Cargando…

Causal evidence supporting the proposal that dopamine transients function as temporal difference prediction errors

Reward-evoked dopamine transients are well-established as prediction errors. However the central tenet of temporal difference accounts – that similar transients evoked by reward-predictive cues also function as errors – remains untested. Here we addressed this by showing that optogenetically-shuntin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maes, Etienne JP, Sharpe, Melissa J, Usypchuk, Alexandra A., Lozzi, Megan, Chang, Chun Yun, Gardner, Matthew P.H., Schoenbaum, Geoffrey, Iordanova, Mihaela D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7007380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31959935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0574-1
Descripción
Sumario:Reward-evoked dopamine transients are well-established as prediction errors. However the central tenet of temporal difference accounts – that similar transients evoked by reward-predictive cues also function as errors – remains untested. Here we addressed this by showing that optogenetically-shunting dopamine activity at the start of a reward-predicting cue prevents second-order conditioning without affecting blocking. These results indicate that cue-evoked transients function as temporal-difference prediction errors rather than reward predictions.