Cargando…

Primary care interventions to address physical frailty among community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: The best interventions to address frailty among older adults have not yet been fully defined, and the diversity of interventions and outcome measures makes this process challenging. Consequently, there is a lack of guidance for clinicians and researchers regarding which interventions a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macdonald, Stephen H. -F., Travers, John, Shé, Éidín Ní, Bailey, Jade, Romero-Ortuno, Roman, Keyes, Michael, O’Shea, Diarmuid, Cooney, Marie Therese
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32032375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228821
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The best interventions to address frailty among older adults have not yet been fully defined, and the diversity of interventions and outcome measures makes this process challenging. Consequently, there is a lack of guidance for clinicians and researchers regarding which interventions are most likely to help older persons remain robust and independent. This paper uses meta-analysis to assess effectiveness of primary care interventions for physical frailty among community-dwelling adults aged 60+ and provides an up-to-date synthesis of literature in this area. METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and PEDro databases were searched, and RCTs, controlled pilot studies, or trials with similar study designs addressing frailty in the primary care setting among persons aged 60+ were chosen. Study data was abstracted following PRISMA guidelines, then meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model. RESULTS: 31 studies with a total of 4794 participants were analysed. Interventions using predominantly resistance-based exercise and nutrition supplementation seemed to improve frailty status versus control (RR = 0.62 (CI 0.48–0.79), I(2) = 0%). Exercise plus nutrition education also reduced frailty (RR = 0.69 (CI 0.58–0.82), I(2) = 0%). Exercise alone seemed effective in reducing frailty (RR = 0.63 (CI 0.47–0.84), I(2) = 0%) and improving physical performance (RR = 0.43 (CI 0.18–0.67), I(2) = 0%). Exercise alone also appeared superior to control in improving gait speed (SMD = 0.36 (CI 0.10–0.61, I(2) = 74%), leg strength (SMD = 0.61 (CI 0.09–1.13), I(2) = 87%), and grip strength (Mean Difference = 1.08 (CI 0.02–2.15), I(2) = 71%) though a high degree of heterogeneity was observed. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (RR = 0.77 (CI 0.64–0.93), I(2) = 0%) also seemed superior to control in reducing frailty. CONCLUSION: Exercise alone or with nutrition supplementation or education, and comprehensive geriatric assessment, may reduce physical frailty. Individual-level factors and health systems resource availability will likely determine configuration of future interventions.