Cargando…
Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers
Public trust in science, effective science communication, and rapid and constructive response to authors about their submissions are of paramount importance to the scientific enterprise and indeed to society itself. This is really at the heart of peer review—providing thoughtful insights into both t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7007098/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019GH000198 |
_version_ | 1783495265689272320 |
---|---|
author | Filippelli, Gabriel Colwell, Rita Anenberg, Susan C. Balbus, John M. Ceccarelli, Daniela Hudson‐Edwards, Karen Jutla, Antarpreet Miao, Chiyuan Sandifer, Paul A. Vengosh, Avner |
author_facet | Filippelli, Gabriel Colwell, Rita Anenberg, Susan C. Balbus, John M. Ceccarelli, Daniela Hudson‐Edwards, Karen Jutla, Antarpreet Miao, Chiyuan Sandifer, Paul A. Vengosh, Avner |
author_sort | Filippelli, Gabriel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Public trust in science, effective science communication, and rapid and constructive response to authors about their submissions are of paramount importance to the scientific enterprise and indeed to society itself. This is really at the heart of peer review—providing thoughtful insights into both the scientific quality and importance of work, and also how it is communicated to other scientists and increasingly to a broader audience. Very few opportunities exist to acknowledge the mostly anonymous process of peer review, especially given the huge increase in review requests and the relatively mechanical nature of online reviewing platforms. We continue to be humbled by the time, effort, and careful insights that our colleagues share with each other through the process of peer review. In 2018, GeoHealth benefited from more than 83 reviews provided by 53 of our peers for papers submitted to the journal. Thank you all for your awesome efforts toward advancing geohealth now and for the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7007098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70070982020-03-10 Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers Filippelli, Gabriel Colwell, Rita Anenberg, Susan C. Balbus, John M. Ceccarelli, Daniela Hudson‐Edwards, Karen Jutla, Antarpreet Miao, Chiyuan Sandifer, Paul A. Vengosh, Avner Geohealth Editorial Public trust in science, effective science communication, and rapid and constructive response to authors about their submissions are of paramount importance to the scientific enterprise and indeed to society itself. This is really at the heart of peer review—providing thoughtful insights into both the scientific quality and importance of work, and also how it is communicated to other scientists and increasingly to a broader audience. Very few opportunities exist to acknowledge the mostly anonymous process of peer review, especially given the huge increase in review requests and the relatively mechanical nature of online reviewing platforms. We continue to be humbled by the time, effort, and careful insights that our colleagues share with each other through the process of peer review. In 2018, GeoHealth benefited from more than 83 reviews provided by 53 of our peers for papers submitted to the journal. Thank you all for your awesome efforts toward advancing geohealth now and for the future. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7007098/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019GH000198 Text en ©2019. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Filippelli, Gabriel Colwell, Rita Anenberg, Susan C. Balbus, John M. Ceccarelli, Daniela Hudson‐Edwards, Karen Jutla, Antarpreet Miao, Chiyuan Sandifer, Paul A. Vengosh, Avner Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers |
title | Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers |
title_full | Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers |
title_fullStr | Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers |
title_full_unstemmed | Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers |
title_short | Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers |
title_sort | thank you to our 2018 peer reviewers |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7007098/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019GH000198 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT filippelligabriel thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers AT colwellrita thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers AT anenbergsusanc thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers AT balbusjohnm thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers AT ceccarellidaniela thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers AT hudsonedwardskaren thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers AT jutlaantarpreet thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers AT miaochiyuan thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers AT sandiferpaula thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers AT vengoshavner thankyoutoour2018peerreviewers |