Jan
Vedsted, Peter
Kirkegaard, Pia
Væth, Michael
Edwards, Adrian
Ørntoft, Torben F.
Sørensen, Karina D.
Bro, Flemming
author_facet Fredsøe, Jacob
Koetsenruyter, Jan
Vedsted, Peter
Kirkegaard, Pia
Væth, Michael
Edwards, Adrian
Ørntoft, Torben F.
Sørensen, Karina D.
Bro, Flemming
author_sort Fredsøe, Jacob
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessing genetic lifetime risk for prostate cancer has been proposed as a means of risk stratification to identify those for whom prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is likely to be most valuable. This project aimed to test the effect of introducing a genetic test for lifetime risk of prostate cancer in general practice on future PSA testing. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a cluster randomized controlled trial with randomization at the level of general practices (73 in each of two arms) in the Central Region (Region Midtjylland) of Denmark. In intervention practices, men were offered a genetic test (based on genotyping of 33 risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms) in addition to the standard PSA test that informed them about lifetime genetic risk of prostate cancer and distinguished between “normal” and “high” risk. The primary outcome was the proportion of men having a repeated PSA test within 2 years. A multilevel logistic regression model was used to test the association. After applying the exclusion criteria, 3,558 men were recruited in intervention practices, with 1,235 (34.7%) receiving the genetic test, and 4,242 men were recruited in control practices. Men with high genetic risk had a higher propensity for repeated PSA testing within 2 years than men with normal genetic risk (odds ratio [OR] = 8.94, p < 0.01). The study was conducted in routine practice and had some selection bias, which is evidenced by the relatively large proportion of younger and higher income participants taking the genetic test. CONCLUSIONS: Providing general practitioners (GPs) with access to a genetic test to assess lifetime risk of prostate cancer did not reduce the overall number of future PSA tests. However, among men who had a genetic test, knowledge of genetic risk significantly influenced future PSA testing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01739062.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7006905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70069052020-02-20 The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial Fredsøe, Jacob Koetsenruyter, Jan Vedsted, Peter Kirkegaard, Pia Væth, Michael Edwards, Adrian Ørntoft, Torben F. Sørensen, Karina D. Bro, Flemming PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Assessing genetic lifetime risk for prostate cancer has been proposed as a means of risk stratification to identify those for whom prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is likely to be most valuable. This project aimed to test the effect of introducing a genetic test for lifetime risk of prostate cancer in general practice on future PSA testing. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a cluster randomized controlled trial with randomization at the level of general practices (73 in each of two arms) in the Central Region (Region Midtjylland) of Denmark. In intervention practices, men were offered a genetic test (based on genotyping of 33 risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms) in addition to the standard PSA test that informed them about lifetime genetic risk of prostate cancer and distinguished between “normal” and “high” risk. The primary outcome was the proportion of men having a repeated PSA test within 2 years. A multilevel logistic regression model was used to test the association. After applying the exclusion criteria, 3,558 men were recruited in intervention practices, with 1,235 (34.7%) receiving the genetic test, and 4,242 men were recruited in control practices. Men with high genetic risk had a higher propensity for repeated PSA testing within 2 years than men with normal genetic risk (odds ratio [OR] = 8.94, p < 0.01). The study was conducted in routine practice and had some selection bias, which is evidenced by the relatively large proportion of younger and higher income participants taking the genetic test. CONCLUSIONS: Providing general practitioners (GPs) with access to a genetic test to assess lifetime risk of prostate cancer did not reduce the overall number of future PSA tests. However, among men who had a genetic test, knowledge of genetic risk significantly influenced future PSA testing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01739062. Public Library of Science 2020-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7006905/ /pubmed/32032355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003033 Text en © 2020 Fredsøe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fredsøe, Jacob
Koetsenruyter, Jan
Vedsted, Peter
Kirkegaard, Pia
Væth, Michael
Edwards, Adrian
Ørntoft, Torben F.
Sørensen, Karina D.
Bro, Flemming
The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial
title The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial
title_short The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial
title_sort effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of psa tests in primary care: a cluster randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32032355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003033
work_keys_str_mv AT fredsøejacob theeffectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT koetsenruyterjan theeffectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vedstedpeter theeffectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kirkegaardpia theeffectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT væthmichael theeffectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT edwardsadrian theeffectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ørntofttorbenf theeffectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sørensenkarinad theeffectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT broflemming theeffectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fredsøejacob effectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT koetsenruyterjan effectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vedstedpeter effectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kirkegaardpia effectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT væthmichael effectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT edwardsadrian effectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ørntofttorbenf effectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sørensenkarinad effectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT broflemming effectofassessinggeneticriskofprostatecancerontheuseofpsatestsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial