Cargando…

Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers

Public trust in science, effective science communication, and rapid and constructive response to authors about their submissions are of paramount importance to the scientific enterprise and indeed to society itself. This is really at the heart of peer review—providing thoughtful insights into both t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Filippelli, Gabriel, Colwell, Rita, Anenberg, Susan C., Balbus, John M., Ceccarelli, Daniela, Hudson‐Edwards, Karen, Jutla, Antarpreet, Miao, Chiyuan, Sandifer, Paul A., Vengosh, Avner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7007098/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019GH000198
_version_ 1783495265689272320
author Filippelli, Gabriel
Colwell, Rita
Anenberg, Susan C.
Balbus, John M.
Ceccarelli, Daniela
Hudson‐Edwards, Karen
Jutla, Antarpreet
Miao, Chiyuan
Sandifer, Paul A.
Vengosh, Avner
author_facet Filippelli, Gabriel
Colwell, Rita
Anenberg, Susan C.
Balbus, John M.
Ceccarelli, Daniela
Hudson‐Edwards, Karen
Jutla, Antarpreet
Miao, Chiyuan
Sandifer, Paul A.
Vengosh, Avner
author_sort Filippelli, Gabriel
collection PubMed
description Public trust in science, effective science communication, and rapid and constructive response to authors about their submissions are of paramount importance to the scientific enterprise and indeed to society itself. This is really at the heart of peer review—providing thoughtful insights into both the scientific quality and importance of work, and also how it is communicated to other scientists and increasingly to a broader audience. Very few opportunities exist to acknowledge the mostly anonymous process of peer review, especially given the huge increase in review requests and the relatively mechanical nature of online reviewing platforms. We continue to be humbled by the time, effort, and careful insights that our colleagues share with each other through the process of peer review. In 2018, GeoHealth benefited from more than 83 reviews provided by 53 of our peers for papers submitted to the journal. Thank you all for your awesome efforts toward advancing geohealth now and for the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7007098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70070982020-03-10 Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers Filippelli, Gabriel Colwell, Rita Anenberg, Susan C. Balbus, John M. Ceccarelli, Daniela Hudson‐Edwards, Karen Jutla, Antarpreet Miao, Chiyuan Sandifer, Paul A. Vengosh, Avner Geohealth Editorial Public trust in science, effective science communication, and rapid and constructive response to authors about their submissions are of paramount importance to the scientific enterprise and indeed to society itself. This is really at the heart of peer review—providing thoughtful insights into both the scientific quality and importance of work, and also how it is communicated to other scientists and increasingly to a broader audience. Very few opportunities exist to acknowledge the mostly anonymous process of peer review, especially given the huge increase in review requests and the relatively mechanical nature of online reviewing platforms. We continue to be humbled by the time, effort, and careful insights that our colleagues share with each other through the process of peer review. In 2018, GeoHealth benefited from more than 83 reviews provided by 53 of our peers for papers submitted to the journal. Thank you all for your awesome efforts toward advancing geohealth now and for the future. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7007098/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019GH000198 Text en ©2019. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Editorial
Filippelli, Gabriel
Colwell, Rita
Anenberg, Susan C.
Balbus, John M.
Ceccarelli, Daniela
Hudson‐Edwards, Karen
Jutla, Antarpreet
Miao, Chiyuan
Sandifer, Paul A.
Vengosh, Avner
Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers
title Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers
title_full Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers
title_fullStr Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers
title_full_unstemmed Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers
title_short Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers
title_sort thank you to our 2018 peer reviewers
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7007098/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019GH000198
work_keys_str_mv AT filippelligabriel thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers
AT colwellrita thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers
AT anenbergsusanc thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers
AT balbusjohnm thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers
AT ceccarellidaniela thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers
AT hudsonedwardskaren thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers
AT jutlaantarpreet thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers
AT miaochiyuan thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers
AT sandiferpaula thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers
AT vengoshavner thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers